Interim order against the past Directors of Sun-Plant Business Limited, viz. Shri Girija Shankar Kumar
- CitationWTM/SR/SEBI–ERO/IMD/177/11/2015
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A director of a company who was in office when the company made an unlawful public issue of securities, and who personally engaged in mobilising funds from the public in that capacity, is answerable for the resulting violations of the Companies Act, 1956, the SEBI Act, 1992, and the DIP Guidelines read with the ICDR Regulations, 2009. Liability attaches to every director who is an officer in default, and to every director responsible for the prospectus or issue. Where the Board is of the view, on the material before it, that such a director has violated those provisions, it may under Sections 11, 11(4), 11A and 11B of the SEBI Act, 1992 pass interim directions restraining him from soliciting money from the public, from accessing the securities market, and from dealing in securities, and requiring disclosure of his assets, "till further orders." Such interim directions are passed on a prima facie finding of violation and are without prejudice to final directions, which may
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
WTM/SR/SEBI – ERO/IMD/177/11/2015 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA, MUMBAI CORAM: S. RAMAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER Under Sections 11, 11(4), 11A and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against the past Directors of Sun-Plant Business Limited, viz. Shri Girija Shankar Kumar (PAN: AKAPK2774R; DIN: 00355512) and Shri Awdhesh Kumar Singh (PAN: AKQPS6527G; DIN: 00301404).
1. Securities and Exchange Board of India ("SEBI") vide an Order bearing no. WTM/PS/14/ERO/JUNE/2015 dated June 3, 2015 ("Final Order"), passed certain directions as mentioned at paragraph 20 thereof, against Sun-Plant Business Limited ("SBL") and its Directors, viz. Shri Basant Kumar Sasmal, Shri Amit Kumar Chowdhury and Shri Mahesh Chandra Prasad, for violating the provisions of Section 56, Section 60 read with Section 2(36), Section 73 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Section 27(2) of the SEBI Act, 1992 (“SEBI Act”), the SEBI (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000 (“DIP Guidelines”) read with the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 (“ICDR Regulations, 2009”), by engaging in fund mobilising activity from the public, through the issue of Redeemable Preference Shares ("Offer of RPS"). 2. As per the findings contained in the Final Order, the offer and allotment of Redeemable Preference Shares made by SBL to during the Financial Years 2005–06, 2006–07 and 2007–08, has been held to be a public issue of securities in accordance with the first proviso to Section 67(3) of the Companies Act, 1956.
3.1 It has now come to SEBI's notice that the following persons were earlier Directors of SBL during the Offer of RPS –
Sr. Name PAN DIN Date of Date of No appointment cessation 1. Girija Shankar Kumar AKAPK2774R 00355512 April 29, 2002 April 30, 2011 2. Awdhesh Kumar Singh AKQPS6527G 00301404 April 29, 2002 April 30, 2011
3.2 In this context, it is noted that – i. Section 56(1) and 56(3) read with Section 56(4) of the Companies Act, 1956, imposes liability for compliance of the aforesaid provisions, on the company, every Director and other persons responsible for the issuance of the prospectus.
ii. Section 60 of the Companies Act, 1956, imposes liability for compliance of the aforesaid provision, on the company and every person who is a party to the issue of the Prospectus.
iii. Section 73(2) of Companies Act, 1956, imposes liability for compliance of Section 73, on the company and every Director of the company who is an Officer in default. iv. Section 27(2) of the SEBI Act provides SEBI with inter alia the power to proceed against Director(s) of companies who have illegally mobilized funds from the public through the issue of securities. v. As far as the DIP Guidelines (read with ICDR Regulations) is concerned, the company and its Directors are equally liable for any non–compliance with the provisions contained therein i.e. Clause 2.1.1, 2.1.4–2.1.5, 2.8, 4.1, 4.11, 4.14, 5.3.1, 5.3.3, 5.3.5– 5.3.6, 5.4, 5.6, 5.6A, 5.7–5.10, 5.12.1, 5.13, 6.0, 8.3, 8.8.1, 9, 10.1 and 10.5.
3.3 Upon a consideration of the aforementioned paragraphs, I am of the view that Shri Girija Shankar Kumar and Shri Awdhesh Kumar Singh, were also engaged in fund mobilising activity from the public, in their capacity as Directors of SBL, through the Offer of RPS and as a result of the aforesaid activity, have violated the aforementioned provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the SEBI Act, the DIP Guidelines (read with ICDR Regulations).
4. In view of the alleged violations by the abovementioned past Directors, I, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under Sections 11, 11(4), 11A and 11B of the SEBI Act, hereby issue the following directions – i. The past Directors of SBL, viz. Shri Girija Shankar Kumar (PAN: AKAPK2774R; DIN: 00355512) and Shri Awdhesh Kumar Singh (PAN: AKQPS6527G; DIN: 00301404), are prohibited from issuing prospectus or any offer document or issue advertisement for soliciting money from the public for the issue of securities, in any manner whatsoever, either directly or indirectly, till further orders;
ii. The abovementioned past Directors of SBL are restrained from accessing the securities market and further prohibited from buying, selling or otherwise dealing in the securities market, either directly or indirectly, till further directions; iii. The abovementioned past Directors of SBL shall provide a full inventory of all their assets and properties.
5.1 The abovementioned past Directors of SBL are advised to show cause as to why suitable directions/prohibitions under Sections 11(1), 11(4), 11A and 11B of the SEBI Act, Section 73(2) of the Companies Act read with Section 27(2) of the SEBI Act, the DIP Guidelines (read with ICDR Regulations) including the following, should not be taken/imposed against them:
i. Directing them jointly and severally to refund money collected through the Offer of Preference Shares alongwith interest, if any, promised to investors therein; ii. Directing them not to issue prospectus or any offer document or issue advertisement for soliciting money from the public for the issue of securities, in any manner whatsoever, either directly or indirectly, for an appropriate period; iii. Directing them to refrain from accessing the securities market and prohibiting them from buying, selling or otherwise dealing in securities for an appropriate period.
5.2 The abovementioned past Directors of SBL, may, within 21 days from the date of receipt of this Order, file their reply, if any, to this Order and may also indicate whether they desire to avail themselves an opportunity of personal hearing on a date and time to be fixed on a specific request made in that regard.
6. This Order is without prejudice to the right of SEBI to take any other action that may be initiated against the abovementioned past Directors of SBL in accordance with law.
7. This Order shall be read with the Final Order, copy of which is enclosed with this Order.
8. A copy of this Order shall be served on all recognized stock exchanges and depositories for necessary action.
Place: Mumbai S. RAMAN Date: November 20, 2015 WHOLE TIME MEMBER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free