Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd vs State Bank Of India & Ors

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal3 March 2020

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Appellate Tribunal, in exercise of its power under Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016, may set aside an order of liquidation of a corporate debtor where the approved resolution plan has since been given effect by the successful resolution applicant's payment of the upfront amount, the committee of creditors and other creditors have no objection, and liquidation would not serve the interests of the corporate debtor, its employees, or its stakeholders. Where the successful resolution applicant has not implemented an approved resolution plan within the time allowed, the Tribunal may, in the interest of the stakeholders and to avoid liquidation, extend the period of compliance on the applicant's undertaking to deposit the amounts offered in the approved plan within a fixed timeframe, and may stay the liquidation order pending such compliance.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 724 of 2019IN THE MATTER OF:

Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd. ...Appellant

Vs.

State Bank of India & Ors. ...Respondents

Present: For Appellant: - Mr. Virender Ganda, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Ms. Henna George, Mr. Vishal Ganda, Ms. Shelly Khanna, Mr. Aman Choudhary and Mr. Saransh Kothari, Advocates.

For Respondents: - Mr. Joy Saha, Senior Advocate with Ms. Misha and Mr. Nikhil Mathura, Advocates. Mr. Kushal Sarkar and Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocates for IBBI.

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 725 of 2019

IN THE MATTER OF:

Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd. ...Appellant

Vs.

State Bank of India & Ors. ...Respondents

Present: For Appellant: - Mr. Virender Ganda, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Ms. Henna George, Mr. Vishal Ganda, Ms. Shelly Khanna, Mr. Aman Choudhary and Mr. Saransh Kothari, Advocates.

For Respondents: - Mr. Joy Saha, Senior Advocate with Ms. Misha and Mr. Nikhil Mathur, Advocates. Mr. Kushal Sarkar and Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocates for IBBI.

2 Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 870 of 2019

IN THE MATTER OF:

State Bank of India ...Appellant

Vs.

Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd. ...Respondent

Present: For Appellant: - Mr. Joy Saha, Senior Advocate with Ms.

Misha and Mr. Nikhil Mathur, Advocates.

For Respondents: - Mr. Virender Ganda, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Ms. Henna George, Mr. Vishal Ganda, Ms. Shelly Khanna, Mr. Aman Choudhary and Mr. Saransh Kothari, Advocates. Mr. Kushal Sarkar and Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocates for IBBI.

Mr. Arjun Asthana, Ms. Sreenita Ghosh and Mr. Sumit Binani, Advocates for Liquidator. Mr. Pradhuman Gohil, Ms. Ranu Purohit and Mr. Upendra Sai Perala, Advocates for Intervenor.

O R D E R

03.03.2020─ In all these appeals, as similar order is under challenge

and the Appellant- 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' is the 'Successful

Resolution Applicant', they are heard together and disposed of by this

common order.

2. The 'State Bank of India'- ('Financial Creditor') filed two separate

applications under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,

2016 ("I&B Code" for short), one against 'M/s. Adhunik Metaliks Limited'

('Corporate Debtor') and another against 'M/s. Zion Steel Limited'

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019 3

(another 'Corporate Debtor'), the subsidiary of 'M/s. Adhunik Metaliks

Limited'.

3. In both the 'Corporate Insolvency Resolution Processes', the

Appellant- 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' filed 'Resolution Plans' and

became 'Successful Resolution Applicant'. The 'Resolution Plan'

submitted by 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' for 'M/s. Adhunik Metaliks

Limited' ('Corporate Debtor') was approved by the Adjudicating Authority

(National Company Law Tribunal), Kolkata Bench, Kolkata, on 17th July,

2018.

4. The 'Resolution Plan' submitted for 'M/s. Zion Steel Limited'

(another 'Corporate Debtor'), the subsidiary of 'M/s. Adhunik Metaliks

Limited' was also approved by the same Adjudicating Authority by

another order dated 10th July, 2018.

