Miss Lucy
← All judgments

In the matter of Radius Sumer Developers Private Limited

National Company Law Tribunal8 April 2025

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Tribunal may allow withdrawal of a corporate insolvency resolution process application under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, where the withdrawal is supported by Form FA and the applicant and the operational creditor have confirmed that the dues have been received, so that no claim survives and no committee of creditors has been constituted.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH COURT VI Item No. 3 IA(I.B.C)/1640(MB)2025 IN RCP(IB)/3(MB)2025 CORAM: SHRI SAMEER KAKAR SHRI NILESH SHARMA HON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL) HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL) ORDER SHEET OF HEARING (HYBRID) DATED 08.04.2025 NAME OF THE PARTIES: Capacite Infraprojects Ltd. Vs Radius Sumer Developers Pvt Ltd In the matter of Capacite Infraprojects Limited Vs Radius Sumer Developers Private Limited For Applicant/RP: (in IA/1640/2025) - Adv. Mr. Rohit Gupta a/w Adv. Ms. Bhookika Lodhe For Respondent: Adv. Ms. Shivani Deshmukh i/b Mulla Associates Sections 9, 12(A)/Regulation 30A of IBC ORDER 1. Ld. Counsel Mr. Rohit Gupta for the Applicant is present in physical mode, Ld. Counsel Ms. Shivani Deshmukh for the Respondent is present through VC. 2. This is an application filed under Section 12-A of IBC, 2016 seeking the following prayers: (a) The Hon’ble Court be pleased to allow the withdrawal of the present RCP (IB) No. 03/MB/2025 under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, read with Regulation 30A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016; (b) Any other order that this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of this case; (c) Costs of the present Application; 3. It is stated that the Corporate Debtor was admitted to CIRP while order dated 18.03.2025.

It is further stated that the IRP has received Form- FA from the Operational Creditor. Form-FA is appended on page no. 18 & 19 and is dated 26.03.2025. 4. It was stated by the Counsel for the IRP that COC has not been formed till now. Learned Counsel for the IRP pleaded that this application may be allowed as they have received the entire dues and nothing is receivable by them from the Corporate Debtor/Operational Creditor towards costs and expenses. 5. Ld. Counsel Ms. Shivani Deshmukh for the Operational Creditor states that the entire consideration by way of allotment of flats has since been received by them and no cause survives for them too. 6. Considering that Form-FA has been filed along with this present application, the IRP has received the entire dues and the Operational Creditor has also received the dues, we deem it fit to allow the present application. Prayer-A is hereby allowed. The Corporate Debtor is released from the rigors of law and is allowed to function through its own board.

7. IRP is discharged from the said assignment accordingly, this application is disposed of.

Sd/- Sd/- SAMEER KAKAR NILESH SHARMA MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL) //Arshad//

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free