Indian Overseas Bank vs Parekh Aluminex Ltd (Through Its Rp) & ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1156 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority, having been approached against an order of adjournment in a corporate insolvency resolution process where the statutory period is about to expire, is directed to decide promptly whether to accept or reject the resolution plan and to decide the resolution applicant's pending application for withdrawal of that plan, rather than deferring the matter; where a time-bound insolvency process is nearing its statutory limit, the Adjudicating Authority must determine the resolution plan and any pending withdrawal application expeditiously, and the appellate remedy is exercised by remitting the matter with such directions.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Indian Overseas Bank ...Appellant Versus Parekh Aluminex Ltd (Through its RP) & Anr. ...Respondents Present:
For Appellant: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Advocates
For Respondent: Mr. Irfan, Mr. Siddharth Ranade and Ms. Shivani, Advocates for R-2
ORDER
06.11.2019 - Learned counsel for the Appellant states that the Appellant
is a Lead Bank which was in the 'Committee of Creditors'. Counsel for parties
heard. It is stated that in the matter before the Adjudicating Authority
('National Company Law Tribunal') Mumbai Bench, the 'Resolution Plan' was
filed in August, 2018 for approval of the Adjudicating Authority. It is stated
that the Adjudicating Authority did not decide the question of approval of the
'Resolution Plan' and in the meanwhile, interalia because of delay taking
place affecting the valuation of the Company, the 'Resolution Applicant' filed
an application for withdrawal of 'Resolution Plan' and even that application is
still pending and the Adjudicating Authority has posted the matter to 7th
January, 2020. It is stated in such circumstances against the impugned
order of adjournment the present appeal has been preferred.
....contd.
2
It is stated by the Appellant that 90 days' period granted for completing
such matter under 3rd proviso of Section 12 would be soon expiring which
will put Company into Liquidation. It is stated that there is urgency that
the Adjudicating Authority decides the question of accepting 'Resolution Plan'
one way or other.
Considering what has been stated above by the parties we remit the
matter to Learned Adjudicating Authority to consider the above facts and
decide the question of accepting or rejecting the 'Resolution Plan' one way or
other and also to decide application filed by 'Resolution Applicant' for
withdrawal of 'Resolution Plan' urgently. Parties are directed to appear before
the Adjudicating Authority on 11th November, 2019 and the parties may
bring this order to the notice of Learned Adjudicating Authority and co-
operate with the Adjudicating Authority in disposal of the applications.
Registry to urgently issue copy of this order to the Advocates of the parties
who may collect the same from Registry by tomorrow.
The appeal is disposed of with directions as above.
[Justice A.I.S. Cheema] Member (Judicial)
[Kanthi Narahari] Member (Technical)
[V. P. Singh] Member (Technical) ss/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1156 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free