Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Jointly by Koch Industries Inc., USA and Guardian Industries Corp., USA — Combination C-2016/11/461

Competition Commission Of India4 January 2017

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

A proposed combination that transfers sole control of a target from joint control to a single acquirer is not likely to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India where the target has no horizontal overlaps or vertical relationships in India with the businesses of the acquirer group, since the change in control then does not alter competitive dynamics in any Indian market. Such a combination, assessed against the factors in sub-section (4) of section 20, may be approved under sub-section (1) of section 31. A notice under sub-section (2) of section 6 that is filed late because the filing fee, remitted before the deadline, was credited to the Commission's account only after it, may be admitted without initiating proceedings under section 43A where the delay is short and attributable to the fee-crediting timeline.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

Fair CompetitionFor Greater GoodCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA(Combination Registration No. C- 2016/11/461)

04.01.2017 Notice filed under sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Competition Act, 2002 jointly given by Koch Industries Inc. and Guardian Industries Corp.

CORAM: Mr. Devender Kumar Sikri Chairperson

Mr. S. L. Bunker Member

Mr. Sudhir Mital Member

Mr. U. C. Nahta Member

Mr. G. P. Mittal Member

Legal Representative: AZB & Partners Order under sub-section (1) of Section 31 of the Act

1. On 30.11.2016, the Competition Commission of India (“Commission”) received a notice under sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“Act”) jointly given by Koch Industries Inc. (“KII”) and Guardian Industries Corp. (“Guardian”) (hereinafter KII and Guardian are collectively referred to as the “Parties”). The notice was filed pursuant to the execution of Agreement and Plan of Merger between the Parties dated 25.10.2016 and Board

For Greater Good resolutions passed by the Parties, each dated 25.10.2016. The Parties have submitted that the filing fee was remitted to the Commission on 22.11.2016 which could be credited in the account of the Commission only on 30.11.2016, leading to a delay in filing of notice by 5 days. The Commission considered the submissions of the Parties along with the supporting documents and decided to admit the notice without initiating proceedings under the provisions of Section 43A of the Act.

2. At present, KII, (through its affiliates) owns 44.50 percent outstanding shares of Guardian. The proposed combination involves acquisition of remaining 55.50 percent outstanding shares of Guardian by KGIC Merger Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of KII. Thus, pursuant to the proposed combination, KII would acquire the sole ownership of Guardian (“Proposed Combination”).

3. KII, a privately held United States of America (“USA”) corporation, owns a group of companies engaged in diverse businesses such as refining and chemicals and biofuels; forest and consumer products; fertilizers; polymers and fibers; electronic components; process and pollution control equipment and technologies; commodity trading; minerals; energy; ranching; and investments.

4. Guardian, a privately held USA corporation, along with its subsidiaries, is active worldwide in manufacturing float glass and fabricated glass products and coated injection moulded plastic parts for automotive and other applications. In the USA, Guardian is also active in distributing building materials for commercial and residential applications.

5. The Commission observed that Guardian is present in India by way of Gujarat Guardian Limited (“GGL”), a joint venture with Modi Rubber Ltd. GGL is involved in manufacturing of float glass in India producing various categories of glass including architectural glass, mirror and decorative glass and high performance glass. The Commission observed that there are no horizontal overlaps/vertical relationships between the businesses of the Parties in India.

For Greater Good Accordingly, the Commission noted that the transfer from joint to sole control of KII in Guardian is not likely to result in change in competition dynamics in any market in India.

6. Considering facts on record and details provided in the notice given under sub-section (2) of section 6 of the Act and assessment of the proposed combination on the basis of factors stated in sub-section (4) of section 20 of the Act, the Commission is of the opinion that the Proposed Combination is not likely to have appreciable adverse effect on competition in India and therefore, the Commission, approved the same under sub-section (1) of section 31 of the Act.

7. This order shall stand revoked if, at any time, the information provided by the Parties is found to be incorrect.

8. The information provided by the Parties is confidential at this stage in terms of and subject to provisions of Section 57 of the Act.

9. The Secretary is directed to communicate to the Parties accordingly.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free