In the matter of S.B. Ispat (india) Private Limited

CO RRI G EN DUM OR DER 1. This matter was not on Board today. However, upon mentioning, thematter was taken uponBoard. 2. In the Pronouncement of Order dated 05.07.2024 in IA(IBC)(DIS.)/13(KB)2024 under C.P. (IB)/1270(KB)2019, some necessary changes are required to be made in the manner specified as under: a) Para No. 5 at Page 6 of this Order will be replaced by the paragraph as mentioned hereinbelow: “5. During 5th SCC meeting held on 13.09.2023, it was discussed and decided amongst the SCC members that in terms of Regulation 44A of the Liquidations Regulations, after the dissolution and closure of the Liquidation, the HDFC Bank Limited in its sole rights will pursue the proceeding in respect of avoidance transactions and shall kept theproceeds, if any from the Avoidance matter. It was further clarified that all the cost/expenses w.r.t pursing the avoidance matter before the dissolution or closure of liquidation shall form part of the liquidation cost and shall be borne by the contributories and after the dissolution or closure of liquidation,thesameshallbeborneby theHDFC BankLimited.” 3. Restof theOrder will remain unchanged.

D. Arvind BidishaBanerjee Member (Technical) Member (Judicial)

PH[PS]

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH, (Court – II) KOLKATA

IA(IBC)(DIS.)/13(KB)2024 C.P. (IB)/1270(KB)2019

An application under Section 54(2) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and Read with Regulation 45(3) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016.

In the matter of:

(1) S.B. ISPAT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED. ... Corporate Debtor (In Liquidation) -And- (2) MR. NITIN DAGA, LIQUIDATOR OF S.B. ISPAT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, an Insolvency Professional, having its office at 68-A, Metropolitan Co-Operative Housing Society, 2nd Floor, Kolkata – 700 105. ... Applicant/Liquidator

Date of pronouncing of the order: 05/07/2024

Coram: SMT. BIDISHA BANERJEE HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL) SHRI D. ARVIND HON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL)

Appearances (via video conferencing/physically): Mr. Shaunak Mitra, Adv. : For the Liquidator Mr. Saurav Jain, Adv. :

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH (Court –II) KOLKATA

Per: D. Arvind, Member (Technical) 1. The court convened through hybrid mode.

2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the liquidator was heard in extenso.

3. This application IA(IBC)(DIS.)/13(KB)2024 has been preferred to seek the following reliefs, inter alia: - (a) That this Court be pleased to pass an Order to dissolve the Corporate Debtor under Section 54(2) of IBC, 2016; and (b) This this Court be pleased to direct the Registrar of Companies to update the status of the Corporate Debtor as dissolved; and (c) This this Court be pleased to take note of the Final Report of the Liquidation Process as annexed in the ‘Annexure – 21’; or (d) Any other directions which the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the matter;

4. Factual matrix of the case is as under: - (a) The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was initiated against S.B. ISPAT (INDIA) Private Limited herein the Corporate Debtor by our Order dated 07.01.2022.

(b) During the process of CIRP, as no Resolution Plan was received, and consequently, the applicant filed application under Section 33(1)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH (Court –II) KOLKATA

Code, 2016. The liquidation Order was passed on 18.11.2022.

(c) In accordance with Regulation 41(1) of the Liquidation Regulations, the Applicant has opened a new current bank account bearing account no. 270505500112 with ICICI Bank, Metropolitan Branch in the name of the Corporate Debtor followed by words “under liquidation” in a Scheduled Bank, for the receipt of all moneys due to the Corporate Debtor which was activated for undertaking Financial Transactions from 01.12.2023.

(d) The applicant meanwhile had filed an application under Sections 43, 45 & 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 being application numbered IA(I.B.C)/484(KB)2022 before this Adjudicating Authority which deals with PUFE/Avoidance transactions for a sum of Rs. 9,39,21,113.00/-.

(e) Subsequently, the liquidation estate comprising of the assets of the Corporate Debtor was formed and the applicant duly constituted the Stakeholders Consultation Committee (in short “SCC”) as per the provision of the Regulations 31A of the Liquidation Regulations, 2016 on 17.01.2023.

(f) The liquidation value was insignificant, and consequently, the applicant did not get any bid to sell the company as a going-concern, and consequently, the private sale was recommended by the SCC Members.

(g) Upon receiving quotation from scrap buyers, the quotation of M/s. Trendy Bazar was accepted, and accordingly, SCC Members gave approval for making sale of assets of the IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH (Court –II) KOLKATA

Corporate Debtor to sell the assets of the Corporate Debtor to M/s. Trendy Bazar through Private Sale, under regulation 33(2) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (in short “IBBI”) (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016.

(h) Upon receipt of Order approving through private sale by this Adjudicating Authority on 17.07.2023, the assets of the Corporate Debtor were sold with the said M/s. Trendy Bazar.

(i) In capacity of RP/liquidator, the liquidator sent various emails, letters including legal notices from its legal counsel for recovery of dues from the debtors of the Corporate Debtor. The applicant apprised the SCC Members that none of the debtors of the Corporate Debtor being body corporate having outstanding debts in excess of more than Rs. 1 Crore, no proceeding can be initiated under IBC and, therefore, need to explore proceedings before the appropriate Courts/Forums for recovery.

(j) However, since the SCC Members was in view not to initiate any legal proceedings since it only incur cost and time and they do not apprehend any recoveries from the said debtors. All these debts and recoverable debts were classified as not realizable of the assets and publication was made to receive Expression of Interest (in short “EOI”), but no EOI was received.

