Jointly by Tianjin Tianhai Investment Company, China and GCL Acquisition Inc., USA — Combination C-2016/03/383
- Case No.C-2016/03/383
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A combination notified under s.6(2) that falls within s.5(a) may be approved under s.31(1) where, having regard to the notice and the factors in s.20(4), the Commission is of the opinion that it is not likely to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India. The absence of any horizontal overlap between the parties' activities in India, and the absence of any vertical relationship between their businesses before and after the combination, are sufficient grounds for forming that opinion where the acquirers and their group have no business or presence in India. An approval granted on the basis of information furnished by the parties remains conditional on that information being correct, and the approval stands revoked if the information is found to be incorrect.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Notice under Section 6 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 given by Tianjin Tianhai Investment Company Limited and GCL Acquisition Inc. CORAM:
Mr. Devender Kumar Sikri Chairperson
Mr. S.L. Bunker Member
Mr. Sudhir Mital Member
Mr. U.C. Nahta Member
Mr. M. S. Sahoo Member
Mr. G.P. Mittal Member
Legal Representative: Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co.
Order under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (“Act”)
1. On 18.03.2016, the Competition Commission of India (“Commission”) received a notice given by Tianjin Tianhai Investment Company Limited (“TTIC”) and GCL Acquisition Inc. (“GCL”) (hereinafter TTIC and GCL together are referred to as “Acquirers”) under sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Act, pursuant to the execution of a ‘Agreement and Plan of Merger’ dated 17.02.2016 (“Agreement”) between Acquirers and Ingram Micro Inc. (“Ingram” / “Target”). Hereinafter, TTIC, GCL and Ingram collectively are referred to as “Parties”.
2. As stated in the notice, the proposed combination relates to the acquisition of more than 50% shares1 in Ingram by TTIC and GCL, whereby GCL will merge with and into Ingram, with 1 As stated in the notice, the exact percentage of ownership over Ingram is yet to be determined as (a) HNA might also hold a direct interest, and (b) minority investors might hold small, non-controlling interests. As further stated in the notice, HNA intends to acquire a majority of shares and sole control over Ingram by way of proposed combination.
Fair Competition For Greater Good latter being the surviving entity (“Proposed Combination”)2. It has been stated in the notice that GCL is a wholly owned subsidiary of TTIC and TTIC is controlled by HNA Group Company Limited (“HNA”). Therefore, after the proposed combination, Ingram will become a wholly owned subsidiary of TTIC and will come under the control of HNA.
3. The Proposed Combination falls under section 5(a) of the Act.
4. In terms of Regulation 14 of Competition Commission of India (Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to combinations) Regulations, 2011, vide letter dated 26.04.2016, the Acquirers were required to furnish certain information by 29.04.2016, which was submitted on 03.05.2016 after seeking extension of time.
5. HNA, a company existing under the laws of the People's Republic of China (“PRC”), is stated to be engaged in the businesses of aviation, real estate, financial services, tourism and logistics, among others.
6. TTIC, a joint stock company existing under the laws of PRC, is listed on Shanghai Stock Exchange. It is a subsidiary of HNA and provides shipping (marine transportation) services through five China-South Korea shipping routes and three domestic shipping routes within China. As stated in the notice, TTIC is controlled by HNA.
7. GCL, a newly incorporated company under the laws of Delaware (USA), is a wholly owned subsidiary of TTIC and is not engaged in any business activity.
8. As per the information provided in the notice, the Acquirers and HNA are not engaged in any business activity in India and have no presence in India.
9. Ingram, a company incorporated in Delaware (USA) and listed on New York Stock Exchange, is stated to be active globally in distribution and related services of information technology (“IT”) products and other electronic products. Ingram is stated to be present in India through its four wholly-owned subsidiaries namely, Ingram Micro India Private Ltd., Brightpoint India Private Ltd., Ingram Micro India SSC Ltd. and Surajami Investments & Trading Company Ltd. In India, Ingram is engaged in the business of wholesale distribution services of IT products, consumer electronics, mobility products and related services (IT support services to entities within Ingram Micro group).
10. As stated in the notice, there is no horizontal overlap between the activities of the Parties as none among TTIC, GCL and HNA is engaged in the wholesale distribution of electronic
2 It has been stated in the notice that separately, in a distinct & unrelated transaction, Ingram is proposing to acquire Ensim Corporation (“Ensim”) and certain business/assets of Four Loops Solution Pvt. Ltd. (“Four Loops”) by way of a separate ‘agreement & plan of merger’ dated 17th February 2016 entered into between Ingram, Durif Merger Sub Corporation (wholly owned subsidiary of Ingram), Ensim and Mr. David J. Wippich (principal shareholder of Ensim) (“Proposed Ensim Transaction”), which is exempt from notification under Section 6(2) of the Act by virtue of Notifications No S.O. 482 (E) and/or No. S.O. 674 (E) issued by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India on 04.03.2011 and 04.03.2016, respectively, on account of Ensim’s Indian turnover being INR 0.004 Crores in the last financial year.
Fair Competition For Greater Good products3 or related services in India. Further, there is no vertical relationship between businesses of the Parties, both before & after the Proposed Combination.
11. Considering the facts on record and the details provided in the notice given under sub-section (2) of section 6 of the Act and assessment of the proposed combination on the basis of factors stated in sub-section (4) of Section 20 of the Act, the Commission is of the opinion that the Proposed Combination is not likely to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India and, therefore, the Commission hereby approves the same under sub-section (1) of Section 31 of the Act.
12. This order shall stand revoked if, at any time, the information provided by the Parties is found to be incorrect.
13. The information provided by the Parties is confidential at this stage subject to provisions of Section 57 of the Act.
14. The Secretary is directed to communicate to the Parties accordingly.
3 As stated in the notice, electronic products collectively inlcude IT products (such as servers, storage devices, networking products), consumer electronics (such as TVs, DVD players, laptops), and mobility devices (such as feature-phones and smartphones). As further staed in the notice, IT products are distinct from IT enabled services and from services related to IT products.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free