Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Kuldeep Verma Liquidator Of M/S ... vs Government Of Kerela And Ors

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal28 October 2024Ashok Bhushan

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

A purchaser who withdraws from an approved sale of corporate assets is subject to the consequences available in law for such withdrawal, and the adjudicating authority cannot be compelled, by direction in insolvency proceedings, to require that purchaser to complete the purchase.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALPRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHIComp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1955 of 2024&I.A. No. 7250 of 2024IN THE MATTER OF:

Kuldeep Verma ...Appellant(s)

Versus

Government of Kerala & Ors. ...Respondent(s) Present: For Appellant : Mr. Vivek Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rahul Sharma, Mr. Shubham Shekhar, Mr. Himanshu Singh, Advocates. For Respondents :

ORDER

(Hybrid Mode) 28.10.2024: Heard Counsel for the Appellant.

2. This appeal has been filed against the order dated 31.07.2024 passed

by National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Bench (Court-II) in CA -

1297/2020.

3. This appeal has been filed by the liquidator of Corporate Debtor. The

submission of the Counsel for the Appellant is that the liquidator proposed

sale of the shares of subsidiary company namely, M/s Hindustan Newsprint

Ltd. which was approved by the Adjudicating Authority on 25.11.2019 and the Govt. of Kerala has offered to purchase the share for amount of Rs. 25

Cr. Payable in 3 months.

4. It is submitted that Govt. of Kerala backed out from the purchase of

the shares. Hence, the IA 1297/2020 was filed by the appellant seeking

direction to the Govt. of Kerala to purchase the shares and pay the

consideration which has been rejected by the Adjudicating Authority.

5. It is submitted that moratorium under Section 14 was applicable with

regard to the corporate debtor and assets of Hindustan Newsprint Ltd.

shares belong to the Hindustan Paper Corporation Ltd.

6. We have considered the submission and perused the record.

7. This court notes that the State of Kerala has offered to purchase the

shares of subsidiary which also had the approval of the NCLT on 25.11.2019

however the subsidiary company M/s Hindustan Newsprint Ltd. went to the

CIRP on 28.11.2019 subsequent to the approval by the NCLT which was

reason for the State of Kerala to back out from the transaction and it has

refused to purchase the same.

8. We are of the view that a purchaser backing out from the transaction

the consequences as available in law have to followed and take recourse, but

no direction could be issued to compel the State to purchase the share. The Adjudicating Authority did not commit any error in rejecting the IA filed by

the liquidator.

9. We do find any ground to warrant any interference. The appeal is

disposed of.

10. IA No. 7250/2024- Sufficient cause has been shown for condonation

of 12 days' delay in filing the appeal. Delay condoned.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical) sr/nn

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free