Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Interim Order against the past directors of MARS Agro Farm Developers Limited viz. Shri Ajigul Haque, Shri Seikh Sarafat Ali, Shri Arup Bhattacharyya and Shri Sheik Saukat Ali

Securities And Exchange Board Of India7 July 2016

Interim / procedural order — not a final adjudication. Do not cite as a holding.

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

A person who was a director of a company during an unlawful public issue of securities, and who was in office when the company mobilised funds through that issue, is prima facie a person engaged in fund mobilisation from the public in that capacity. Liability under sections 56, 60 and 73 of the Companies Act, 1956 attaches to directors and persons responsible for the prospectus or issue, and section 27(2) of the SEBI Act empowers SEBI to proceed against directors of companies that have illegally mobilised funds from the public through the issue of securities. Where such a director is prima facie found to have violated these provisions, SEBI may under sections 11, 11(4), 11A and 11B of the SEBI Act issue interim directions, pending show-cause proceedings on final relief, restraining the director from soliciting money from the

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

WTM/SR/SEBI – ERO/IMD/31/07/2016 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA, MUMBAI CORAM: S. RAMAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER Under Sections 11, 11(4), 11A and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against the past Directors of MARS Agrofarm Developers Limited, viz. Shri Ajigul Haque (DIN: 03158904), Shri Seikh Sarafat Ali (PAN: AGWPA0991L; DIN: 03247659), Shri Arup Bhattacharyya (PAN: ASYPB9377P; DIN: 03159195)and ShriSheik Saukat Ali(PAN: ACOPA1462G; DIN: 03158954).

1. Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) vide an Order bearing no. WTM/PS/167/ERO/FEB/2016 dated February 26, 2016 (“Final Order”), passed certain directions as mentioned at paragraph 18 thereof, against MARS Agrofarm Developers Limited (“MADL”)and its Directors, viz. Shri Sekh Sahadat Ali, Shri Abu Taleb Mohammodand Shri Tushar Kanti Samanta,for violating the provisions of Section 56, Section 60 read with Section 2(36), Section 73 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Section 27(2) of the SEBI Act, 1992 (“SEBI Act”), by engaging in fund mobilising activity from the public, through theissue of Redeemable Preference Shares (“Offer of RPS”). 2. As per the findings contained in the Final Order, the offer and allotment of Redeemable Preference Shares made by MADL to 237 investors during the Financial Year 2010–2011 (wherein the fund mobilized was 25 Lakhs), has been held to be a public issue of securitiesin accordance withthe first proviso to Section 67(3) of the Companies Act, 1956.

3.1 It has now come to SEBI’s notice that the following persons were earlier Directors of MADL during the Offer of RPS –

Sr. Name PAN DIN Date of Date of No appointment cessation 1. Ajigul Haque Not Available 03158904 01/11/2010 05/12/2011 2. Seikh Sarafat Ali AGWPA0991L 03247659 01/11/2010 24/12/2011 3. Arup ASYPB9377P 03159195 01/11/2010 29/03/2011 Bhattacharyya 4. Sheik Saukat Ali ACOPA1462G 03158954 01/11/2010 05/12/2011

3.2 In this context, it is noted that – i. Section 56(1) and 56(3) read with Section 56(4) of the Companies Act, 1956, imposes liability for compliance of the aforesaid provisions, on the company, every Director and other persons responsible for the issuance of the prospectus.

ii. Section 60 of the Companies Act, 1956, imposes liability for compliance of the aforesaid provision, on the company and every person who is a party to the issue of the Prospectus.

iii. Section 73(2) of Companies Act, 1956, imposes liability for compliance of Section 73, on the company and every Director of the company who is an Officer in default. iv. Section 27(2) of the SEBI Act provides SEBI with inter alia the power to proceed against Director(s) of companies who have illegally mobilized funds from the public through the issue of securities.

3.3 Upon a consideration of the aforementioned paragraphs, I am of the view that Shri Ajigul Haque, Shri Seikh Sarafat Ali, Shri Arup Bhattacharyya and Shri Sheik Saukat Ali, were also engaged in fund mobilising activity from the public, in their capacity as Directors of MADL, through the Offer of RPS and as a result of the aforesaid activity, have violated the aforementioned provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the SEBI Act.

4. In view of the alleged violations by the abovementioned past Directors, I, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under Sections 11, 11(4), 11A and 11B of the SEBI Act, hereby issue the following directions – i. The past Directors of MADL, viz. Shri Ajigul Haque (DIN: 03158904), Shri Seikh Sarafat Ali (PAN: AGWPA0991L; DIN: 03247659), Shri Arup Bhattacharyya (PAN: ASYPB9377P; DIN: 03159195) and Shri Sheik Saukat Ali (PAN: ACOPA1462G; DIN: 03158954), are prohibited from issuing prospectus or any offer document or issue advertisement for soliciting money from the public for the issue of securities, in any manner whatsoever, either directly or indirectly, till further orders; ii. The abovementioned past Directors of MADLare restrained from accessing the securities market and further prohibited from buying, selling or otherwise dealing in the securities market, either directly or indirectly, till further directions;

iii. The abovementioned past Directors of MADL shall provide a full inventory of all their assets and properties.

5.1 The abovementioned past Directors of MADLare advised to show cause as to why suitable directions/prohibitions under Sections 11(1), 11(4), 11A and 11B of the SEBI Act, Section 73(2) of the Companies Act read with Section 27(2) of the SEBI Act including the following, should not be taken/imposed against them:

i. Directing them jointly and severally to refund money collected through the Offer of Preference Shares alongwith interest, if any, promised to investors therein; ii. Directing them not to issue prospectus or any offer document or issue advertisement for soliciting money from the public for the issue of securities, in any manner whatsoever, either directly or indirectly, for an appropriate period; iii. Directing them to refrain from accessing the securities market and prohibiting them from buying, selling or otherwise dealing in securities for an appropriate period.

5.2 The abovementioned past Directors of MADL, may, within 21 days from the date of receipt of this Order, file their reply, if any, to this Order and may also indicate whether they desire to avail themselves an opportunity of personal hearing on a date and time to be fixed on a specific request made in that regard.

6. This Order is without prejudice to the right of SEBI to take any other action that may be initiated against the abovementioned past Directors of MADL in accordance with law.

7. This Order shall be read with the Final Order, copy of which is enclosed with this Order.

8. A copy of this Order shall be served on all recognized stock exchanges and depositories for necessary action.

Place: Mumbai S. RAMAN Date: July 7, 2016 WHOLE TIME MEMBER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free