In the matter of Purvi Metals Pvt. Ltd.
- CitationI.A No.1 of 2022 In CP (IB) No.4505-MB-2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal's reasoning rests on the following propositions, in the order the order takes them: Where the Committee of Creditors, having considered that the corporate debtor is not a going concern, that no Expression of Interest or resolution plan has been received, and that no assets are available for realisation, resolves by a 100% vote to direct the Resolution Professional to seek liquidation, the Adjudicating Authority will defer to that commercial wisdom of the CoC and allow an application under Section 33 of the Code for the liquidation of the corporate debtor. Upon such an allowance, the Adjudicating Authority will appoint a liquidator under Section 34(1) of the Code, whereupon the powers of the board of directors, key managerial personnel and partners of the corporate debtor cease to have effect and vest in the liquidator, and the moratorium-type restriction on institution of suits or other legal proceedings by or against the corporate debtor operates subject to Section 52 of the Code.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
5. After collation of the aforementioned claims received against the Corporate Debtor and determination of the financial position of the Corporate Debtor, the IRP constituted the Committee of Creditors (CoC) of the Corporate Debtor consisting Union Bank of India with 84.66 % and Reliance- AR with 15.34% and the formation of CoC was intimated by IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-V I.A No.1 of 2022 In CP (IB) No.4505/MB/2019
IRP to this Hon’ble Tribunal, Mumbai on 16.03.2020.After formation of CoC, nationwide lockdown was imposed, due to which the further work could not be proceed.
6. In the second CoC Meeting on 21.09.2020, the CoC members did not grant approval for the issuance of Expression of Interest, the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional to act as Resolution Professional, the appointment of Registered Valuers, and the appointment of a Forensic Auditor. Furthermore, due to the non-approval, the deemed Interim Resolution Professional was not able to issue the Expression of Interest for the Resolution of the Corporate Debtor.
7. In the meantime, the two lockdowns were declared, which restrained the deemed Interim Resolution Professional from carrying out important tasks except holding CoC meetings.
8. As a consequence of the lockdown, an Interlocutory Application bearing filing No. 27091138/06357/2021 (IA No. 2973 of 2021) was filed before the Hon'ble Tribunal for the exclusion of 243 days with effect from 01.04.2020 till 30.11.2021 in the first wave of COVID-19 and the exclusion of 152 days from 01.04.2021 till 31.08.2021 in the second COVID-19 wave, totaling a period of 395 days under Regulation 40(C) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process of Corporate Person) Regulation, 2016 on 16.12.2021, and the said Interlocutory Application was allowed by the Hon'ble Tribunal via order
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-V I.A No.1 of 2022 In CP (IB) No.4505/MB/2019 dated 05.01.2024.
9. In the Sixth CoC meeting held on 17.06.2021, the CoC members opined that the Corporate Debtor was not a going concern in any process; therefore, the Corporate Debtor should be directly referred for liquidation.
10. In the 8th CoC meeting, the CoC members concluded that, in view of no Expression of Interest being proposed by CoC members, the applicant/IRP was approved to initiate and move an application before the Hon’ble Tribunal for Liquidation as there were no valuable assets in the Company.
11. During the 9th CoC meeting held on 20.10.2021, the CoC members determined that since there were no sufficient assets to be recovered, it would not be prudent to pursue the Expression Of Interest (EoI). The liquidation of the corporate debtor was approved by 100% voting
12. After hearing the submissions made by the Counsel appearing for the Applicant and upon perusing the material available on record, the Counsel for the Applicant submits that no Expression of Interest (EOI) and Resolution Plan has been received and since the Corporate debtor is not operational and does not have assets that can be realised as observed from the Minutes of the 9th CoC Meeting, there is no option except to put the Corporate Debtor Company into Liquidation as per the Code. In view of the fact that there are no assets available of the corporate debtor, the CoC considered it appropriate to direct the applicant to move an appropriate application for IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-V I.A No.1 of 2022 In CP (IB) No.4505/MB/2019 seeking permission of liquidation of the corporate debtor. After having appreciated the contention of the applicant, we deem it appropriate to agree with the commercial wisdom of the CoC to allow present application for liquidation.
13. Accordingly, the above Interlocutory Application Number 1 of 2023 is stands disposed of. The Prayers are allowed, directing the Liquidation of the Corporate Debtor. Accordingly, we pass the following order.
ORDER
14. The above I.A. No. 1 of 2022 is allowed in terms of the above said and is disposed of.
15. The Corporate Debtor M/s Purvi Metals Private Limited is ordered to be liquidated.
16. Ms. Bharati Manoj Daga, having IP Registration Number IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P-01963/2020-2021/13070,is hereby appointed as the Liquidator as provided under Section 34(1) of the Code.
17. That the Liquidator for conduct of the liquidation proceedings would be entitled for fees as per table mentioned in Regulation 4(3) of the IBBI (Liquidation Process Regulations), 2016.
18. The Liquidator appointed in this case to initiate
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-V I.A No.1 of 2022 In CP (IB) No.4505/MB/2019 liquidation process as envisaged under Chapter-III of the Code by following the liquidation process given in the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016.
19. The Liquidator is appointed under section 34(1) of the Code. All powers of the board of directors, key managerial personnel and thepartners of the Corporate Debtor, as the case may be, shall cease to have effect and shall be vested with the liquidator.
20. That the Corporate Debtor to be liquidated in the manner as laid down in the Chapter by issuing Public Notice stating that the Corporate Debtor is in liquidation with a direction to the Liquidator to send this order to the ROC under which this Company has been registered.
21. That the personnel of the Corporate Debtor are directed to extend all co-operation to the Liquidator as required by him in managing the liquidation process of the Corporate Debtor.
22. That on having liquidation process initiated, subject to Section 52 of the Code, no suit or other legal proceeding shall be instituted byor against the Corporate Debtor save and except the liberty to the liquidator to institute suit or other legal proceeding on behalf of the Corporate Debtor with prior approval of this Adjudicating Authority.
23. This liquidation order shall be deemed to be a notice
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-V I.A No.1 of 2022 In CP (IB) No.4505/MB/2019 of discharge to the officers, employees and workmen of the Corporate Debtor except to the extent of the business of the Corporate Debtor continued during the liquidation process by the Liquidator.
SD/- SD/- Madhu Sinha Reeta Kohli Member (Technical) Member (Judicial) /Priyanka/
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free