Miss Lucy
← All judgments

In the matter of VASP Engineer Private Limited

National Company Law Tribunal10 December 2025

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Tribunal may allow an application for withdrawal of a corporate insolvency resolution process under section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code where the Committee of Creditors has approved the withdrawal by a vote of 100 per cent of its voting share, the application is supported by the requisite Form FA, and the conditions of section 12A read with Regulation 30A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution for Corporate Persons) Regulations are satisfied; upon such withdrawal, the admission order is withdrawn and the corporate debtor is released from the moratorium.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNALMUMBAI BENCH COURT IIIItem No. 106IA (I.B.C)/4025 (MB)2025InC.P. (IB)/665(MB)2020CORAM: MS. LAKSHMI GURUNG, MEMBER (J)SH. HARIHARAN NEELAKANTA IYER, MEMBER (T)ORDER SHEET OF THE HEARING ON 10.12.2025HEARING THROUGH: (HYBRID) MODENAME OF THE PARTIES: MARINE ELECTRICALS INDIA LIMITEDVSVASP ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Appearance For RP : CS Anagha Anasingaraju i/b KANJ & Co LLP For Respondent : SECTION 9 OF THE IBC ORDER IA (I.B.C)/4025 (MB)2025 1. This application has been filed by the IRP under section 12A of the IBC seeking withdrawal of CIRP proceedings which commenced on 26.02.2025, in CP No. 665/2020 in view of the settlement entered between the Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor. 2. It is submitted that the CoC consists of sole member who is Operational Creditor, the original petitioner in the C.P. There are no financial creditors. In the second CoC meeting held on 21.08.2025 concluded on 22.08.2025, resolution was passed by CoC with 100% votes to file an application under section 12A of the IBC for withdrawal of the CIRP process. 3. Form FA dated 14.08.2025 duly signed by the original petitioner has been annexed to this application. 4. It is further submitted that an amount of Rs. 3 lakhs were deposited by the petitioner with the RP. After incurring CIRP cost of Rs. 2,50,000, the balance amount of Rs. 50,000 has been refunded to the petitioner on 23.08.2025. 5. There are no objectors before us. 6. After hearing the submissions made by the IRP and upon perusing the material available on record, this Bench feels that the above I.A. deserves to be allowed as all conditions of Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code read with Regulation 30A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution for Corporate Persons) Regulations have been satisfied. CoC with 100% votes have approved withdrawal of C.P. 7. Accordingly, the above I.A is allowed and the CIRP admission order dated 26.02.2025 passed by this Bench against the Corporate Debtor is withdrawn by releasing the Corporate Debtor from all rigours of moratorium. 8. With the above observations and directions, the I.A.(I.B.C)/4025 (MB)2025 as well as the main company petition C.P. (IB)/665(MB)2020 along with pending IAs if any stand disposed of.

Sd/- Sd/- HARIHARAN NEELAKANTA IYER LAKSHMI GURUNG Member (Technical) Member (Judicial) ---Rajeev---

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free