5. In both the cases, the 'Committee of Creditors' approved the

'Resolution Plans' by 99.94% and 100% voting shares respectively. While

approving the 'Resolution Plan' of 'M/s. Adhunik Metaliks Limited', one

'MSTC Limited' moved an application for settling their claim. The claim

of 'MSTC Limited' was rejected which was challenged in appeal before this

Appellate Tribunal and having dismissed, the said 'MSTC Limited' moved

before the Hon'ble Supreme Court which also dismissed its appeal. In

effect, both the 'Resolution Plans' approved by the Adjudicating Authority

reached finality.

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019 4

6. Subsequently, 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' did not take steps to

implement the plan and raised certain grievances with regard to non-

compliance of certain agreements in terms of the 'Resolution Plans' by

the 'Committee of Creditors'.

7. 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' initially moved before the

Adjudicating Authority bringing certain facts of non-implementation of

certain agreements in terms of the 'Resolution Plans' by the 'Committee

of Creditors', which having rejected, it preferred the appeals before this

Appellate Tribunal.

8. At that stage, the appeal of 'MSTC Limited' was pending. The case

of 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' was also heard subsequently.

9. On 15th March, 2019, this Appellate Tribunal while rejected the

prayer of 'MSTC Limited', gave opportunity to the Appellant- 'Liberty

House Group Pte. Ltd.' for the purpose of compliance of the order and

implementation of the plan and provided another 30 days to make

upfront payment in terms of the 'Resolution Plan'. It was observed that

on failure, it was open to the Adjudicating Authority, Kolkata Bench,

Kolkata, to pass appropriate order in accordance with law.

10. For some reasons, 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' failed to make

upfront payment within 30 days of extended period. At that stage, the

'Committee of Creditors' moved an application for re-initiation of the

'Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process' and to allow it to consider the

other 'Resolution Plan(s)' on the ground that 'Liberty House Group Pte.

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019 5

Ltd.' had failed to implement the plan within the extended period of 30

days.

11. The 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' sought for certain clarification

for the purpose of implementation of the 'Resolution Plans'. The

Adjudicating Authority by impugned order dated 9th July, 2019, rejected

the prayer made by the 'Committee of Creditors' and 'Liberty House

Group Pte. Ltd.'.

12. By common impugned order dated 9th July, 2019, order for

liquidation of 'M/s. Adhunik Metaliks Limited' and 'M/s. Zion Steel

Limited' was passed. The Adjudicating Authority also refused to grant

further time to the 'Committee of Creditors' to consider the other

'Resolution Plan(s)'.

'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' submitted that it wanted that Rs.50

Crores already deposited by it, should be adjusted against the upfront

payment. On the other hand, the 'Committee of Creditors' was of the view

that the said amount should be forfeited. The Adjudicating Authority by

impugned order dated 9th July, 2019 rejected the submissions by the

'Committee of Creditors' and held that the said amount cannot be

forfeited. Against the refusal of the prayer of 'Committee of Creditors', one

appeal has been preferred by the 'State Bank of India' being Company

Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 870 of 2019 and with respect to liquidation

order of 'M/s. Adhunik Metaliks Limited' and 'M/s. Zion Steel Limited',

two appeals have been preferred by 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.'

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019 6

('Successful Resolution Applicant') being Company Appeal (AT)

(Insolvency) Nos. 724 & 725 of 2019.

13. During the pendency of the appeals, the matter was discussed and

came to be finally settled.

14. On 22nd January, 2020, after hearing the parties, this Appellate

Tribunal passed following order:

"O R D E R

22.01.2020: The 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' - 'Successful Resolution Applicant' of 'Adhunik Metaliks Ltd.' (Corporate Debtor) and 'Zion Steel Ltd.' (another Corporate Debtor) has filed an affidavit to allow it to comply with the 'resolution plan(s)' of 'Adhunik Metaliks Ltd.' and 'Zion Steel Ltd.' and to set aside the order(s) of 'Liquidation' of both the aforesaid 'Corporate Debtors'.

