M/S Aage Hath Badhao Sewa Trust, Lucknow vs Assessee
- CitationITA No.274&275/LKW/2014
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
While granting registration under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Commissioner is required to examine the objects of the applicant trust or society, along with its other activities, and to grant registration if those objects are charitable in nature; an enquiry confined to the maintenance of accounts and faults in them does not constitute adjudication of the application for registration under that section. The same principle applies to an application for approval under section 80G of the Act, where the Commissioner's denial was likewise founded on matters other than an examination of the applicant's objects and activities. Where the Commissioner has not properly adjudicated an application for registration under section 12AA or approval under section 80G, the Tribunal may set aside the order and restore the matter to the Commissioner with a direction to decide both applications afresh after affording the assessee an opportunity of being heard.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Appellant by: Shri. A. P. Sinha, Advocate Respondent by: Dr. Anant Kumar Agrawal, CIT (DR) Date of hearing: 15 06 2015 Date of pronouncement: 19 06 2015
ORDER
PER SUNIL KUMAR YADAV:
These appeals are preferred by the assessee against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax denying registration under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called in short "the Act") and approval under section 80G of the Act.
2. During the course of hearing, the ld. counsel for the assessee has invited our attention to the order passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax under section 12AA of the Act with the submission that the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax has examined the accounts of the assessee and found fault therein whereas at the time of granting registration under section 12AA of the Act, the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax is required to examine the objects of the applicant trust/society and if the objects of the society/trust are charitable in nature, registration under section 12AA of the :-2-:
Act should be granted. But in the instant case, the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax has made his comments with regard to the maintenance of the books of account and faults therein. He has not rather examined the objects of the assessee society. Therefore, the reasons for denying the registration under section 12AA of the Act are not in accordance with the law. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the matter may be restored back to the file of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax for adjudicating the application for registration.
3. Similar is the position while denying approval under section 80G of the Act.
4. The ld. D.R., on the other hand, has placed reliance upon the orders of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax.
5. Having carefully examined the orders of the lower authorities in the light of the rival submissions, we are of the view that while granting registration under section 12AA of the Act, the ld. Commissioner of Income- tax is required to examine the objects of the assessee-society along with other activities of the assessee. But in the instant case, the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax has not examined the objects of the society and has simply made his comments with respect to the maintenance of accounts and fault noticed therein. We are, therefore, of the view that the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax has not properly adjudicated the issue of grant of registration under section 12AA of the Act.
6. Similar is the position while denying approval under section 80G of the Act. We, therefore, set aside the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax and restore the matter to his file with a direction to adjudicate both the applications afresh after affording opportunity of being heard to the assessee in accordance with the law. Accordingly, appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes. :-3-:
7. In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
Order was pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the captioned page.
SD/- SD/- [A. K. GARODIA] [SUNIL KUMAR YADAV] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
DATED: 19TH June, 2015 JJ:1606
Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR Assistant Registrar
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free