In the matter of Orkus Pvt. Ltd.
- CitationIB – 453-ND-2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority admitted an operational creditor's application under Section 9 of the Code where the corporate debtor, by its own reply affidavit, admitted that the operational debt was due and that it was unable to pay it. On that admission of the debt and of default, the application satisfied the criteria of Section 9, and the Authority was therefore satisfied that the application was complete and admissible. A general unsupported assertion by the corporate debtor of quality disputes over the goods supplied, unaccompanied by any evidence, does not constitute a plausible dispute of the operational debt sufficient to bar admission of a Section 9 application.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Order under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Rule 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016.
IN THE MATTER OF: M/S JPM INDUSTRIES LIMITED Having Its Registered address at: GI-48, G T Karnal road, Industrial area, Azadpur, Delhi-110033 .…… Applicant/Operational Creditor
VERSUS
M/S ORKUS PVT. LTD. Having Its Registered address at: C-483, Yojana Vihar, New Delhi-110092 …… Respondent/Corporate Debtor
Order Pronounced On: 07.12.2023 CORAM: SHRI BACHU VENKAT BALARAM DAS, HON'BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL) SHRI ATUL CHATURVEDI, HON'BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
ORDER PER: BACHU VENKAT BALARAM DAS, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
1. This Application has been filed by M/s. JPM Industries Limited the Operational Creditor under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
IB – 453/ND/2022
Code, 2016 (“IBC” or “Code”) r/w Rule 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016, (“Adjudicating Authority Rules”), for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) against M/s. Orkus Private Limited, the Respondent/Corporate Debtor, who has failed to pay the Operational debt amounting to Rs. 4,96,15,567.26/- (Four Core Ninety-Six Lakhs Fifteen Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Seven and Twenty-Six Paisa Only) which includes Principal amount of Rs. 2,88,36,791/- (Rupees Two Crore Eighty-Eight Lakhs Thirty- Six Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety-One Only) and total interest of Rs. 2,07,78,776.26/- (Rupees Two Crore Seven Lakh Seventy-Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy-Six and Twenty-Six Paisa Only).
2. The Applicant namely, M/s. JPM Industries Limited (Operational Creditor) is a Company having its office at GI-48, G T Karnal road, Industrial area, Azadpur, Delhi-110033 and is in the business of manufacturing of Auto parts, Solar Lamps, LED bulbs, energy meters etc.
3. The Respondent Company namely, M/s. Orkus Private Limited (Corporate Debtor) is a private Limited Company incorporated under Companies Act, 2013 on 06.03.2017 [CIN-U7499DL2017PTC313952], having its registered office at C-483, Yojana Vihar, New Delhi-110092. The Corporate Debtor has Authorised Share Capital of Rs. 25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Lakhs Only) and Paid up Share Capital of Rs. 25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Lakhs Only).
4. Submissions of the Operational Creditor i) The Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor were engaged in business dealings from past 3 years. The Operational Creditor used to supply LED Bulbs to the Corporate Debtor.
ii) The Corporate Debtor issued 11 purchase orders between the month of April 2019 and February 2020 to the Operational Creditor for supply of LED Bulbs of different watts. Accordingly, the Operational Creditor supplied 1431881 LED bulbs to the Corporate Debtor which were duly
IB – 453/ND/2022 delivered. The following table shows the purchase orders issued by Corporate Debtor to Operational Creditor: - S.No. Purchase Date Quantity Net total Grand Total Order (in no. of Amount of of purchase No. Pieces) Purchase orders including orders GST 1. 770.030 27.04.2019 255000 11210000 12555200 2. 770.081 29.05.2019 355000 16770000 18782400 3. 770.090 31.05.2019 60000 2550000 2856000 4. 770.111 24.06.2019 10000 390000 436800 5. 770.113 26.06.2019 155000 6862500 7686000 6. 770.178 04.09.2019 160000 8562500 9590000 7. 770.178 04.09.2019 117000 4930500 5522160 8. 770.192 21.09.2019 155000 788700 7361200 9. 70.255 13.12.2019 53881 2321135 2599671.20 10. 70.255 14.12.2019 91000 3627000 4062240 11. 70.342 04.02.2020 20000 940000 1052800 TOTAL 1431881 58952335 72504471.2 iii) The Operational Creditor raised invoices between June 2019 to February 2020 against the supply of goods for an amount of Rs. 2,88,36,791/-. The Corporate Debtor vide e-mail dated 20.03.2020 sent the Ledger account maintained by the Corporate Debtor in the name of the Operational creditor admitting the liability of Rs.2,87,57,265/- (Rupees Two Crore Eighty-Seven Lakh Fifty-Seven Thousand Two Hundred and Sixty-Five Only). In spite of admitting the liability, the Corporate Debtor defaulted in paying the outstanding amount.
iv) The Operational Creditor sent a Demand Notice on 05.10.2021 under Section 8 of the Code to the Corporate Debtor. No response was received from the Corporate Debtor to the Demand Notice. Hence, the application under Section 9 of IBC, 2016.
IB – 453/ND/2022
5. The Corporate Debtor in its reply affidavit submitted that there were certain disputes regarding the quality of goods. The Operational Creditor didn’t supply the good in time which lead to heavy loss of the Corporate Debtor. Further due to covid-19 lockdown, the business was affected and the financial position of the Corporate Debtor became very fragile and it suffered heavy losses.
