Jaswinder Singh Ahuja & Anr vs Sunshine Tradetower Pvt. Ltd
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 735 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority's deferral of proceedings under a Supreme Court stay order operating against the corporate debtor is not interfered with on appeal, since a stay of the corporate insolvency resolution process against the corporate debtor justifies deferring the hearing of the insolvency application; the appellant's claim that it is not a financial creditor under the Explanation to Section 5(8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 does not displace that stay, and the appellant's remedy in respect of the scope of the stay lies in approaching the Supreme Court for clarification.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 735 of 2019
IN THE MATTER OF:
Jaswinder Singh Ahuja & Anr. ...Appellants
Versus
Sunshine Tradetower Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant : Mr. Majoj Kumar and Ms. R. Gayathri Manasa, Advocates
ORDER
19.07.2019 The Appellant has challenged the order dated 23rd May, 2019
passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal),
Principal Bench, New Delhi, which reads as follows :
"There is a stay of proceedings before this
Tribunal issued by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Civil
Appeal No. 597 of 2019 in respect of corporate debtor.
Accordingly, hearing is deferred to 06.08.2019."
Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the Appellant has not
claimed to be a 'Financial Creditor' in the light of the 'Explanation' given below
u/s 5(8) of the 'Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016'. The Appellant has
disbursed the amount of the time value of money independently and, therefore,
pendency of the case in 'Civil Appeal No. 597 of 2019' before the Hon'ble Supreme
Court will not be applicable to him. However, as we find that the 'corporate -2-
insolvency resolution process' has been stayed against the 'Corporate Debtor',
we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order dated 23rd May, 2019.
However, this will not come in the way of the Appellant to move before the
Hon'ble Supreme Court for clarification that other 'Financial Creditors' will not
be affected in view of the order of stay passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court
against the 'Corporate Debtor' which was filed at the instance of the Allottees.
The appeal stands disposed of with aforesaid observations.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Kanthi Narahari ] Member (Technical) /ns/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 735 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free