In the matter of Solaratria Clean Tech Private Limited
- CitationC.P. (IB) No.144/BB/2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority, having been directed by the appellate tribunal to admit a Section 9 application unless the corporate debtor settled the operational creditor's dues before admission, must admit the application where no settlement has been proposed or made, and the Authority is then bound to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, appoint an interim resolution professional, and impose the moratorium. Where a qualified resolution professional has filed a written communication declaring her registration, absence of other engagements, willingness to accept the assignment, and agreed fee, and the application is otherwise complete and in accordance with law, the Adjudicating Authority is satisfied that the petition is a fit case for admission and may appoint that professional as interim resolution professional. The moratorium under the Code operates from the date of the admission order and continues until completion of the corporate insolvency resolution process, prohibiting the institution or continuation of suits and proceedings against the corporate debtor, transfer or encumbrance of its assets, enforcement of security interests, recovery of property occupied by the corporate debtor, and termination or suspension of supply of essential goods or services.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL BENGALURU BENCH COURT NO.1 ATTENDANCE CUM ORDER SHEET OF THE HEARING OF NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU BENCH, BENGALURU, HELD ON 17.02.2020 PRIORITY CAUSE LIST 1 –
PRESENT: 1. Hon'ble Member (J), Shri Rajeswara Rao Vittanala 2. Hon'ble Member (T), Shri Ashutosh Chandra CP/CA No. Purpose Sec Name of Petitioner Name of Respondent Petitioner Advocate Respondent Advocate CP( IB)No. Remanded Sec 9 of M/s Aailborg Pragathi M/s Solar Atria Shri Sidhartha 144/BB/2018 | back from 1&B Code CSP A/s Law Cleantech Pvt Das, Shri NCLAT Chambers Ltd Gowrishankar Mishra
ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER/s: ADV. Simranteah MS. SIMRAN JEET Kuhi AYUSSHI AGARWAL ahnat
ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT/s: Mr. ADAMYA VIKRANT ARORAN MA. MEHUL
ORDER Heard Ms. Simran Jeet along with Ms. Ayusshi Agarwal, learned Counsels for the Petitioner and Mr. Adamya Vikrant along with Ms. Mehul Arora, learned Counsels for the Respondent. C.P (IB) No. 144/BB/2018 is disposed of by separate order. Quí MEMBER (T) MEMBER (J) Brunda
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL BENGALURU BENCH
C.P. (IB) No.144/BB/2018 U/s 9 of IBC, 2016 R/w Rule 6 of I&B (AAA) Rules, 2016
In the matter of M/s. Aalborg CSP A/S K 16, LGF Jangpura Ext., New Delhi 110 014 – Represented by its CFO and authorised signatory, Mr. Henrik M. Pape Petitioner/Operational Creditor -
Versus M/s. Solar Atria Cleantech Private Limited No.1, Palace Road, Bengaluru 560 001 Respondents/ Corporate Debtor – -
Date of Order: 17th February, 2020 Coram: 1. Honble Shri Rajeswara Rao Vittanala, Member (Judicial) 2. Hon'ble Shri Ashutosh Chandra, Member (Technical) Parties/Counsels Present: For the Petitioner Ms. Simran Jeet with Ms. Ayusshi Agarwal For the Respondent Mr. Adamya Vikrant with Ms. Mehul Arora
ORDER Per: Rajeswara Rao Vittanala, Member (J) 1. C.P (IB) No.144/BB/2018 is filed by M/s. Aalborg CSP A/S (hereinafter referred to as 'Petitioner/Operational Creditor) U/s 9 of the IBC, 2016, R/w Rule 6 of the I&B .(Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016, by inter alia seeking to initiate Corporate
NCLT, Bengaluru Bench C.P (IB) No.144/BB/2018
Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) in respect of M/s. Solar Atria Cleantech Private Limited, on the ground, that it has committed default for total amount of $ 421,900.43 (Four Hundred and Twenty One Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars ).Another CP (IB) No. 143/BB/2018 was also filed by the same Petitioner by seeking to initiate CIRP against same Corporate Debtor. 2. Both the said Company Petitions came to be dismissed by the Adjudicating Authority by separate orders even dated 11th January, 2019. Aggrieved by the orders, the Petitioner has preferred two Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) Nos. 167 & 168 of 2019 before Hon'ble NCLAT. After considering the matter, the Hon'ble NCLAT was pleased to dispose bothy the Appeals by common order dated 22nd January, 2020 with the following directions: A) Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.167 of 2019 is dismissed. Impugned Order in CP (IB) No. 143/BB/2018 is maintained. B) Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.168 of 2019 is allowed. Impugned Order dated 11th January, 2019 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench) in CP (IB) No. 144/BB/2018 is quashed and set aside. Parties are directed to appear before the Adjudicating Authority on 17th February, 2020. The Adjudicating Authority will admit the said Section 9 Application and pass further Orders required to be passed for initiating CIRP process unless before order of admission is passed, Corporate Debtor settles the dues of the Operational Creditor in CP (IB) No.144/BB/20198. Till the Adjudicating Authority passes Order for admission, the Corporate Debtor will maintain status quo with regard to its assets and will not transfer, encumber, alienate or dispose of its assets or create any legal right or beneficial interest in its properties. Both the Appeal are disposed accordingly. No Orders as to costs.