(k) The SCC Members denied for distribution of such assets not realizable and the assets were mostly not recoverable and valued NIL by the valuers. Accordingly, a decision was taken by the SCC Members to seek dissolution of the Corporate Debtor in terms of (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016.

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH (Court –II) KOLKATA (l) It is evident from the ‘Form H’ that assets as per Asset Memorandum and Final Sale Report are as under: -

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH (Court –II) KOLKATA

5. We would infer that approval of the Resolution Plan shall not affect the proceedings of the PUFE applications and the Resolution Professional shall continue to pursue those applications sans any barrier. We would refer to the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Tata Steel BSL vs. Venus Recruiters reported at 2023/DHC/000257 wherein it it held that: “89. Conclusion: XXX XXX XXX d) It follows that the RP will not be functus officio with respect to adjudication of avoidance applications in a situation, as described hereinabove. There being a clear demarcation between the scope and nature of the CIRP and avoidance application within the scheme of the IBC, the RP can continue to pursue such

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH (Court –II) KOLKATA applications. The method and manner of the RP’s remuneration ought to be decided by the Adjudicating Authority itself.” (Emphasis Added)

6. Hence, the rival contentions were noted.

7. At this juncture, we would go through the various provisions of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code dealing with the dissolution of the Corporate Debtor which are as follows: -

Section 54 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code Dissolution of Corporate Debtor – (1) Where the assets of the corporate debtor have been completely liquidated, the liquidator shall make an application to the Adjudicating Authority for the dissolution of such corporate debtor.

(2) The Adjudicating Authority shall on application filed by the liquidator under sub-section (1) order that the corporate debtor shall be dissolved from the date of that order and the corporate debtor shall be dissolved accordingly.

(3) A copy of an order under sub-section (2) shall within seven days from the date of such order, be forwarded to the authority with which the corporate debtor is registered.”

Rule 45 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016: Final report prior to dissolution.

(1) When the corporate debtor is liquidated, the liquidator shall make an account of the liquidation, showing how it has

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH (Court –II) KOLKATA been conducted and how the corporate debtor’s assets have been liquidated.

(2) If the liquidation cost exceeds the estimated liquidation cost provided in the Preliminary Report, the liquidator shall explain the reasons for the same.

(3) The liquidator shall submit an application along with the final report and the compliance certificate in form H to the Adjudicating Authority for – (a) closure of the liquidation process of the corporate debtor where the corporate debtor is sold as a going concern; or (b) or the dissolution of the corporate debtor, in cases not covered under clause (a).

8. We would note that the Applicant in compliance to the Code and its Regulations has discharged his duties diligently and has made several efforts for the maximum realization from the assets of the corporate debtor. The liquidation Process is fully complete. Thus, the Liquidator in compliance has filed the present application under Section 54 read with Regulation 45 of IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulation, 2016, seeking an Order of dissolution of the corporate debtor.

9. In compliance of regulation 15 of the Liquidation Process Regulations, the Liquidator has filed six quarterly Progress Reports from time to time before this Adjudicating Authority and also the final report disclosing all the material facts and information with respect to the liquidation process of the Corporate Debtor. As per mandatory requirement under regulation 45(3) of the Liquidation Process Regulations, the Liquidator has prepared a compliance certificate under prescribed ‘Form H’. Both

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH (Court –II) KOLKATA the final report and compliance certificate under form H is annexed with the application and marked as annexure Annexure – ‘O’.

10. A conjoint reading of these the statutory provisions as noted supra, mandates upon completion of the liquidation of the assets of the corporate debtor, filling of subsequent application to the Adjudicating Authority to seek dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC where the assets of the Corporate Debtor either have been completely liquidated after distribution among the Stakeholders or for early dissolution under Regulation 14 of the Liquidation Process Regulations, or where the realizable properties of the corporate debtor are insufficient to cover the cost of the liquidation process, the liquidator may apply to the Adjudicating Authority for early dissolution.

11. In view of the above facts and circumstances, this Adjudicating Authority in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (2) of section 54 of the Code hereby Orders dissolution of the Corporate Debtor, S.B. ISPAT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED from the date of this Order, thus stands dissolved and consequently, the Liquidator stands relieved from his responsibilities, subject to procedural compliances.

12. The Liquidator and the Registry are hereby directed to serve a copy of this Order upon the Registrar of Companies, West Bengal, within fourteen days of receipt of this Order. The Registrar of Companies shall take further necessary action upon receipt of a copy of this Order.

13. Further, the Liquidator is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) within fourteen days of receipt of this order. The IBBI shall take further necessary action upon receipt of a copy of this Order.

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH (Court –II) KOLKATA

14. All the assets of Corporate Debtor have been disposed of and distributed in accordance with the code and rules and regulations framed thereunder and the final report has been submitted.

15. IA(IBC)(DIS.)/13(KB)2024 along with C.P. (IB)/1270(KB)2019 is allowed with the above directions and the IA(IBC)(DIS.)/13(KB)2024 and C.P. (IB)/1270(KB)2019 are hereby disposed of accordingly.

16. The Registry is directed to send e-mail copies of the order forthwith to all the parties and their Ld. Counsel for information and for taking necessary steps.

17. Urgent certified copy of this Order may be issued, if applied for, with the Registry, upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

18. File be consigned to records.

D. Arvind Bidisha Banerjee Member (Technical) Member (Judicial)

Order signed on: 05th of July, 2024. Ar. [steno]