6. Analysis and Findings i) We have heard the Ld. Counsels appearing for both the parties and also perused the records.
ii) It is an admitted case that the Operational Creditor issued invoices amounting to Rs. 2,88,36,791/- to the Corporate Debtor, pursuant to the work order issued by the Corporate Debtor for supply of LED Bulbs. The Corporate Debtor submitted that there were some issues with regard to the quality of goods supplied but couldn’t substantiate the same by placing on record any evidence to that effect. The Corporate Debtor in its reply affidavit has clearly admitted the default and has stated that he is not in a position to make the payment. The relevant paras of the Reply are reproduced hereunder- “Para 8- It is expected that these efforts for recovery of dues from the market put in the last one year will start yielding results, but as of now Corporate Debtor /Orkus Pvt Ltd is not able to meet its obligations to creditors, including JPM/Operational Creditor.”
“Para 9- However, we accept that we are not able to pay the amount due to JPM/Operational Creditor as of now because of the operations having stopped and recovery of book debts from the market taking time.”
In view of the clear admission made by the Corporate Debtor we are constrained to admit the present application.
IB – 453/ND/2022
7. Order In view of the above facts and circumstances and the foregoing discussion, we are satisfied that the present petition fulfils the criteria laid down under Section 9 of the Code. It is accordingly, hereby ordered as follows: - i. The Application bearing IB-453/ND/2022 filed by the Applicant under Section 9 of the Code r/w Rule 6 of the Adjudicating Authority Rules for initiating CIRP against the Respondent is hereby admitted.
ii. We also declare a moratorium in terms of Section 14 of the Code. The necessary consequences of imposing the moratorium flows from the provisions of Section 14(1)(a), (b), (c) & (d) of the Code. Thus, the following prohibitions are imposed: i. “The institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the corporate debtor including execution of any judgment, decree or order in any court of law, tribunal, arbitration panel or other authority; ii. Transferring, encumbering, alienating or disposing of by the corporate debtor any of its assets or any legal right or beneficial interest therein; iii. Any action to foreclose, recover or enforce any security interest created by the corporate debtor in respect of its property including any action under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002; iv. The recovery of any property by an owner or lessor, where such property is occupied by or in the possession of the corporate debtor. [Explanation.-For the purposes of this sub-section, it is hereby clarified that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, a licence, permit, registration, quota, concession, clearance or a similar grant or right given by IB – 453/ND/2022 the Central Government, State Government, local authority, sectoral regulator or any other authority constituted under any other law for the time being in force, shall not be suspended or terminated on the grounds of insolvency, subject to the condition that there is no default in payment of current dues arising for the use or continuation of the license, permit, registration, quota, concession, clearances or a similar grant or right during the moratorium period;]”
iii. It is made clear that the provisions of moratorium shall not apply to transactions which might be notified by the Central Government or the supply of the essential goods or services to the Corporate Debtor as may be specified, are not to be terminated or suspended or interrupted during the moratorium period. In addition, as per the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2018 which has come into force w.e.f. 06.06.2018, the provisions of moratorium shall not apply to the surety in a contract of guarantee to the corporate debtor in terms of Section 14(3)(b) of the Code.
iv. Since section 9(4) of the code does not make it mandatory for the Operational Creditor to propose the name of the Resolution Professional along with the application to act as Interim Resolution Professional for the Corporate Debtor, the Operational Creditor has not proposed any name of the Resolution Professional. Therefore, this Adjudicating Authority appoints Mr. Bimal Kumar Sharma, as the Insolvency Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor from the available list of panel of Resolution Professionals as maintained by IBBI. The registration number of the IRP is IBBI/IPA-001/IP- P00542/2017-2018/10967, and the e-mail id of the IRP is sharma_bimal@rediffmail.com. Therefore, the IRP shall file a valid Authorization for Assignment along with Written Consent in Form-2 and Registration Certificate within 3 days of the pronouncement of this order. Accordingly, Mr. Bimal Kumar Sharma is appointed as IRP.
IB – 453/ND/2022 v. In pursuance of Section 13(2) of the Code, we direct the IRP, as the case may be to make a public announcement immediately with regard to the admission of this application under Section 9 of the Code. The expression immediately means within three days as clarified by Explanation to Regulation 6(1) of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016. vi. During the CIRP period, the management of the Corporate Debtor shall vest in the IRP/RP, in terms of Section 17 of the IBC. The officers and managers of the Corporate Debtor shall provide all documents in their possession and furnish every information in their knowledge to the IRP within one week from the date of receipt of this order, in default of which coercive steps will follow. There shall be no future opportunity given in this regard.
vii. The IRP is expected to take full charge of the Corporate Debtor’s assets, and documents without any delay whatsoever. He is also free to take police assistance and this Court hereby directs the Police Authorities to render all assistance as may be required by the IRP in this regard.
viii. The IRP or the RP, as the case may be shall submit to this Adjudicating Authority periodical report with regard to the progress of the CIRP in respect of the Corporate Debtor.
ix. The Operational Creditor shall deposit a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Only) with the IRP to meet the expenses arising out of issuing public notice and inviting claims. These expenses are subject to the approval of the Committee of Creditors (“CoC”).
x. In terms of the Code, the Registry is hereby directed to communicate a copy of the order to the Operational Creditor, the Corporate Debtor, the IRP and the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana,
IB – 453/ND/2022 by Speed Post and by email, at the earliest but not later than seven days from today. The Registrar of Companies shall update his website by updating the status of the Corporate Debtor and specific mention regarding admission of this petition must be notified.
xi. The Registry is further directed to send a copy of this order to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (“IBBI”) for their record.
Sd/- Sd/- (ATUL CHATURVEDI) (BACHU VENKAT BALARAM DAS) MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
IB – 453/ND/2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free