Miss Lucy
← All judgments

In the matter of Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited

National Company Law Tribunal12 September 2024

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where the Committee of Creditors has, by a resolution passed by not less than sixty-six per cent of the voting shares, approved the liquidation of the corporate debtor under Section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the 180-day period under Section 12 has expired without any application for extension or exclusion, the Adjudicating Authority is required to pass an order directing the liquidation of the corporate debtor; the time limit under Section 12 is strict, and absent a CoC resolution permitting an extension it is not to be relaxed. Where the Committee of Creditors has resolved to liquidate the corporate debtor and to continue the Resolution Professional as liquidator, and the Resolution Professional has filed Form H as required by Regulation 39(4) of the CIRP Regulations, the Adjudicating Authority may appoint the Resolution Professional as liquidator in accordance with the CoC's recommendation.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, SPECIAL BENCH – II, CHENNAI IA /IBC (LIQ)/ 9 (CHE) / 2024 IN CP (IB) / 166 (CHE) / 2022 (Under Section 33(2) & 34(5) of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 r/w Rules 11 & 32 of NCLT Rules, 2016) Mrs. Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi, Resolution Professional for M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited, IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P00919/2017-2018/11526, Flat No.503, Sri Aditya Land Mark, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, Telangana, India – 500 082. … Applicant In the matter of M/s. Sujana Universal Industries Limited … Operational Creditor Versus M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited … Corporate Debtor Order Pronounced on 12th September 2024 CORAM SHRI JYOTI KUMAR TRIPATHI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) SHRI VENKATARAMAN SUBRAMANIAM, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) For Applicant: Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi, Resolutional Professional ORDER (Heard through Hybrid model hearing) 1. IA/IBC (LIQ)/9 CHE) in CP (IB)/166 (CHE)/2022 is an application filed under section 33 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy code, 2016 (herein after termed as “the Code”) by Mrs. Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi, RP of M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited, the Corporate Debtor (hereinafter referred as “CD”) seeking following primary relief as follows, “Pass an order/s to liquidate the Corporate Debtor M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited u/s 33 of IBC, 2016 and appoint the Resolution Professional as the Liquidator of the CD”

IA/IBC (LIQ)/9(CHE)/2024 IN CP (IB)/166 (CHE)/2022 - Mrs. Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi, In the matter of M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited 1 OF 11

2. Heard the applicant and perused the documents on record. 3. M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited, the corporate debtor, was admitted to Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, (hereinafter referred as “CIRP”) vide an order dated 17.11.2023 passed by this Adjudicating Authority. Mrs. Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi, was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional of the CD. 4. Form the Compliance certificate (Form H) attached with the application the dates and events subsequent to initiation of CIRP of the CD is as follows,

S. No Date Events 1. 17.11.2023 Commencement of CIRP Public announcement in Financial Express – English and 2. 22.11.2023 Makkal Kural - Tamil 3. 13.12.2023 Constitution of Committee of Creditors (CoC) 1st CoC meeting where confirmation and continuance of 4. 20.12.2023 IRP as Resolution Professional (RP) of the CD is approved 5. 27.12.2023 Appointment of 1st Registered Valuer Deepika Kabra. 2nd CoC meeting approving issuance of Expression of 6. 16.01.2024 Interest in Form G. Publication of Form G in Financial Express and Makkal 7. 17.01.2024 Kural 3rd CoC meeting where the Constitution of CoC was 8. 18.03.2024 revised and Commercial Taxes department was included. 9. 06.04.2024 Appointment of 2nd Registered Valuer C.P. Sastry 05.05.2024 4th CoC meeting which resolved recommendation of 10. & Liquidation of the CD without going through 09.05.2024 Expression of Interest (EoI) process. 13.05.2024 11. & Conduction of Voting Process and declaration of results 14.05.2024 12. 14.05.2024 Expiry of 180 days of CIRP Date of filing Liquidation application before this 13. 15.05.2024 Adjudicating Authority 5. It is stated that IRP constituted the CoC based on the claims she received. Subsequently the IRP was confirmed as RP. In later stage, the Commercial Taxes

