Karan Gambhir Director , Forgings Pvt. ... vs Sajeve Bhushan Deora, Liquidator For ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 779 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant's complaint about the short window for submitting a resolution plan was not raised before the Adjudicating Authority at the appropriate stage, and because no resolution plan was submitted within the statutory period, so that liquidation under Section 33 was the only remaining course.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Karan Gambhir, Director, Forgings Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus
Sajeve Bhushan Deora, Liquidator for Forgings Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
Present:
For Appellant : Mr. Karan Gandhi and Ms. Sudiksha Saini, Advocates
For Respondent : Mr. Sumesh Dhawan, Ms. Vatsala Kak and Ms. Tulika Bhatnagar, Advocates for 'cOc' Mr. Rudreshwar Singh, Advocate Mr. Karan Gandhi and Ms. Sudiksha Saini, Advocates
ORDER
09.01.2019 This appeal has been preferred by the appellant - Mr. Karan
Gambhir, Director of Forgings Private Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) against the order
dated 26th October, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National
Company Law Tribunal) Principal Bench, New Delhi whereby the Adjudicating
Authority passed the order under Section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016 (for short, the 'I&B Code') directing for liquidation of the 'corporate
debtor'. On the last occasion when the matter was taken up on 14th December,
2018, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the order of liquidation
had passed only after 80 days but such submission was not accepted by this
Appellate Tribunal in view of the fact that within the time for filing of resolution
plan, no plan was submitted. Learned counsel for the appellant today submits
-2 -
that only 14 days' time was given to submit the 'resolution plan' and it was very
short period to submit the same. However, that issue was not raised by the
appellant or any other person before the Adjudicating Authority at appropriate
stage.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the 'Committee of Creditors'
submits that in absence of any 'resolution plan', the application under Section
33 was filed by the 'Resolution Professional' with the approval of the 'Committee
of Creditors' after 80 days. However, the Adjudicating Authority awaited to find
out whether any other person is ready to file 'resolution plan'. The impugned
order was passed on 26th October, 2018 only on completion of 180 days.
In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the respondent and not denied by
the appellant and in absence of any 'resolution plan', no other option left but to
dismiss the appeal.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No cost.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice Bansi Lal Bhat ] Member (Judicial)
/ns/gc/
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 779 of 2018
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free