Miss Lucy
← All judgments

International Creations Pvt.Ltd.,, ... vs Assessee

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal12 June 2015

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

A penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be sustained merely because an addition has been made in quantum proceedings on the basis of estimated gross profits; quantum and penalty proceedings stand on different footings, and an addition does not automatically attract penalty. Where the addition rests on estimation without concrete evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars, and the decline in profit is explicable by a fall in turnover, the penalty cannot be imposed on the strength of the quantum addition alone.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL"B" BENCH, AHMEDABADBEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL VICE PRESIDENT ANDSHRI S.S. GODARA JUDICIAL MEMBERITAs No.312/Ahd/2012A.Y.2005-06M/s. International Creations Vs ITO, Ward-1(2), Surat.Pvt. Ltd.,561, Adarsh Market,Ring Road, Surat.PAN: AAACI 8917P(Appellant) (Respondent)Revenue by Shri M.K. Singh, Sr.D.R.,:Assessee(s) by : None

सुनवाई क तार ख/Date o f Hearing : 22/06/2015 घोषणा क तार ख /Date o f Prono unceme nt: 12/06/2015

आदेश /O R D E R

PER S.S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER

This assessee's appeal for A.Y.2005-06, arises from order of CIT(A)-I, Surat dated 30.11.2011 passed in case no.CAS- I/112/2011-12 upholding penalty sum of Rs.3,76,260/- imposed by the Assessing Officer in proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, in short 'the Act'.

2. Case called twice. None has come present at the assessee behest. It has chosen to file return submissions on 11.5.2015.

ITA No.312/Ahd/2012 M/s. International Creations Pvt. Lted.

For A.Y. 2005-06 -2-

We take on record the same and proceed ex-parte against the assessee.

3. The assessee-company trades in art silk cloth. It filed nil income return on 30.10.2005 with book profits of Rs.91,664/-. The Assessing Officer framed a regular assessment making addition of Rs.10,75,020/- on account of suppression of gross profits after rejecting assessee's books. He also initiated penalty proceedings against the assessee alleging concealment and furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. The assessee preferred appeal. The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's action in order dated 7.8.2008. We infer from the case file that quantum proceedings attain finality at this stage.

4. The Assessing Officer took up penalty proceedings. The assessee does not appear to have filed any reply in furtherance to show cause notice. The Assessing Officer passed penalty order dated 25.3.2010 reiterating his findings in assessment orders after rejecting assessee's books of accounts and re- estimation of gross profits thereby treating the same as an act of concealment. He accordingly imposed minimum penalty of Rs.3,76,260/-. The same stands confirmed in the lower appellate order. This leaves the assessee aggrieved.

ITA No.312/Ahd/2012 M/s. International Creations Pvt. Lted.

For A.Y. 2005-06 -3-

5. We have heard the Revenue and perused the case file. There is no dispute that the present is a case of re-estimation of gross profits in assessee's case after rejection of its books. The assessee's gross profits in assessment year 2003-04, 2004-05 and impugned assessment year 2005-06 turn out to be 10.3%, 9.5% and 6.13% respectively. The Assessing Officer in quantum proceedings adopted average thereof @9.3% for the reason that sum of his letters issued to various creditors had been returned unserved, assessee could not explain difference between processing charges of the cloth ranging between Rs.3.73 per meter to Rs.9.95 per meter and also quoted lack of details in quality gradation of the stock leading to its valuation. The authorities below treated as a case covered by section 271(1)(c) liable to be penalized. However, the fact remains that present is a case of an estimated gross profits additions based on estimation without any concrete evidence. It transpires from the case file that the assessee's gross profit for assessment year 2004-05 @9.5% arose from turnover of Rs.14.15 crores as against 6.1% out of Rs.2.82 crores in the impugned assessment years. We observe on the basis of these facts that decline in the assessee's gross profits is due to drastic fall in turnover as well. We reiterate settled proposition of law that quantum and penalty stands on different footings and each and every addition does not lead to automatic imposition of penalty as per the decision ITA No.312/Ahd/2012 M/s. International Creations Pvt. Lted.

For A.Y. 2005-06 -4-

of hon'ble apex court in Reliance Petro Chemicals 322 ITR 158. Therefore, we agree with the assessee's pleadings and delete the impugned penalty of Rs.3,76,260/-.

6. The assessee's appeal is allowed.

Order pronounced in the Court on this day, the 12th June, 2015 at Ahmedabad.

Sd/- Sd/- (G.D. AGRAWAL) (S.S. GODARA) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad; Dated /06/2015 Prabhat Kr. Kesarwani, Sr. P.S. आदेश क त ल प अ े षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant 2. यथ / The Respondent. 3. संबं धत आयकर आयु त / Concerned CIT

4. आयकर आयु त(अपील) / The CIT(A)-III, Ahmedabad

5. वभागीय त न ध, आयकर अपील य अ धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad

6. गाड फाईल / Guard file.

आदेशानुस ार / BY ORDER,

उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.Registrar) आयकर अपील य अ धकरण, अहमदाबाद / ITAT, Ahmedabad

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free