IA/IBC (LIQ)/9(CHE)/2024 IN CP (IB)/166 (CHE)/2022 - Mrs. Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi, In the matter of M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited 2 OF 11

Department submitted its claim and after verification RP admitted their claim and reconstituted the CoC. 6. The revised list of CoC as per the 3rd CoC meeting is extracted as follows,

7. It is averred that, during the 3rd CoC meeting, the CoC members informed the RP that as there are no transactions in the CD for the Past 3 to 4 years. 8. Further it is submitted that during the 4th CoC meeting, summary of Valuation reports of the Registered Valuers is submitted to the CoC that shows the average Fair Value of Rs.15,097.50/- and average Liquidation Value of Rs.15,097.50/-. The same is extracted as follows,

9. It is submitted that, during the 4th CoC meeting, the CoC opined that as the Liquidation value of the CD is only Rs.15,098.50/- and any extension of CIRP period would involve unnecessary costs and therefore opted for Liquidation Process of the CD and consented for putting Liquidation Resolution for e-Voting.

IA/IBC (LIQ)/9(CHE)/2024 IN CP (IB)/166 (CHE)/2022 - Mrs. Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi, In the matter of M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited 3 OF 11

10. Accordingly, the RP has put the liquidation resolution for voting of the CoC members after explaining the Regulation 39B, 39BA, 39C & 39D of CIRP Regulations. The Resolution for Liquidation of the CD is extracted as follows, "Resolved that pursuant to the provisions of Sec 33 (2), and Explanation provided thereunder of THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 Committee of Creditors Of M/s. Sudha Siva Private Limited hereby approve to Liquidate the Corporate Debtor and further resolved to continue the RP as Liquidator and further resolved that the RP shall file necessary application or IA with Hon'ble NCLT, Hyderabad to liquidate the Corporate Debtor." 11. The Resolution has been put for voting from 13.05.2024 to 14.05.2024 through Claim Bridge Technologies, where the above Resolution received favourable voting form one of the CoC member namely M/s. Sujana Universial Industries Limited who holds only 6.38% voting rights, whereas the other CoC member, the Commercial Taxes Department who has the 93.62% has not voted. The Voting is extracted as follows,

IA/IBC (LIQ)/9(CHE)/2024 IN CP (IB)/166 (CHE)/2022 - Mrs. Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi, In the matter of M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited 4 OF 11

12. It is submitted that the Commercial Taxes department did not participate in voting process because they wanted to discuss the matter with higher officials and only after that they can decide on this matter. 13. It is stated as per the Liquidation Resolution, CoC has recommended the applicant RP to be appointed as the Liquidator in respect of the CD and thus applicant has sought for appointing herself as the Liquidator as per the code. 14. The relevant Provisions under Section 12 and 33 of the IBC, 2016 is extracted for the ready reference as follows, “12. Time-limit for completion of insolvency resolution process. - (1) Subject to sub-section (2), the corporate insolvency resolution process shall be completed within a period of one hundred and eighty days from the date of admission of the application to initiate such process. (2) The resolution professional shall file an application to the Adjudicating Authority to extend the period of the corporate insolvency resolution process beyond one hundred and eighty days, if instructed to do so by a resolution passed at a meeting of the committee of creditors by a vote of 1[sixty-six] per cent of the voting shares. (3) On receipt of an application under sub-section (2), if the Adjudicating Authority is satisfied that the subject matter of the case is such that corporate insolvency resolution process cannot be completed within one hundred and eighty days, it may by order extend the duration of such process beyond one hundred and eighty days by such further period as it thinks fit, but not exceeding ninety days: Provided that any extension of the period of corporate insolvency resolution process under this section shall not be granted more than once: [Provided further that the corporate insolvency resolution process shall mandatorily be completed within a period of three hundred and thirty days from the insolvency commencement date, including any extension of the period of corporate

IA/IBC (LIQ)/9(CHE)/2024 IN CP (IB)/166 (CHE)/2022 - Mrs. Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi, In the matter of M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited 5 OF 11 insolvency resolution process granted under this section and the time taken in legal proceedings in relation to such resolution process of the corporate debtor: Provided also that where the insolvency resolution process of a corporate debtor is pending and has not been completed within the period referred to in the second proviso, such resolution process shall be completed within a period of ninety days from the date of commencement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2019.]

