Indus Valley Investment & Finance Pvt. ... vs Assessee
- CitationITA No.3763/Del/2013
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act cannot exceed the amount of exempt income earned by the assessee for the year; where the assessee has already voluntarily offered a disallowance, the further disallowance is confined so that the total does not exceed the exempt income, and any excess is to be deleted.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by
the CIT(A) on 10.4.2013 in relation to the assessment year 2009-10. ITA No.3763/Del/2013
2. The only issue raised before us is against the confirmation of
disallowance u/s 14A to the tune of Rs.1,05,07,322/-.
3. Succinctly, the assessee earned exempt income amounting to
Rs.25,38,020/- from investments in units of mutual funds. The assessee
suo motu offered disallowance u/s 14A for a sum of Rs.7,36,052/- being
½% of average of opening and closing balances of investment in shares
on which exempt dividend income was earned. The AO invoked the
provisions of section 14A read with Rule 8D and computed
disallowance at Rs.1.12 crore. As the assessee had offered disallowance
voluntarily at Rs.7.36 lac, he made further disallowance amounting to
Rs.1,05,07,322/-. The ld. CIT(A) upheld the addition.
4. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant
material on record. It is observed that the total exempt income earned
by the assessee is to the tune of Rs.25.38 lac, against which an addition
of Rs.1.05 crore has been made. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Joint
Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT, vide its judgment dated 25.2.2015, has
held that the disallowance u/s 14A cannot exceed the amount of exempt
2 ITA No.3763/Del/2013
income. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Holcim
India Pvt Ltd. (2014) 90 CCH 081-DEL-HC, has held that there can be
no disallowance u/s 14A in the absence of any exempt income. The
rationale behind these judgments is that the amount of disallowance u/s
14A should not exceed the exempt income. Since the total exempt
income in the instant case is Rs.25,38,020/-, we direct that the
disallowance u/s 14A be restricted to Rs.18,01,968/- (Rs.25,38,020-
Rs.7,36,052/-). The remaining amount of disallowance is directed to be
deleted.
5. In the result, the appeal is partly allowed.
The order pronounced in the open court on 29.04.2015.
Sd/- Sd/- [C.M. GARG] [R.S. SYAL] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated, 29th April, 2015. dk
3 ITA No.3763/Del/2013
Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT
AR, ITAT, NEW DELHI.
4
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free