Industrial Handling vs Electrosteel Steels Ltd And Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 515 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Appellate Tribunal has no power under sub-section (2) of Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 to condone a delay in filing an appeal beyond fifteen days, and an appeal filed after that period, with delay condoned only on an unsatisfactory showing, is liable to be dismissed as barred by limitation. Where a resolution plan has already been approved by the Appellate Tribunal in an earlier appeal arising from the same corporate insolvency process, a party is precluded from reopening the question of that plan's approval in subsequent proceedings before the Tribunal.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Industrial Handling ...Appellant
Vs.
Electrosteel Steels Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: - Mr. Sarathi Dasgupta, Ms. Srinanda Bose and Mr. Sujoy Chatterjee, Advocates.
For Respondents:- Mr. Bishwajit Dubey, Advocate for CoC. Mr. Aditya V. Singh, Advocate for Vedanta Ltd. Mr. Vaijayant Paliwal, Advocate for RP.
ORDER
05.09.2018─ This appeal has been preferred by the Appellant-
'Operational Creditor' against the order dated 17th April, 2018 after
delay of 85 days. However, in terms of sub-section (2) of Section 61 of
the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as this Appellate Tribunal
has no power to condone the delay beyond 15 days and no satisfactory
ground has been shown by the Appellant to condone the delay, we
dismiss the petition for condonation of delay. In the result, the appeal
is dismissed being barred by limitation.
I.A. No. 1330 of 2018 stands disposed of.
Contd/-...............
-2-
2. This apart, we may mention that the 'Resolution Plan' submitted
by 'Vedanta Ltd.' has already been approved by this Appellate Tribunal
by its judgment dated 10th August, 2018 in "Renaissance Steel India
Pvt. Ltd. v. Electrosteel Steels Ltd.─ Company Appeal (AT)
(Insolvency) No 175 of 2018".
3. For the said reason, now it is not open to any party to reopen the
issue before this Appellate Tribunal. The appeal is also devoid in merit.
It is accordingly dismissed. No cost.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
(Justice Bansi Lal Bhat) Member(Judicial) Ar/uk
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 515 of 2018
Connected matters
Decided by the same order
- Industrial Services (Gases) vs Electrosteel Steels Ltd And Ors5 September 2018
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free