2. We have gone through the affidavit and heard Mr. Virender Ganda, learned senior counsel for the Appellant, Mr. Joy Saha, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the 'Committee of Creditors' and others and we are of the view that in the interest of the stakeholders/financial creditors, operational creditors (employees) if the period of compliance of both the 'resolution plans' of Adhunik Metaliks Ltd.' (one 'Corporate Debtor) and 'Zion Steel Ltd.' (another 'Corporate Debtor')

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019 7

are extended, who otherwise will suffer 'Liquidation', we allowed the 'Successful Resolution Applicant' - Adhunik Metaliks Ltd.' to file undertaking giving timeframe of compliance of both the plans by depositing the amount as offered in their approved plans.

3. Pursuant to the earlier, an affidavit has been filed on behalf of 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' on 20th January, 2020 which reads as follows:

"1. I am the Authorized Signatory of the Appellant/Resolution Applicant Company and I say that I am fully conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case and am duly empowered and competent to swear and affirm this affidavit.

2. I state that the information is based on the record of Resolution Applicant Company and information received and believed to be true and correct from the said record. The legal submissions are based on legal advice received and believed to be true and correct.

3. I state that I have obtained instructions from the Resolution Applicant Company being Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd. (hereinafter called as 'Liberty

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019 8

House'/ 'Resolution Applicant') and accordingly, I am filing the instant affidavit.

4. I state that the Resolution Plan in the matter of Adhunik Metaliks Ltd.

('Adhunik') and Zion Steel Ltd., ('Zion'), was approved by the Ld. Adjudicating Authority, Kolkata vide its order dated 17.07.2018 and 10.07.2018 respectively, without any modifications.

5. In the matter of Adhunik, the payment to be made to the Financial Creditors is Rs.410 Crores and in the matter of Zion, the payment to be made to the Financial Creditors is Rs. 15 Crores.

6. The Resolution Applicant has already deposited Rs. 50 Crores for Adhunik and Rs. 5 Crores for Zion in the Bank Account of LHG Metal Two Private Limited maintained with SBI, Kolkata.

7. The proposal for the implementation of the Resolution Plan is hereinbelow:

i. Liberty House shall deposit, Rs. 360 crores (Rs. 410 less Rs. 50 crores already deposited) for Adhunik and

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019 9

Rs. 10 Crores (Rs. 15 less 5 crores already deposited) for Zion, as full and final settlement towards all Financial Creditors i.e. lenders as per Resolution Plan, within three weeks of NCLAT Order in a Bank account specified by and under supervision of NCLAT.

ii. Liquidator/s of Adhunik & Zion shall demit office on aforesaid deposit and as per Resolution Plan, all past directors of Adhunik & Zion shall demit office and Liberty House will be entitled to appoint all directors to the Board of both Corporate Debtors to complete all requisite steps and also procedural & legal formalities, documentation including delisting, issue of Equity Shares, capital reduction, merger, etc. as per the Resolution Plans and for taking over control, management & operations of Adhunik & Zion.

iii. The CoC, Monitoring Committees, Managing Agency, Resolution Professionals and/or, Liquidators (and/ or any persons working for

them) shall handover all the statutory records, operations, assets, land, plant & machinery, documents, books, control, management etc. of Adhunik

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019 10

and Zion within two days after the deposit and shall Co-operate with Liberty House to implement all other steps of the Resolution Plans.

iv. Simultaneously, the CoC should deposit the signed and executed Deed of Debt Assignment of both Adhunik & Zion as per agreed format with the Registrar, NCLAT for simultaneous exchange as per Resolution Plans.

v. NCLAT can release the said deposited amounts to the CoC and simultaneously hand over the Debt Assignment Deeds to Liberty House and all rights over the Debt, Charges of Lenders etc. against the Corporate Debtors shall stand transferred to Liberty House as per Resolution Plans.