33. Initiation of liquidation. - (1) Where the Adjudicating Authority, - (a) before the expiry of the insolvency resolution process period or the maximum period permitted for completion of the corporate insolvency resolution process under section 12 or the fast track corporate insolvency resolution process under section 56, as the case may be, does not receive a resolution plan under sub-section (6) of section 30; or (b) rejects the resolution plan under section 31 for the non-compliance of the requirements specified therein, it shall – (i) pass an order requiring the corporate debtor to be liquidated in the manner as laid down in this Chapter; (ii) issue a public announcement stating that the corporate debtor is in liquidation; and (iii) require such order to be sent to the authority with which the corporate debtor is registered.”

15. The position of the law is clear and settled in respect of CIRP period and timelines in respect of CIRP. Section 12 mandates, the CIRP has to be completed within 180 days from the date of admission of the CIRP application. Further, unless there is a Resolution permitting the resolution professional to seek an extension beyond limit of 180 day period passed by the CoC with 66% voting of shares, the 180 day limit is sacrosanct. Section 33 of the Code provides when there is no resolution plan received or approved within the time period set out under Section 12, the adjudicatory authority shall pass an order of Liquidation of the CD.

IA/IBC (LIQ)/9(CHE)/2024 IN CP (IB)/166 (CHE)/2022 - Mrs. Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi, In the matter of M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited 6 OF 11

16. In “Manish Kumar V. Union of India, ([2021] 14 S.C.R. 895)” the Supreme Court of India observed as follows, “Section 33, which is in Chapter III in Part II, compels announcing the death knell of the corporate debtor. That is if, before the expiry of insolvency resolution process period or the maximum period permitted for CIRP which is Under Section 12, inter alia, a resolution plan is not received or though received is rejected by the adjudicating authority, then Under Section 33, order is to be passed. The curtains are wrung down on the insolvency resolution process. The corporate debtor goes into liquidation. The adjudicating authority is bound to pass an order requiring corporate debtor to be liquidated as provided in chapter III Part II. Section 33(2) contemplates that before the confirmation of the resolution plan if the committee of creditors so approved by not less than 66% of the he voting decide to liquidate the corporate debtor, the adjudicating authority is to pass the liquidation order.” 17. In the present case, we find that the time limit of 180 days expired on 14.05.2024 and there is no application seeking extension or exclusion of the time period relating to CIRP. Further from the submission, it is observed that CoC has no intention for extending CIRP so far. There is no realizable assets in the CD, where the Fair and Liquidation Valuation comes as Rs.15,097.50/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand ninety seven and fifty paisa). There is no Resolution Plan. No EoI was received during the CIRP and same is discussed in Minutes of 3rd CoC meeting dated 18.03.2024. 18. It is observed that since the CoC found no prospects in continuing with the CIRP. Therefore the above resolution for Liquidation of the Corporate Debtor has been passed taking into consideration the interest of the Corporate Debtor and all other stakeholders concerned. Thus CoC directed the Resolution professional to file application for Liquidation of the Corporate Debtor. 19. Insolvency Process being a time bound proceeding, the timelines are to be strictly adhered. Considering the status of the CD and acts of CoC the present application deserves to be considered.

IA/IBC (LIQ)/9(CHE)/2024 IN CP (IB)/166 (CHE)/2022 - Mrs. Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi, In the matter of M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited 7 OF 11

20. The Applicant/RP submitted FORM-H as per Regulation 39 (4) of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations 2016. The same is placed in the typed set of papers filed with the application. The extracts of Form H is as follows,

21. From the Minutes of the 4th CoC meeting and resolution passed thereon, it is observed that the CoC has proposed Liquidator in this matter and the connected portion of the Resolution is extracted as follows,

IA/IBC (LIQ)/9(CHE)/2024 IN CP (IB)/166 (CHE)/2022 - Mrs. Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi, In the matter of M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited 8 OF 11

