Jointly by TDK Corporation, Japan and Toshiba Corporation, Japan — Combination C-2016/09/437
- Case No.C-2016/09/437
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A combination is not likely to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India, and may be approved under section 31(1), where neither party is involved in the manufacture or sale of the relevant product in India, so that no horizontal overlap exists in the Indian market. Where the parties have no vertical relationship in India, the absence of such a relationship is a ground for finding no appreciable adverse effect on competition in India. Upstream or downstream dealings that occur only at the worldwide level, or that are de minimis, do not establish a vertical relationship in India for this purpose. Approval under section 31(1) rests on the Commission's assessment of the information in the notice under section 6(2), applying the factors in section 20(4), and any such approval stands revoked if the information furnished by the parties is later found to be incorrect.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA 13th December, 2016 Notice under Section 6(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 filed by TDK Corporation and Toshiba Corporation CORAM: Mr. Devender Kumar Sikri Chairperson Mr. S. L. Bunker Member Sudhir Mital Member Mr. Augustine Peter Member Mr. U. C. Nahta Member Mr. G. P. Mittal Member Legal Representative of the Parties: Shardul Amarchand Mangladas, New Delhi Order under Section 31 (1) of the Competition Act, 2002
1. On 30th September 2016, the Competition Commission of India (“Commission”) received a notice jointly given by TDK Corporation (“TDK”) and Toshiba Corporation (“Toshiba”), under sub-section (2) of section 6 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“Act”). (hereinafter TDK and Toshiba are collectively referred to as “Parties”).
2. The proposed combination envisages setting up of joint venture between TDK and Toshiba wherein TDK proposes to incorporate a new entity TDK Automotive Technologies Corporation (“TDK Auto”), in which Toshiba would acquire 25% shares and the For Greater Good remaining 75% shares would be held by TDK. Subsequently, as stated in the notice, Toshiba (or its group company (s)) would assign its contracts to TDK Auto, which would engage in the development, manufacture and sales of automotive inverters for hybrid vehicles (“HV”), plug-in hybrid vehicles (“PHV”) and electric vehicles (“EV”).
3. As stated in the notice, TDK is a Japanese multinational electronics company which develops, manufactures and sells electronic components including energy devices (rechargeable batteries), capacitors, magnets and power supplies. These are used as automobile components and in a wide range of electronic devices such as smartphones, tablets and industrial equipment. In India, TDK sells a range of electronic/electric equipments such as capacitors, inductors (coils), EMC components, RF/saw components and modules, voltage/ current/ temperature protection devices, sensor and sensor systems etc. TDK is present in India through its wholly owned subsidiary EPCOS India Private Limited which is engaged in manufacturing of film capacitors and sells electronic components. As stated in the notice, TDK does not sell/manufacture automotive inverters in India.
4. Toshiba, a Japanese multinational conglomerate corporation headquartered in Tokyo, Japan, is engaged in manufacture of advanced electronic and electrical product & systems. Toshiba is present in India through its subsidiaries namely: (a) Toshiba India Pvt. Ltd.; (b) TPSC (India) Pvt. Ltd.; (c) Toshiba JSW Power Systems Pvt. Ltd.; (d) Toshiba Johnson Elevators (India) Private Limited; (e) Toshiba Software (India) Private Limited; (f) Toshiba Transmission & Distribution Systems (India) Private Limited; (g) Toshiba Logistics India Private Limited; (h) UEM India Private Limited; (i) UEM Infrastructure Private Limited; (j) Westinghouse Electric India Private Limited; and (K) Landis + Gyr Limited. As stated, in India, Toshiba is engaged in the business of, interalia, railway systems, elevators, electronic devices and personal computers. It has been stated in the notice that Toshiba manufactures and sells automotive inverters. However, automotive inverters are not sold by Toshiba in India.
For Greater Good
5. The Commission observed that the proposed combination pertains to manufacture and sale of automotive inverters. It has been stated in the notice that from the year 2020 onwards, many countries propose to impose more stringent regulation of automobile exhaust emissions in an effort to prevent/reduce air pollution and global warming. This trend is expected to greatly affect the global automobile market, contributing to an increase in demand for HV and PHV in the global market and greatly increased use of EV, fuel cell, and other eco-friendly vehicles. It is observed that Indian market is at a nascent stage in relation to EV and HV and approximately 1000 EV cars may have been sold in India so far. However, the said market is expected to grow in the coming years.
6. The Commission observed that neither TDK nor Toshiba is involved in the manufacture and sale of automotive inverters in India and accordingly there is no horizontal overlap between the Parties.
7. The Commission also observed that there is no vertical relationship between the Parties in India. It has been stated in the notice that TDK, at a worldwide level, produces some components that are used in the production of Toshiba’s automotive inverters. However, as stated in the notice, sale of these products of Toshiba is miniscule. Further, it is noted that TDK has also supplied certain products to Toshiba. However, the said products are not used for manufacture of automotive inverters.
8. Considering the facts on record and the details provided in the notice given under sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Act and assessment on the basis of factors stated in sub-section (4) of Section 20 of the Act, the Commission is of the opinion that the proposed combination is not likely to have appreciable adverse effect on competition in India and therefore, the Commission, approved the same under sub-section (1) of Section 31 of the Act.
For Greater Good 9. This order shall stand revoked if, at any time, the information provided by the Parties is found to be incorrect.
10. The Information provided by the Parties is confidential at this stage in terms of and subject to provisions of Section 57 of the Act.
11. The Secretary is directed to communicate to the Parties accordingly.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free