Miss Lucy
← All judgments

In the matter of S.V.K. Shipping Services Private Limited

National Company Law Tribunal6 September 2024

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Committee of Creditors' commercial decision to reject a resolution plan and recommend liquidation of the corporate debtor, taken by a 100% voting share after the expiry of the CIRP period, is non-justiciable and the Adjudicating Authority cannot sit in appeal over it; where the CoC has so resolved, the Tribunal is to allow the application under Section 33(1)(b) and order liquidation, appointing the liquidator recommended by the CoC.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

SI.No.3 NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL AMARAVATI BENCH (Virtual Hearing) PRESENT: SHRI RAJEEV BHARDWAJ MEMBER (JUDICIAL) :SHRI SANJAY PURI MEM–BER (TECHNICAL ATTENDANCE-CUM-ORDER SHEET – OF THE HEARING HELD ON 06.09.2024 AT 01:00 P.M. TC/CP. Nos. САЛАA No. Present stage Section/Rule Name of Parties of the case Liquidation Tricon Energy (India) Pvt Ltd Vs SVK Admitted Appl f i i c le a d tion 9 of IBC Shipping Services Pvt Ltd CP(IB)/202/9/AMR /2019 IA(IBC)(LIQ Mr.Kalvakolanu Muralikrishna Prasad, RP of UIDATION)/ For Orders U/s 33(1)(b) of IBC,. M/s Tricon Energy (India) Pvt Ltd vs. SVк 2/2024 Shipping Services Pvt Ltd ORDER IA(IBC)(LIQUIDATION)/2/2024: Present: Ms. JVL Bharati, Ld. Counsel for the Liquidator

Orders Pronounced. IA(IBC)(LIQUIDATION)/2/2024 is allowed and recorded vide separate sheets. 3d1- Sdi SANJAY PURI RAJEEV BHARDWAJ MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL AMARAVATI BENCH AT MANGALAGIRI IA(IBC) (LIQ.)/2/2024 in CР(ІВ)/202/9/AMR/2019 [Application under Section 33 (1) (b) of the Insolvency and Bankruptey Code, 2016] In the matter of M/S SVK SHIPPING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED Mr. Kalvakolanu Muralikrishna Prasad, Resolution Professional of M/s. SVK Shipping Services Private Limited, H.No: 8-27, Plot No: 106, Road No: 10, Mythripuram Colony, Vyshalinagar, Hyderabad 500079. ...Applicant/Resolution Professional - Date of Order: 06.09.2024 CORAM:

SHRI RAJEEV BHARDWAJ, HON'BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL) SHRI SANJAY PURI, HON'BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL)

Parties/Counsels Appearance: For Applicant/RP Mrs. J.V.L. Bharati, Advocate along with Mr. Kalvakolanu Muralikrishna Prasad, RP.

ORDER (Per: Benchh) 1 This is an Application filed by Mr. Kalvakolanu Murali Krishna Prasad, Resolution Professional (“RP”) of M/s. SVK Shipping Services Private Limited (Corporate Debtor (“CD”)), under section 33 (1) (b) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, seeking:

3d1-

NCLT, Amaravati Bench LA (IBC) (LIO)/2/2024 In CP (IB)/202/9/AMR/2019 a) To initiate Liquidation Process of the Corporate Debtor under section 33 of the Code and b) To Appoint Mr. Kalvakolanu Murali Krishna Prasad, RP as the Liquidator of the Corporate Debtor as recommended by Committee of Creditors (“COC”).

2. Brief facts of the Application are as follows: a) This Tribunal vide order dated 1305.2022 admitted the Corporate Debtor into CIRP and appointed Mr. Kantipudi Venkatraju as Interim Resolution Professional (“IRP") and in the 1st COC meeting held on 09.06.2022, COC replaced the IRP and vide order dated 24.08.2022 passed by this Tribunal, Mr. Kalvakolanu Murali Krishna Prasad was appointed as the RP. b) During the 4th COC meeting held on 25.10.2022, decided to extend the CIRP period by 90 days from 10.11.2022, as the CIRP period expired on 09.11.2022, and the Tribunal allowed the same in its order dated 17.11.2022 passed in IA/325/2022. The Tribunal granted a second extension of 60 days, ending the CIRP 330-day period on 08.04.2023. A final extension of 45 days and a 116-day exclusion were granted on 20.04.2023, which expired on 17.09.2023. c) The RP received a Resolution plan from Shri. ABP Narasimham, the sole resolution applicant (“SRA”), submitted to the СОС on 11.09.2023. The committee reviewed the proposal, which offered a total payment of Rs. 201.10 lakhs, including CIRP expenses and amounts offered to various creditors, which was revised by an additional Rs. 5.00 lakhs on 18.04.2023, which are as under:

