India Ratings And Research Private Ltd. vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No.103 of 2020
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Prima facie, SEBI has the power to initiate proceedings under Section 15-I(3) of the SEBI Act to enhance a penalty imposed by an Adjudicating Officer where SEBI forms the opinion that the order is not in the interest of the securities market.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
India Ratings and Research Private Ltd. ... Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India ...Respondent
Mr. Pesi Modi, Senior Advocate with Mr, Neville Lashkari, Mr. Sandeep Parekh, Ms. Deepika Goyal, Advocates i/b. Finsec Law Advisors and Mr. Anuj Berry, Advocate i/b. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas for the Appellant
Mr. Shyam Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mihir Mody and Mr. Shehaab Roshan, Advocate i/b. K. Ashar & Co. for the Respondent.
CORAM: Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Dr. C.K.G. Nair, Member Justice M.T. Joshi, Judicial Member
Per : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer
1.
An urgent application has been filed for hearing through
video conferencing.
2. Misc. Application no.159 of 2020 has been filed in
Appeal no.103 of 2020 praying that proceedings initiated by 2
Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred
to as 'SEBI') pursuant to the second show cause notice dated
28th January, 2020 issued under Section 15-I(3) of the
Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
(hereinafter referred to as 'SEBI Act') should be stayed.
3. In this regard we have heard Shri Pesi Modi, learned
Senior Counsel alongwith Shri Neville Lashkari, Shri
Sandeep Parekh, Ms. Deepika Goyal and Shri Anuj Berry,
Advocates for the Appellant and Shri Shyam Mehta, learned
Senior Counsel alongwith Shri Mihir Mody and Shri Shehaab
Roshan, learned counsel for the Respondent.
4. We find that by the impugned order dated 26 th
December, 2019 the Adjudicating Officer has imposed a
penalty of Rs.25 lakhs upon the Appellant for violating the
Code of Conduct to the Securities and Exchange Board of
India (Credit Rating Agencies) Regulations, 1999
(hereinafter referred to as 'CRA Regulations') while granting
credit rating to IL&FS for the financial year 2018-19. After
passing of the impugned order, SEBI issued a second show
cause notice dated 28th January, 2020 by exercising powers
under Section 15-I(3) of the SEBI Act directing the Appellant
to show cause as to why penalty should not be enhanced as in 3
their opinion the order of the Adjudicating Officer was not in
the interest of the securities market.
5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties at some
length, we are prima facie of the opinion that SEBI has the
power to initiate proceedings under Section 15-I(3) of the
SEBI Act. In the light of the aforesaid, we direct the
Respondent to file a reply within four weeks from today in
Appeal no.103 of 2020. Three weeks thereafter is allowed to
the Appellant to file rejoinder. The matter would be listed
for admission and for final disposal on 20 th August, 2020. In
the meanwhile, we direct the Appellant to deposit a sum of
Rs.25 lakhs pursuant to the impugned order dated
26th December, 2019 before the Respondent within four
weeks from today which would be subject to the result of the
appeal. We further direct that the proceedings in pursuance
to the second show cause notice dated 28th January, 2020 will
continue and the Respondent will pass appropriate orders
after giving an opportunity of hearing to the Appellant either
through physical hearing or through video conferencing but
any order that is passed by the Respondent shall not be given
effect to during the pendency of this appeal. Misc.
Application is accordingly disposed of. 4
6. Parties are directed to contact the Registrar 48 hours
before the date fixed to find out as to whether the hearing
would take place through video conferencing or through
physical hearing.
7. The present matter was heard through video conference
due to Covid-19 pandemic. At this stage it is not possible to
sign a copy of this order nor a certified copy of this order
could be issued by the registry. In these circumstances, this
order will be digitally signed by the Presiding Officer on
behalf of the bench and all concerned parties are directed to
act on the digitally signed copy of this order. Parties will act
on production of a digitally signed copy sent by fax and/or
email.
Digitally signed by TARUN
TARUN AGARWAL DN: c=IN, st=Uttar Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=a0e08b2d80e9d23c2c 2aa3e16780d684adad6bc9e81 0de2d7b0c28efd35557c9, Justice Tarun Agarwala AGAR postalCode=211001, street=B/ A,NYAYA MARG ALLAHABAD, serialNumber=095f8b286bb0b 1cd07ff676611f4f5e7999727d4 Presiding Officer WAL 04aa38ca422f9d3529bdb8a3, o=Personal, cn=TARUN AGARWAL Date: 2020.07.01 20:32:19 +05'30'
Dr. C. K. G. Nair Member
Justice M.T. Joshi Judicial Member
1.7.2020 RHN
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free