Miss Lucy
← All judgments

In the matter of Suasth Health Care Foundation

National Company Law Tribunal26 April 2024

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Tribunal does not decide any contested point of law; it disposes of the application on the Resolution Professional's assurance. The reasoning it does state is as follows. Once a resolution plan has been approved under Section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the claims provided for in the plan stand frozen and bind the corporate debtor and its creditors, and claims not part of the resolution plan stand extinguished, so that no person may initiate or continue proceedings in respect of such a claim. Amounts payable to a creditor for services rendered to the corporate debtor after the commencement of the corporate insolvency resolution process are to be treated as insolvency resolution process costs under Section 5(13) of the Code, and are to be paid in accordance with the provisions of the Code and the regulations made thereunder, in priority to other payments under the resolution plan.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNALKOLKATA BENCH (Court-II)KOLKATAIA(I.B.C)/289(KB)2023InC.P. (IB)/204(KB)2021

An application under Section 60 (5) of the Insolvency and bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Rule 11 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 In the matter of: Suasth Health Care Foundation, an existing Company within the meaning of the Companies Act, 2013, having its registered office at Plot No. X-1, 2 & 3, Block-EP, Sector-V, Salt Lake City, Kolkata – 700091, West Bengal. … … … Corporate Debtor And In the matter of : M/s. BCL Secure Premises Pvt. Ltd. … … … Applicant Versus Suasth Health Care Foundation … … … Respondent

Date of pronouncement: 26th April, 2024

CORAM: SMT. BIDISHA BANERJEE, HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL) SHRI ARVIND DEVANATHAN, HON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Appearance (via video conferencing/physically) Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv. ] For the Applicant in Ms. Sweta Dubey, Adv. ] IA (I.B.C)/324(KB)2024 Ms. Kanishka Prasad, Adv. ] Ms. Ishita Srivastava, Adv. ] Ms. Ichchha Kalash, Adv. ]

KOLKATA BENCH (Court-II) KOLKATA IA(I.B.C)/289(KB)2023 In C.P. (IB)/204(KB)2021

Mr. Rajat Jain, Adv. ] For the Applicant in ] IA(I.B.C)/1639(KB)2023 Mr. Sumit Biswal, Adv. ] For the Applicant in Mr. Shreyan Das, Adv. ] IA(I.B.C)/289(KB)2023 Mr. Rishav Banerjee, Adv. ] For the Respondent No.1 in Ms. Shreya Choudhary, Adv. ] IA(I.B.C)/1025(KB)2022 Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Adv. ] For the Respondent Nos. 6, 8 and 9 in Mr. Rajarshi Banerjee, Adv. ] IA(I.B.C)/1025(KB)2022 Mr. Shaunak Mitra, Adv. ] For the Respondent Nos.3, 4, 5, 7, 10 ] and 11 in IA(I.B.C)/1025(KB)2022 Ms. Manju Bhuteria, Adv. ] For the COC in IA(I.B.C)/1308(KB)2022 Mr. Pramit Chakraborty, Adv. ] Mr. Arindam Mrinal Pal, Adv. ] Mr. Adwitya Das, Adv. ] Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv. ] For the Resolution Professional and Mr. Deep Roy, Adv. ] Implementation and Monitoring Ms. Namrata Saraogi, Adv. ] Committee in IA(I.B.C)/324(KB)2024 Mr. Kartik Pandey, Adv. ] Mr. Rahul Auddy, Adv. ] Mr. Dhaval Savla, Adv. ] Mr. Aditya Gooptu, Adv. ] Mr. Deep Roy, Adv. ] For the Erstwhile Resolution Mr. Dhaval Savla, Adv. ] Professional in IA(I.B.C)/1911(KB)2023, Mr. Aditya Gooptu, Adv. ] IA(I.B.C)/1308(KB)2022, ] IA(I.B.C)/1639(KB)2023, ] IA(I.B.C)/1025(KB)2022 and ] IA(I.B.C)/289(KB)2023 Mr. Patita Paban Bishwal, Adv. ] For Shristi Infrastructure Development ] Corpn. Ltd. in IA(I.B.C)/1025(KB)2022

KOLKATA BENCH (Court-II) KOLKATA IA(I.B.C)/289(KB)2023 In C.P. (IB)/204(KB)2021

O R D E R

Per: Bidisha Banerjee, Member (Judicial) 1. The Court convened in a hybrid mode. 2. Heard both the learned Counsel for the parties. 3. The application has been preferred by the Applicant praying for the following reliefs: (a) Pass an order directing the Resolution Professional for clearing the dues of Rs.88,18,503.68/- of the Applicant along with 18% of interest till the realization of the said amount; (b) Pass any further order as this Hon’ble Tribunal deems fit in this regard; 4. Facts in a nutshell : (a) The Tribunal vide its order dated 31st August, 2021 initiated the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in respect of the Corporate Debtor. Mr. Ravi Sethia was appointed as Resolution Professional. (b) The Applicant claims to have rendered security services and housekeeping services in accordance with the terms of the relevant agreements during the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor and raised the relevant invoices for the services rendered by it. The Resolution Professional made payments for several invoices raised by the Applicant during the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor. (c) The CIRP of the Corporate Debtor is at a stage wherein a resolution plan has been approved by this Adjudicating Authority vide IA(I.B.C)/1381(KB)2022 under Section 30 (6) read with Section 31 of the Code.

