JSW Steel Limited, Creixent Special Steels Limited and JSW Ispat Special Products Limited. — Combination C-2022/07/953
- Case No.C-2022/07/953
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A combination may be approved under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 where, having assessed the proposed combination on the factors listed in Section 20(4), the Commission is of the opinion that it is not likely to have any appreciable adverse effect on competition in India. Where the parties' overlapping segments are in the nature of incidental sales, and the parties' presence in those segments is negligible, the proposed combination is not likely to change the competitive dynamics of those segments and cannot be the basis for withholding approval. In a horizontal overlap, a combined market share not exceeding 10%, or an increment to market share below 5%, indicates that the combination is not likely to lead to competition concerns in that segment, even where the combined share lies between 10% and 15%, provided the increment remains below 5%. Where the parties are present at different stages of the value chain, the combination is not likely to confer any ability or incentive on the combined entity to engage in foreclosure strategies, and it therefore raises no appreciable adverse effect in the vertical context. An approval under Section 31(1) remains liable to revocation if the information furnished by the parties is later found to be incorrect.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Notice under Section 6(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 jointly given by by JSW Steel Limited, Creixent Special Steels Limited and JSW Ispat Special Products Limited
CORAM:
Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta Chairperson
Ms. Sangeeta Verma Member
Mr. Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi Member
Order under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002
1. On 8 July 2022, the Competition Commission of India (Commission) received a Notice under Section 6(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 (Act), jointly given by JSW Steel Limited (JSW Steel), Creixent Special Steels Limited (CSSL) and JSW Ispat Special Products Limited (JSW Ispat) (collectively referred to as Parties) (hereinafter, JSW Steel and JSW Ispat are collectively referred to as JSW Companies). The Notice was filed pursuant to the resolutions passed by the board of directors of JSW Steel, CSSL and JSW Ispat on 27 May 2022 approving the Scheme of Arrangement (Scheme) amongst, inter alia, JSW Companies and CSSL.
2. The proposed combination involves the amalgamation of CSSL and JSW Ispat with and into JSW Steel (Proposed Combination), to be effected through the Scheme.
3. JSW Steel, listed on the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (NSE) and BSE Limited (BSE), is the flagship company of JSW group and is primarily engaged in the manufacture and sale of a diverse range of iron and steel products in India and abroad. It has five manufacturing units located across Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and Maharashtra in India. As on date, JSW Steel has: (i) operationalised, directly, thirteen, and indirectly, one iron ore mines across Karnataka, Odisha and Chhattisgarh; and (ii) acquired one coal block in Jharkhand.
4. JSW Ispat, listed on NSE and BSE, is engaged in the manufacture of iron (including pig iron and sponge iron) (Iron), semi-finished steel (Semis), long steel products (Long Products), etc. JSW Ispat has two manufacturing facilities, in Raipur and Raigarh, in the state of Chhattisgarh. In 2018, the consortium of Apollo Global Management LLC (Apollo) (through AION Investments Private II Limited (AION)) and JSW Steel, collectively acquired 74.29% of the total equity share capital and management control of JSW Ispat, pursuant to the resolution plan approved by NCLT under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Accordingly, JSW Ispat is presently jointly controlled by Apollo and JSW Steel.
5. CSSL is inter alia engaged in the business of trading in steel and steel products and holding investments. It is the holding company of JSW Ispat. CSSL is presently jointly controlled by Apollo (through AION) and JSW Steel.
6. As regards identification of overlaps, it is noted that CSSL is primarily engaged in the business of trading in steel and steel products on behalf of JSW Ispat and, accordingly, the overlaps were mapped between JSW Steel and JSW Ispat. It was further observed that JSW Companies have presence throughout the value chain of steel production, viz., areas of: (i) Raw inputs such as iron ore; (ii) Processed inputs such as coke, power and pellets; (iii) Iron/Direct Reduced Iron (DRI); (iv) Semis; (v) Long products such as TMT Bars, wire rods, merchant bars, structural products; and (vi) Flat steel products such as hot-rolled products, cold-rolled products and colour coated products. However, market facing overlaps are observed in the areas/segments of power, pellets, pig iron, sponge iron, Semis, TMT bars and merchant bars. The aforesaid presence of JSW/JSW Ispat in the value chain of steel production also leads to vertical relationships.
7. As regards the segments of power and pellets, it has been submitted that generation/manufacturing and sale of power and pellets is not the primary business activity of JSW Steel and JSW Ispat, and any revenue generated, which is minuscule, is by virtue of sale of excess power and pellets. The Commission observed that JSW Steel and JSW Ispat have negligible presence in terms of excess power and the unutilised excess pellets sold in the open market in FY 2021-22 and accordingly, the Proposed Combination is not likely to result in any change in the competition dynamics of these segments.
8. The Commission noted the presence of JSW Companies in the aforesaid segments of iron, semi-finished steel and long steel products; and sub-segments of iron, viz., sponge iron and pig iron; and sub-segments of long steel products, in terms of domestic sales, and observed that the combined market shares do not exceed 10% for all segments/sub-segments except the segment of semi-finished steel in which the combined market share is estimated to be in the range of 10% to 15%. The increment to the market shares resulting from the Proposed Combination is less than 5% in each of the aforesaid segment/sub-segment. Considering the details of the presence of the Parties across the value chain, it appears that the Proposed Combination is not likely to lead to competition concerns in any of the segments horizontally, nor is it likely to confer any ability/incentive on the part of the combined entity to engage in any foreclosure strategies in the vertical context.
9. Considering the material on record, including the details provided in the Notice and the assessment of the Proposed Combination based on the factors stated in Section 20(4) of the Act, the Commission is of the opinion that the Proposed Combination is not likely to have any appreciable adverse effect on competition in India. Therefore, the Commission approves the Proposed Combination under Section 31(1) of the Act.
10. The order may be revoked if, at any time, the information provided by the Parties is found to be incorrect.
11. The information provided by the Parties shall be treated as confidential in terms of and subject to the provisions of Section 57 of the Act.
12. The Secretary is directed to communicate to the Parties accordingly.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free