In the matter of Radission Resources Private Limited

An application under section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Regulation (38) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016

In the matter of Janpragati Commodities Private Limited … Financial Creditor Versus Radission Resources Private Limited …Corporate Debtor And In the matter of Pratap Mukherjee … Liquidator/ Applicant Coram: Smt. Bidisha Banerjee : Member (Judicial) Shri Balraj Joshi : Member (Technical) Appearances (via hybrid mode): Ms. Vedika Sureka, Adv. ] For the Applicant/ Liquidator Order pronounced on: 24.07.2024 ORDER Per: Coram 1. This Court convened through hybrid mode.

KOLKATA BENCH (Court– I) IA (IB) 1149/KB/2024 in C.P. (IB) 1147/KB/2020 2. This is an application preferred by Mr. Pratap Mukherjee i.e Liquidator of the Corporate Debtor, under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC” or “Code”) read with Regulation (38) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 (“Liquidation Regulations”), inter alia, seeking the following reliefs; i. Pass necessary order to allow distribution of unsold assets of the corporate debtors by the liquidator to the stakeholders; ii. Any other directions which this Adjudicating Authority may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the matter.

Brief facts of the case 3. The underlying Company Petition in C.P. (IB) No. 1147/KB/2020 was filed by Janpragati Commodities Private Limited, the Financial Creditor against the Corporate Debtor, to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”), under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, which was admitted vide order dated 27.01.2022. 4. Mr. Neeraj Jain was appointed as the IRP vide the said order. Thereafter, the IRP was replaced by the Applicant herein as Resolution Professional vide order dated 25.05.2022. Subsequently, the Adjudicating Authority allowed the application filed for initiation of liquidation process of the Corporate Debtor vide order dated 23.03.2023. Submissions of the Applicant in I.A. (IB) No. 1149/KB/2024 5. Public announcements as per Regulation 12 of the Liquidation Regulations was made by the Applicant in Form B which was pblished in two newspapers namely “Morning India" (English Daily) and "Sanmarg" (Hindi daily), both having circulation in Jharkhand. The only claim received was from the Financial Creditor herein for an amount of Rs. 49,61,753/-.

KOLKATA BENCH (Court– I) IA (IB) 1149/KB/2024 in C.P. (IB) 1147/KB/2020 6. The Applicant/Liquidator initiated the e-auction process and the public notice1 for e-auction was published in two newspapers of Ranchi edition namely “Morning India" (English Daily) and "Sanmarg" (Hindi daily) on 28th June, 2023. The first e-auction conducted by the liquidator failed. The notice of the E-auction was also published on the website of IBBI. 7. Thereafter, in the 3rd meeting of the Stakeholders Consultation Committee (“SCC”) held on 14.07.2023 the SCC permitted the Applicant to conduct 2nd e-auction for the intangible assets i.e., book debts. The sale notice of 2nd e-auction was published2 in two newspapers viz. “Morning India" (English Daily) and "Sanrnarg" (Hindi daily), both Ranchi Edition, on 22d July, 2023. However, since no bid application was received, the 2d e-auction also failed. The Applicant again published3 sale notice for 3rd e-auction on 25.08.2023 in “Sanmarg” and “Morning India”. The third e-auction also failed since no bid was received. The e-auction notices of both 2nd and 3'd e-auctions were also published on the website of IBBI. 8. The Applicant, for the recovery of the book debts, also sent various letters and e-mails to the debtors. One of the debtors i.e Naman Ispat Private limited was admitted into CIRP and later liquidated as on 23.11.2023. The claim of the Corporate Debtor was admitted4 to the extent of Rs. 22,50,000/- by the liquidator of Naman Ispat Private limited. No response was received from other debtors either during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Period or during liquidation process period. 9. The Applicant has also filed an application under Section 65 and section 66 of the Code being IA(IBC) No. 3/KB 12024 against the Corporate Debtor, Financial Creditors and other Sundry Debtors of the Corporate Debtor with the allegations

1 Annexure C 2 Annexure D 3 Annexure E 4 Annexure G & H

KOLKATA BENCH (Court– I) IA (IB) 1149/KB/2024 in C.P. (IB) 1147/KB/2020 that the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was initiated maliciously and for purposes other than resolution of the Corporate Debtor. The Adjudicating Authority has issued notices to the Respondents therein. 10. The registered office of the Corporate Debtor is presently occupied by somebody else. The Applicant has issued various letters, e-mails to the erstwhile directors of the Corporate Debtor for sharing of relevant documents, invoices, challans, lorry receipts etc for sale/assignment of the book debts to the intending purchasers/assignees. The Applicant in the capacity of the Resolution Professional also filed an application under section 19(2) of the Code being IA(IBC) No. l066/2022 against the erstwhile directors of the Corporate Debtor. However, the directors escaped by advising that they do not have the documents under their possession. 11. The Financial Creditor has not paid CIRP cost and the liquidation cost to the Applicant and on various occasions has expressed its inability to pay any amount towards the same. The Applicant had filed an application for direction upon the Financial Creditor to make payment of the CIRP and liquidation costs. However, even after the direction on behalf of the Adjudicating Authority to consider payments of the costs, the Financial Creditor has failed to make such payments. 12. In the 6th SCC Meeting5 held on 26.04.2024, the Applicant informed the SCC that in the present circumstances, two options were available with the SCC viz. (i) identifying the assets as not readily realizable assets under Regulation 37A and (ii) distribution of the unsold assets among the stakeholders under Regulation 38 of the Liquidation Process Regulations. After deliberations, the SCC recommended the filing of appropriate application before the Adjudicating Authority for distribution of unsold assets to the stakeholders. Analysis and Findings: 13. Heard the Ld. Counsel on behalf of the Applicant and perused the record.