KOLKATA BENCH (Court-II) KOLKATA IA(I.B.C)/289(KB)2023 In C.P. (IB)/204(KB)2021 (d) The present application was filed by the Applicant seeking an order directing the Resolution Professional to clear the dues of Rs.88,18,503.68/- for the services rendered by the Applicant for the period prior to the initiation of CIRP of the Corporate Debtor and post the initiation of CIRP of the Corporate Debtor. 5. Submission of Resolution Professional : In response to the contentions raised by the Applicant, the Resolution Professional has made the following submissions: (a) Dues of the Applicant prior to initiation of CIRP (i) In pursuance to the initiation of CIRP in respect of the Corporate Debtor and the issuance of Form A by the Insolvency Resolution Professional, the Applicant has filed its claim for a sum of Rs.60,69,586/- (Rupees Sixty lakh sixty-nine thousand five hundred and eighty-six only), under Form B as an Operational Creditor on September 7, 2021. (ii) That the allegation by the Applicant that the said claim has not been admitted by the Resolution Professional is completely false and misconceived. Rather, the claim of the Applicant has been duly verified and, admitted by the Resolution Professional to the tune of Rs.60,58,378/- (Rupees Sixty lakh fifty-eight thousand three hundred and seventy-eight only). The said admission is reflected in the list of creditors of the Corporate Debtor uploaded in the website of the Corporate Debtor. This was duly

KOLKATA BENCH (Court-II) KOLKATA IA(I.B.C)/289(KB)2023 In C.P. (IB)/204(KB)2021 informed to the Applicant by the Resolution Professional, vide his e-mail dated March 17, 2022. (A copy of the said e-mail dated March 17, 2022 is marked as Annexure-B). (iii) It is trite law that all claims filed by the creditors of the Corporate Debtor shall be paid in accordance with the terms of the resolution plan approved by the CoC and, thereafter, by this Tribunal. In support the direction of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Ghanashyam Mishra and Sons (P) Ltd. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. (2021) SCC OnLine SC 313 has been cited. Hon’ble Apex Court therein has clearly held that – “Once a resolution plan is duly approved by the adjudication authority under sub-section (1) of Section 31, the claims as provided in the resolution plan shall stand frozen and will be binding on the corporate debtor and its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, guarantors and other stakeholders. On the date of approval of resolution plan by the adjudicating authority, all such claims, which are not a part of resolution plan shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue

KOLKATA BENCH (Court-II) KOLKATA IA(I.B.C)/289(KB)2023 In C.P. (IB)/204(KB)2021 any proceedings in respect to a claim which is not part of the resolution plan.” (iv) Accordingly, it is submitted that in the light of the admitted claim of the Applicant for a period prior to the CIRP amounting to Rs.60,58,378/- (Rupees Sixty lakh fifty-eight thousand three hundred and seventy-eight only), the payment shall be made in accordance with the terms and stipulated under the resolution plan and the provisions of the Code. (b) Dues of the Applicant post initiation of CIRP (i) It is an undisputed fact that the Applicant continued to render the security services and housekeeping services under the relevant contracts even after the commencement of CIRP of the Corporate Debtor and raised the relevant invoices for the service rendered by it. A per the books and records of the Corporate Debtor, the amount payable to the Applicant under the said invoices for the services rendered after the commencement CIRP is Rs.23,70,727/- (Rupees Twenty-three lakh seventy thousand seven hundred and twenty-seven only). (ii) Reference is made to Section 5 (13) that defines Insolvency Resolution Costs to mean: (a) the amount of any interim finance and the costs incurred in raising such finance; (b) the fees payable to any person acting as a resolution professional;

KOLKATA BENCH (Court-II) KOLKATA IA(I.B.C)/289(KB)2023 In C.P. (IB)/204(KB)2021 (c) any costs incurred by the resolution professional in running the business of the corporate debtor as a going concern; (d) any costs incurred at the expense of the Government to facilitate the insolvency resolution process; and (e) any other costs as may be specified by the Board. (iii) Accordingly, it is clarified that the amounts payable to the Applicant under the invoices raised in relation to the services rendered by the Applicant after the initiation of CIRP of the Corporate Debtor shall be treated as Insolvency Resolution Process Costs (“CIRP Costs”) and shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of the Code and that the Resolution Professional has made payments for several invoices raised by the Applicant during the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor. (iv) It is submitted that pursuant to the initiation of CIRP, the Corporate Debtor has been struggling with several operational issues and no substantial revenue is currently being generated. In spite of the poor financial condition of the Corporate Debtor, the Resolution Professional has undertaken all possible efforts to ensure payment of the amounts due under the relevant invoices raised by the Applicant after the initiation of CIRP of the Corporate Debtor. This is evident from the e-mails dated February 18, 2022

KOLKATA BENCH (Court-II) KOLKATA IA(I.B.C)/289(KB)2023 In C.P. (IB)/204(KB)2021 and September 6, 2022 sent by the Corporate Debtor to the Applicant annexed as Annexure-C and Annexure-D respectively. (v) It is assured by the Resolution Professional that the entire sum of Rs.23,70,727/- (Rupees Twenty-three lakhs seventy thousand seven hundred and twenty-three only), payable to the Applicant for the services rendered after initiation of CIRP of the Corporate Debtor shall be treated as CIRP cost and after approval of the resolution plan, such dues shall be paid in full and in priority over other payments being made under the resolution plan as per the provisions of the Code and the applicable regulations framed thereunder. 6. In view of the above, we dispose of IA(I.B.C)/289(KB)2023 with directions to act in terms of the assurance as noted above and in accordance with law. 7. Urgent Certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties, upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

D. Arvind Bidisha Banerjee Member (Technical) Member (Judicial)

This Order signed on this, the 26th day of April, 2024.

Sayon (Steno)

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free