vi. The Resolution Applicant shall make the payment of CIRP costs and Operational Creditors of Adhunik and Zion as per the Resolution Plans.

vii. Resolution Applicant is ready and willing to pay maximum of Rs. 10 crores additional amount towards any and all contingencies arising from this resolution as a goodwill gesture.

viii. The Resolution Plans shall be deemed to have been implemented by Liberty

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019 11

House without any default on payment of aforesaid amount to the Financial Creditors by Liberty House.

ix. Liquidation order passed by Ld. Adjudicating Authority in the matter of Adhunik & Zion to be set aside. The entire Resolution Plans approved by the Ld. Adjudicating Authority shall be deemed to be in effect and under implementation.

8. I state that the contents of the instant affidavit are true and correct and nothing material has been concealed therefrom."

4. To give one opportunity to the 'Successful Resolution Applicant' in both the matters, we allow the 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' to comply with the proposal as shown at paragraph 7(i) and paragraph 7((vii) as quoted above. The 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' is directed to deposit Rs.360 crores (Rupees Three hundred sixty Crores) (Rs. 410 less by Rs. 50 crores already deposited) as per approved 'resolution plan' of 'Adhunik Metaliks Ltd.' and Rs. 10 crores (Rupees Ten Crores) (Rs. 15 Crores less by 5 crores already deposited) as per 'approved resolution plan' of 'Zion Steel Ltd.' as full and final settlement towards the 'Financial Creditors'/'Lenders' of the 'resolution plan(s)' respectively by 14th February,

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019 12

2020 in the account of the 'State Bank of India', which is the lead bank.

5. The 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' is also directed to deposit additional Rs. 10 crores (Rupees Ten Crores) in terms of their undertaking as given at paragraph 7(vii) by the same date i.e. 14th February, 2020 in the account of the 'State Bank of India', the lead bank.

6. The 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' will also deposit the 'corporate insolvency resolution process' cost as per the approved 'resolution plan(s)' of 'Adhunik Metaliks Ltd.' and 'Zion Steel Ltd.' by 14th February, 2020 in the account of 'State Bank of India'. Once the 'corporate insolvency resolution process' cost of both the companies are deposited with the Bank, the Bank will transfer the amount to the 'Monitoring Committee' presided by the 'Resolution Professional' for its implementation. However, the 'Monitoring Committee' will not disburse or distribute the aforesaid amount without prior consent of the Appellate Tribunal.

7. Once the total amount is deposited, this Appellate Tribunal will consider the rest of the proposal as made in paragraph 7, and quoted above and will pass appropriate order.

Place these appeals 'for orders' on 17th February, 2020 before the 1st Bench on the top of the list."

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019 13

15. Subsequently, it was informed that the upfront amount has been

made and the statement was recorded by this Appellate Tribunal's order

dated 17th February, 2020, which reads as follows:

"O R D E R

17.02.2020 Mr. Virendra Ganda, learned

Senior Counsel for the Appellant(s) submits that

the amount in terms of the earlier order dated

21st January, 2020 has been paid. Mr. Joy

Saha, learned Senior Counsel appearing on

behalf of 'Committee of Creditors' has also

accepted the same.

In view of the development, the order of

'Liquidation' is stayed and the 'Liquidator' will

function as 'Resolution Professional'.

The only question, which is required to be

determined, is about the 'corporate insolvency

resolution process cost'. According to the

Appellant, it has already paid the amount. The

table of payments have been provided by the

Appellant, which is as follows:

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019 14

In view of the above development, we

allow the 'Resolution Professional'/'Liquidator'

to hand over the records, control etc. to the

Appellant ('Successful Resolution Applicant' -

Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.). Parties will also

ensure to implement the plan in its letter and

spirit. The detailed affidavit(s) be filed by the

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019 15

Appellant and the 'Committee of Creditors'

within a week. Rest of the issues will be

decided on the next date.

