In the matter of Soni E Vehicle Pvt. Ltd.
- CitationIA-6530-2023 in IB-245(ND)-2021
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal, in giving effect to the Supreme Court's order, holds that where proceedings under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code have been disposed of in terms of a settlement recorded by the Supreme Court, with liberty to revive upon default, the Tribunal is bound to close the proceedings and restore the corporate debtor to its original position, without proceeding further under the Code, while the question of insolvency resolution process costs is left open for notice and reply.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IA-6530/2023:- Mr. Chaurasia, Ld. Counsel appearing for Resolution Professional has submitted that, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in Civil Appeal No. 5157/2023 passed on 01.12.2023 in the case of Anuj Sharma vs. Rustagi Projects Private Limited and Anothers the following order:- “Parties will be bound by the terms and conditions mentioned in the Deed of Compromise/settlement dated 04.10.2023. In case there is any default in payment in terms of the compromise/settlement, the proceedings in C.P. no. (IB)-245(ND)/2021 shall get revived and will continue from the present stage. In case full payment in terms of the compromise/settlement is made, C.P. no. (IB)-245(ND)/2021 will be treated as disposed of, without
Mamta 15.12.2023 any further orders or taking recourse to the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.” Mr. Chaurasia has placed on record a copy of the order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as well as a copy of the Settlement Agreement. In view of the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the present proceedings under IB-245(ND)/2021 stands closed. The Corporate Debtor is restored back to its original position. With respect to the prayer relating to CIRP cost, let notice be issued to Operational Creditor as well as Corporate Debtor. The Resolution Professional shall take steps to serve notice on the Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor and file and affidavit of service within three days. Reply, if any, shall be filed within one week thereafter.
List on 04.01.2024.
Sd/- Sd/- (ATUL CHATURVEDI) (BACHU VENKAT BALARAM DAS) MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Mamta 15.12.2023
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free