J.C. Flowers Asset Reconstruction ... vs Smaaash Leisure Limited
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2103 of 2024
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority's dismissal of a Section 7 application on the sole ground that the default date fell within the Section 10A moratorium period is upheld, but the creditor is free to file a fresh Section 7 application for any default committed after the expiry of the Section 10A period.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE MATTER OF: J.C. Flowers Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant Versus Smaash Leisure Ltd. Formerly known as PVR BLUO Entertainment Ltd. ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant : Mr. Krishnendu Dutta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Naveen Hegde, Mr. Akshay Puri and Ms. Niharika Sharma, Advocates.
For Respondent :
ORDER
(Hybrid Mode)
27.11.2024 : Heard Counsel for the Appellant.
2. This Appeal has been filed against an Order dated 06.09.2024 passed
by the Learned Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal,
Mumbai Bench, Court - II) in C.P. (IB) No. 103/MB/2024, by which Order,
Section 7 Application filed by the Appellant has been dismissed on the ground
that it is barred by Section 10A. Adjudicating Authority has noticed that the
date of default was mentioned as 07.12.2020 which was clearly hit by Section
10A, hence the Application was rejected.
3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant contends that default took place
during 10A period and also default continued thereafter interest being
payable on monthly basis in terms of the facility documents and Adjudicating
Authority ought to have maintained the Petition for the default subsequent to
10A period.
4. Learned Counsel for the Appellant has relied on the Order of this
Tribunal dated 12.01.2023, passed in Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 28/2023 in
the matter of `Small Industries Development Bank of India' Vs.
`Sambandh Finserve Private Limited', where although the Appeal
challenging an Order dismissing Section 7 Application was dismissed but
liberty was granted to Appellant to file fresh Application in accordance with
law for the default committed subsequent to 10A period.
5. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the Appellant may be
given liberty to initiate proceedings in accordance with law for default which
has been committed by the Corporate Debtor subsequent to 10A period.
6. In view of the aforesaid, we while upholding the Order of the
Adjudicating Authority dismissing Section 7 Application grant liberty to the
Appellant to file a fresh proceeding under Section 7 in accordance with law
for default committed subsequent to 10A period.
With these observations, the Appeal is disposed of.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)
[Arun Baroka] Member (Technical) himanshu/nn
Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 2103 of 2024 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free