Loyal Credit And Investment Ltd vs Cosmopolis Properties Pvt Ltd
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1465 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where an award has been passed in favour of the financial creditor and the corporate debtor has challenged it by an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 that remains pending before the High Court, the pendency of that challenge does not prevent the existence of a default from being established; an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 founded on such an award is therefore maintainable.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
M/s. Loyal Credit and Investment Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus
M/s. Cosmopolis Properties Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant : Mr. D. Sreenivasan, Mr. P. Elayaraja Kumar and Mr. G. Ananda Selvam, Advocates
ORDER
02.01.2020 The Appellant preferred an application under Section 7 of the
'Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ('I&B Code', for short) for initiation of
the 'corporate insolvency resolution process' against 'M/s. Cosmopolis Properties
Pvt. Ltd.'. The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal),
Division Bench, Chennai rejected the application on merit.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant submits that the day
i.e. 13th November, 2019 when the matter was taken up by the Adjudicating
Authority, an ex parte order was passed without hearing the Appellant. However,
we found that in the 1st Session when the matter was called for, learned counsel
for the Appellant was present and subsequently when the matter was taken up
in the 2nd Session, despite repeated calls nobody appears on behalf of the
Appellant.
With a view to decide as to whether the matter requires to remand back,
we heard the case on merit.
From the record, we find that an award has been passed by the Arbitral
Tribunal in favour of the Appellant - 'M/s. Loyal Credit and Investments Ltd.'
against the Respondent - 'M/s. Cosmopolis Properties Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate
Debtor) on 28th June, 2016. Admittedly, the Respondent has moved an
application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before
the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Madras and the matter is pending.
In the circumstances, we hold that it cannot be alleged that there is a
default and application under Section 7 was not maintainable. However, the
impugned order dated 13th November, 2019 passed by the Adjudicating
Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Division Bench, Chennai and the
order passed by this Appellate Tribunal will not come in the way of the Appellant
for deciding the issue, which is pending for consideration before the Hon'ble High
Court of Judicature at Madras.
The appeal stands dismissed with aforesaid observations. No costs.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice Bansi Lal Bhat ] Member (Judicial)
/ns/gc/
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1465 of 2019
/2/
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free