NCLT, Bengaluru Bench C.P (IB) No.144/BB/2018
3. After receipt of the said order, the instant case is listed for admission on 28.01.2020. Since none appeared for both the Parties, the Adjudicating Authorities issued notices to the Parties, and thus posted to 17.02.2020 to give an opportunity to the Parties to appear and report settlement of the claim if any, as per the directions of the Hon'ble NCLAT. However the Respondent has not come with any proposal of settlement.
4. Heard Ms. Simran Jeet, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, and Mr. Adamya Vikrant, learned Counsel for the Respondent. We have perused the records of the case and also the order of the Honble NCLAT passed by the said appeal. 5. Ms. Simaran Jeet, learned Counsel for the Petitioner has submitted since the impugned order of dismissal was set aside and the Respondent has not come with any proposal of settlement, the Adjudicating Authority has to admit the case by initiating CIRP, as per the order of the Hon'ble NCLAT.
6. The instant Application is filed in accordance with law and qualified Resolution Professional namely Ms. Sumana Rao, having Registration Number: IBBI/IPA-002/IP-N00059/2016-2017/10111 is suggested as IRP, who has filed her written communication dated 28.06.2018 by inter alia declaring that she is a qualified Resolution Professional with Registration Number: IBBI/IPA-002/IP- NO0059/2016-2017/10111, she has not serving in any proceedings, she is willing to accept the assignment after the Adjudicating Authority appoints her, she has also filed letter date 28.06.2019, addressed to the Operational Creditor by agreeing the total fee payable for the engagement would be INR 1,75,000/- plus GST subject to the break up given there in and other expenses. Therefore, we are convinced that the instant Petition is a fit case to admit by initiating CIRP, appointing IRP, imposing moratorium etc.
NCLT, Bengaluru Bench C.P (IB) No.144/BB/2018
7. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, by exercising powers conferred on this Adjudicating Authority, under provisions of Section 9 and other extant provisions of the IBC, 2016, we hereby admitted C.P.(IB)No.144/BB/2018 by initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) in respect M/s. Solar Atria Cleantech Private Limited the Respondent/Corporate Debtor, with the following consequential directions: 1) Ms. Sumana Rao, bearing Registration Number: IBВІ/ІРА-| 002/IP-N00059/2016-2017/10111, who is qualified Resolution Professional, is hereby appointed as Interim Resolution Professional, in respect of the Respondent/ Corporate Debtor namely M/s. M/s. Solar Atria Cleantech Private Limited to carry out the CIRP as mentioned under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and various rules issued by IBBI from time to time; 2) The following moratorium is declared prohibiting all of the following, namely: a) the institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the Respondent/Corporate Debtor including execution of any judgment, decree or order in any court of law, Tribunal, Arbitration panel or other authority; b) transferring, encumbering, alienating or disposing of by the Corporate Debtor any of its assets or any legal right or beneficial interest therein; c) any action to foreclose, recover or enforce any security interest created by the corporate debtor in respect of its property including any action under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002;
NCLT, Bengaluru Bench C.P (IB) No.144/BB/2018 d) The recovery of any property by an owner or lessor where such property is occupied by or in the possession of the Corporate Debtor; e) The supply of essential goods or services to the Corporate Debtor as may be specified shall not be terminated or suspended or interrupted during moratorium period; The provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply to such transactions as may be notified by the Central Government in consultation with any financial sector regulator; g) The order of moratorium shall have effect from the date of such order till the completion of the corporate insolvency resolution process; 3) The IRP is directed to follow all extant provisions of the IBС, 2016, and all extant rules including fees rules as framed by IBBI from time to time. The IRP is hereby directed to file Adjudicating progress reports to the Authority from time to time. 4) The Board of Directors and all the staff of Respondent/ Corporate Debtor are hereby directed to extend full co-operation to the IRP, in carrying out his functions as such, under the Code and Rules made by IBBI. 5) Post the case for report of IRP on 20.03.2020. Liste (ASHUTOSH CHANDRA) (RAJESWARA RAO VITTANALA) MEMBER, TECHNICAL MEMBER, JUDICIAL Brunda
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free