Sd Sdh

NCLT, Amaravati Bench IA (IBC) (LIQ)/2/2024 In CP (IB)/202/9/AMR/2019 Category of Claimed Admitted Final % of creditor/stakeholder Amount Rs. Amount Rs. settlement settlement Amount Rs. Amount to admitted claim CIRP Costs 26,00,000 26,00,000 26.00,000 100% Secured financial 3,98,88,783 3,96,17,544 43,20,000 10.90% creditors Canara - Bank, China Waltair Branch Secured Financial 2,53,43,387 1,23,23,077 50,00,000 40.57% creditors Hinduja — Leyland Finance Ltd. Unsecured Ο Ο 이 Ο Financial Creditors: Govt. dues ST 10,74,82,770 9,50,12,322 54.35,827 5.72% Other OCs – 5,88,24,602 5,17,24,611 20,64,173 3.99% Ο Total 23,28,39,542 19,99,77,548 1,94,20,000 Contingent 11,90,000 liabilities Grand total 2,06,10,000 d) In the said meeting the representative of the COC observed that: i) The payments offered to operational creditors are disproportionate to their eligibility under the waterfall mechanism, as per sec 53. ii) The distribution of Plan payments offered to secured creditors is not uniform and as such amount offered to Canara Bank is not satisfactory. iii) COC members desired to know he alternative available to the financial creditors in case the resolution plan is not accepted. e) The RP informed the COC that the alternative left over is liquidation, with financial creditors having the option to exercise their rights over the assets of the CD under their charge or relinquish them to the liquidator for forming a liquidation estate and disposing of the assets resolution according to section 53 of the IB code, 2016. The Sd Sd rage-3-of 6

NCLT, Amaravati Bench LA (IBC) (LIQ)/2/2024 In CP (IB)/202/9/AMR/2019 professional received confirmation from Canara Bank on 22.07.2024, and e-voting was arranged from 25.07.2024 to 26.07.2024. Both COC members voted in favour of liquidation with 100% voting share and passed the resolution which are as under: To review the present status of CIRP vis-à-vis Balance CIRP perioр as allowed by Hon'ble NCLT available and decide the further course of action: i. Resolution for liquidation of CD: “Committee resolved to reject the resolutionplan submitted by Sri. APB Narasimham for a total amount of Rs. 206.10 lakhs and further resolved to recommend to the adjudicating authority, Hon 'ble NCLT Amaravati Bench, for liquidation of the corporate debtor, under sec 33 (1) of IBC, 2016. The committee also resolved to direct the RP to file necessary IA with the Hon'ble Adjudicating Authority, accordingly." f Further, the CoC by majority vote, had approved resolutions under a regulation 39B, 39C and 39D. The CoC suggested the name of the Applicant RP to appoint as the Liquidator. 3. Hence, the present Interlocutory Application has been filed for seeking Liquidation of the Corporate Debtor.

4. We have heard the Learned Resolution Professional and perused the records. 5. It appears from the above that the CoC did not receive a feasible proposal for the revival of the Company, even after taking all the necessary actions during the CIRP mandated by the Code. as 6. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of K. Sashidhar Versus Indian Overseas Bank & Ors in Civil Appeal No. 10673 of 2018 has held that the commercial decision of CoC is non-justiciable. In this case, it is seen that NCLT. Amaravati Bench IA (IBC) (LIQ)/2/2024 In CP (IB)/202/9/AMR/2019 CoC with 100% majority has passed the resolution seeking liquidation of the Corporate Debtor. 7. Hence, this Adjudicating Authority deems it proper to allow this Application. Accordingly, in exercise of powers conferred under Sub- Clause (i), (ii) and (iii) of Clause (b) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 33 of the IBC 2016, we proceed to pass the Order as follows: ORDER a This Adjudicating Authority hereby order for Liquidation of M/S. SVK SHIPPING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, which shal1 be conducted in the manner as laid down in Chapter III of Part II of the IBC, 2016. b) This Adjudicating Authority hereby appoint Mr. Kalvakolanu Muralikrishna Prasad (Registration No: IBBI/IPA- P00967/2017-18/11588) as Liquidator as resolved by CoC. c) The Liquidator shall issue public announcement stating that Corporate Debtor is in Liquidation. d) The Moratorium declared under Section 14 of the IBC, 2016 shall cease to operate here from. e) Subject to section 52 of the IBC 2016 no suit or other legal proceedings shall be instituted by or against the Corporate Debtor.

This shall however not apply to legal proceedings in relation to such transactions as may be notified by the Central Government in consultation with any financial sector regulator. f) Ali powers of the Board of Directors, Key Managerial Personnel and partners of the Corporate Debtor shall cease to have effect and shall be vested in the Liquidator. Sdlr Sdir

NCLT, Amaravati Bench IA (IBC) (LIQ)/2/2024 In CP (IB)/202/9/AMR/2019 g) The Liquidator shall exercise the powers and perform duties as envisaged under Sections 35 to 50 and 52 to 54 of the Code, read with Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations 2016. h) Personnel connected with the Corporate Debtor shall extend all assistance and cooperation to the Liquidator as will be required for managing its affairs. i) The Liquidator shall be entitled to such fees as may be specified by the Board in terms of Section 34 (8) of the Code. j) This Order shall be deemed to be a notice of discharge to the officers, employees and workmen of the Corporate Debtor, except when the business of the Corporate Debtor is continued Liquidationn process by the Liquidator. k) Copy of the Order shall be furnished to the IBBI, to the Regional Director (South Eastern Region), Ministry of Corporate Affairs; Registrar of Companies & Official Liquidator, Andhra Pradesh, the Liquidator. Registered Office of the Corporate Debtor; and the 8. With the above directions IA(IBC)(LIQ)/2/2024 in CP(IB)/202/9/AMR/ 2019 is allowed and disposed of. S- SANJAY PURI RAJEEV BHARDWAJ MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

Chandu

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free