5 Annexure J

KOLKATA BENCH (Court– I) IA (IB) 1149/KB/2024 in C.P. (IB) 1147/KB/2020 14. In the instant matter the intangible assets being the book debts remain unsold and hence the Applicant is seeking to distribute the same amongst the stakeholders. It is submitted that the Applicant has issued notice for e-auction of the said book debts thrice but all three attempts failed due to lack of bids. The Applicant has also attempted to contact6 the sundry debtors but has not been able to recover any of the amounts payable by the said debtors. It is thus clear that since the efforts of the Applicant in realizing the intangible assets have borne no fruit, the options remaining with the SCC are to either identify the asset as not readily realizable assets under Regulation 37A of the Liquidation Process Regulations or to distribute the aforesaid unsold assets among the stakeholders under Regulation 38 of the Liquidation Process Regulations. The Applicant, with the consent of the SCC in the 6th SCC Meeting, has decided to take the latter route. 15. In this regard it is necessary to refer to Regulation 38 of the Liquidation Regulations which is reproduced hereinafter: “38. Distribution of unsold assets.- (1) The liquidator may, with the permission of the Adjudicating Authority, distribute amongst the stakeholders, an asset that could not be sold, assigned or transferred due to its peculiar nature or other special circumstances. (2) The application seeking permission of the Adjudicating Authority under sub-regulation (1) shall- (a) identify the asset; (b) provide a value of the asset; (c) detail the efforts made to sell the asset, if any; and (d) provide reasons for such distribution.”

6 Annexure H- Pages 51-63

KOLKATA BENCH (Court– I) IA (IB) 1149/KB/2024 in C.P. (IB) 1147/KB/2020 16. It is seen that in compliance of Reg. 38 (2), the Applicant has identified the unsold assets to be the book debts of the Corporate Debtor. Further, the value7 of said asset has been submitted as follows: S. No. Name of Sundry Debtors Amount due as on 27.01.2022 (Rs.) (1) Ancient Suppliers Private Limited 11,80,680.80 (2) Pragish Textiles Private Limited 6,06,17,348 (3) Naman Ispat Private Limited 22,50,000 (4) Urvee Investments Private Limited 17,00,000 Total 6,57,48,028.80

17. Further, as mentioned above, the efforts made by the Liquidator in realizing the said asset has been mentioned in details by the Applicant and is provided hereinafter: Attempt Details Notice Publication Date Attempt Failure Reason 1st E- Auction 28.06.2023 E-Auction failed 2nd E-Auction 22.07.2023 No bid received 3rd E-Auction 25.08.2023 No bid received Letters and Emails Between 12.05.2023 to Claim of Corporate issued to various 13.09.2023 Debtor herein admitted sundry debtors by liquidator of Naman Ispat Private limited. No other reply received

18. Since the intangible asset i.e book debts had not been sold during the liquidation period, and since the Financial Creditor had expressed its inability to pay CIRP and Liquidation costs to the Applicant, the SCC, in the 6th SCC Meeting held on 26.04.2024, decided on advise of the Applicant to distribute the said assets under

7 Page 17 of Application

KOLKATA BENCH (Court– I) IA (IB) 1149/KB/2024 in C.P. (IB) 1147/KB/2020 Regulation 38 of the Liquidation Regulations. A resolution to that effect was passed8 by 100% votes in the 6th SCC Meeting. 19. In light of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we see no reason to continue further with the liquation process and incur more liquidation cost in due course. As such, we deem it fit to allow the instant application and hold so. 20. IA (IB) No.1149/KB/2024 is hereby disposed of accordingly. 21. The Registry is directed to email copies of the order forthwith to the learned Counsel on record and the Liquidator for information. 22. Certified copies of this order may be issued, if applied for, upon compliance of all requisite formalities. 23. List C.P.(IB) 1147/KB/2020 on 06.09.2024 for further consideration. 24. File be consigned to the record.

Balraj Joshi Bidisha Banerjee Member (Technical) Member (Judicial)

Order dated the 24th day of July 2024

SM(LRA)

8 Annexure J, Page 79