22. Further it is observed by the Tribunal that the Liquidation resolution has been passed quoting that NCLT, Hyderabad has the required jurisdiction in the present matter, which seems to be typo. It is necessary to highlight that the location and registered office of the CD is well within the Jurisdiction limits of this Tribunal and we have the appropriate powers to decide this matter. 23. As the CoC has recommended the applicant RP to be continued as Liquidator for Liquidation Process, we allow the same. Further it is seen that the CoC has decided to discuss the fees of the Liquidator once the Liquidation order is passed. The relevant extracts are as follows,

24. From the above submissions, considering the position of law and intention of the CoC, this Adjudicating Authority deems it fit to order Liquidation of the Corporate Debtor. 25. Accordingly, we order liquidation of the Corporate Debtor by appointing Mrs. Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi having Reg. No. IBBI/ IPA-001/ IP-P00919/ 2017- 2018/ 11526 email id: emailtolak@gmail.com with valid AFA till 30.10.2024 as the IA/IBC (LIQ)/9(CHE)/2024 IN CP (IB)/166 (CHE)/2022 - Mrs. Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi, In the matter of M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited 9 OF 11

Liquidator to carry out the liquidation process subject to the following terms/directions: - a) The Liquidator shall strictly act in accordance with the provisions of IBC, 2016 and the attendant Rules and Regulations including Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2017 as amended up to date enjoined upon him. b) The Liquidator shall issue the public announcement that the Corporate Debtor is in liquidation. In relation to officers/ employees and workers of the Corporate Debtor, taking into consideration Section 33(7) of IBC, 2016, this order shall be deemed to be a notice of discharge. c) The Liquidator shall investigate the financial affairs of the Corporate Debtor particularly, in relation to preferential transactions/ undervalued transactions and such other like transactions including fraudulent preferences and file a suitable application before this Adjudicating Authority. d) The Registry is directed to communicate this order to the Registrar of Companies, Chennai and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India; e) In terms of section 178 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Liquidator shall give necessary intimation to the Income Tax Department.

In relation to other fiscal and regulatory authorities which govern the Corporate Debtor, the Liquidator shall also duly intimate about the order of liquidation. f) The order of Moratorium passed under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 shall cease to have its effect and a fresh Moratorium under Section 33(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code shall commence. g) The Liquidator is directed to proceed with the process of liquidation in a manner laid down in Chapter III of Part II of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. h) The Liquidator is directed to investigate the financial affairs of the Corporate Debtor in terms of the provisions of Section – 35(1) of IBC, 2016 read with relevant rules and regulations and also file its response for disposal of any pending Company Applications during the process of liquidation. i) The Liquidator shall submit individual Preliminary report to this Tribunal within 75 (seventy-five) days from the liquidation commencement date as per Regulation 13 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016. Further such other or further reports as are required to be filed under the IA/IBC (LIQ)/9(CHE)/2024 IN CP (IB)/166 (CHE)/2022 - Mrs. Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi, In the matter of M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited 10 OF 11 relevant Regulations, in addition, shall also be duly filed by him with this Adjudicating Authority.

Copy of this order be sent to the financial creditors, Corporate Debtor and the Liquidator for taking necessary steps and for extending the necessary cooperation in relation to the Liquidation process of the Corporate Debtor. 26. With the above directions, IA/ IBC (LIQ)/ 9(CHE)/ 2024 in CP (IB)/ 166(CHE)/ 2022 stands allowed and disposed of.

-Sd/- -Sd/- VENKATARAMAN SUBRAMAIAM JYOTI KUMAR TRIPATHI MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

Order Pronounced under Rule 151 of NCLT Rules 2016, by Hon’ble Judicial Member, Shri Jyoti Kumar Tripathi on behalf of the Special Bench II Comprising of Shri Jyoti Kumar Tripathi, Member (Judicial) and Shri Venkataraman Subramaniam, Member (Technical).

-Sd/- Court Officer

Ganesh Prabhu

IA/IBC (LIQ)/9(CHE)/2024 IN CP (IB)/166 (CHE)/2022 - Mrs. Mummaneni Yazra Laxmi, In the matter of M/s. Sudha Siva Traders Private Limited 11 OF 11

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free