Post the case 'for orders' on 3rd March,

2020 before the 1st Bench on the top of the list.

The appeal may be disposed of on the next date.

In view of the aforesaid development,

having complied with the 'Resolution Plan', it

will be open to the Appellant - 'Liberty House

Group Pte. Ltd.' to move before the 'Insolvency

and Bankruptcy Board of India' with the request

to withdraw the complaint before the Learned

Special Judge, Cuttack. The Appellant may

request the learned Session Judge, High Court

of Orissa and the learned Special Judge,

Cuttack not to take cognizance of the offence."

16. In view of the fact that both the 'Resolution Plans' submitted by

'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.' in respect of 'M/s. Adhunik Metaliks

Limited' and 'M/s. Zion Steel Limited' have now been given effect by

making full payment of upfront amount, learned counsel appearing on

behalf of the 'Committee of Creditors' submits that he has been

instructed not to press the appeal preferred by the State Bank of India.

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019 16

17. Mr. Sumit Binani, the 'Resolution Professional' submitted that for

'M/s. Adhunik Metaliks Limited', cost of the 'Corporate Insolvency

Resolution Process' has been partly paid.

18. One Ms. Ranu Purohit, Advocate who appears for Intervenor- 'IFGL

Refractoties Limited' submits that the 'Operational Creditor' has not been

paid its dues.

19. However, we are not inclined to decide the issue raised by Mr.

Sumit Binani in respect of the 'Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

Costs' of 'M/s. Adhunik Metaliks Limited' or the stand taken on behalf of

Intervenor- 'IFGL Refractoties Limited' as the 'Resolution Plans' approved

earlier by the Adjudicating Authority were not challenged by them.

Because of non-implementation of plan, such issues were never raised

before the Adjudicating Authority or before this Appellate Tribunal. It was

the non-implementation of the 'Resolution Plans' that attracted the

issuance of impugned order of liquidation of both the 'Corporate Debtors'-

'M/s. Adhunik Metaliks Limited' and 'M/s. Zion Steel Limited'.

20. In the present case, as we find that both the 'Resolution Plans' are

now being implemented and 'Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd.', on our

suggestion has paid additional amount of Rs.10 Crores, we are inclined

to interfere with the impugned order of liquidation. We, in exercise of

powers conferred under Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016 and to ensure

that the CIRP of both the 'Corporate Debtors'- 'M/s. Adhunik Metaliks

Limited' and 'M/s. Zion Steel Limited' now reaches finality, the

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019 17

'Committee of Creditors', other Creditors etc., now have no objection and

the liquidation will not be in the interest of both the 'Corporate Debtors'-

'M/s. Adhunik Metaliks Limited' and 'M/s. Zion Steel Limited', its

employees etc., set aside the impugned order dated 9th July, 2019. Both

the 'Resolution Plans' be implemented in its letter and spirit. The claim

of all the Creditors stand settled. Control and records of both the

'Corporate Debtors'- 'M/s. Adhunik Metaliks Limited' and 'M/s. Zion

Steel Limited' have already been handed over to the 'Successful

Resolution Applicant' by 'Committee of Creditors'/ Monitoring

Committee/ 'Resolution Professional'. 'Committee of Creditors'/

Monitoring Committee/ 'Resolution Professional' stand discharged.

21. Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocate has appeared on behalf of the

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI). Let a copy of this order

be handed over to the Chairperson, IBBI to enable the IBBI to withdraw

the complaints, if any, made before the Special Judge.

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) Nos. 724 & 725 of 2019 are

allowed. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 870 of 2019 stands

disposed of. Earlier interim orders stand vacated.

[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson

(Justice Bansi Lal Bhat) Member(Judicial) Ar/G

Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) Nos. 724, 725 & 870 of 2019

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free