Miss Lucy
← All judgments

In the matter of Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited

National Company Law Tribunal22 December 2023

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Tribunal, having been asked to approve a resolution plan under Sections 30(6) and 31 of the Code, declined to approve it at this stage and instead returned the matter to the Committee of Creditors for reconsideration of the plan's feasibility and viability, its compliance with Section 30(2) insofar as it affects the registered land deeds of homebuyers, and the resolution applicant's capacity to implement the plan within its net worth; it further held that any relief in the plan whose underlying contract, agreement, proceeding or notice is not specifically identified, or which relates to future or contingent liability, shall not be acceded to at this stage.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNALKOCHI BENCHIA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023(U/s 30(6), 31 of IBC, 2016)INCP(IBC)/1/KOB/2021In the matter of:M/s Nucleus Premium PropertiesPrivate LimitedMemo of Parties:1. Dileep K PResolution Professional of M/sNucleus Premium Properties PrivateLimited.IBBI/1PA/IP-001/IP01310/2018-2019/12220, Veluthedath House,Ponnurunni, Vytilla P O, Kochi, Pin.682019…Applicant

Order delivered on: 22.12.2023 Coram: Hon’ble Member (Judicial) : TMT. Justice (Retd.) T. Krishna Valli Hon’ble Member (Technical): Shri. Shyam Babu Gautam. Appearances: For the Applicant : Mr. N R Krishnan Unni, CS Mr. Dileep K P, RP

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

INTERIM ORDER Per: Shyam Babu Gautam Member (Technical)

1. This application is filed under section 30(60) and section 31 of the Code for the approval of a resolution Plan in respect of M/s Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘Corporate Debtor’ or ‘CD’). The Resolution Professional filed the present application on 01.08.2023 for approval of the Resolution Plan, which was approved by the Committee of Creditors (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CoC’) with a 100 per cent in its 12th CoC held on 28/07/2023.

2. The facts as narrated in the application are summarised hereunder:

3. The underlying Company Petition CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021, filed by Mr Anoop John & 3 others against the Corporate Debtor under Section 7 of the Code, was admitted by this Tribunal and Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated against the Corporate Debtor on 18.11.2021. Mr Dileep K P, IBBI/1PA/IP- 001/IP01310/2018-2019/12220 was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (hereinafter referred to as ‘IRP’). The CoC in its first meeting held on 30.12.2021 decided to appoint the IRP as the Resolution Professional (‘RP’).

4. The Corporate Debtor has been undertaking Real Estate Projects which were delayed and under various stages of construction. The KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

RP admitted 238 claims till 90 days which is the maximum period allowed for submission of claims as follows:

Amount No. of of Claim Sl. Claims Creditors admitted No. admitted Rs in crore

Secured financial creditors (other 1 than financial creditors belonging 1 1.41 to any class of creditors)

Unsecured Financial Creditors 2. 199 111.89 belonging to any class of creditors

3. Operational Creditors (Employees) 7 0.35

Operational Creditors 3. 3 14.61 (Government) Operational Creditors (other than 4. Workmen and Employees and 27 10.36 Government Dues)

Total 237 138.62 5. The constitution of CoC consists of 199 homebuyers with a 98.75% voting share and one financial creditor, State Bank of India with a 1.25% voting share. Homebuyers are represented by the Authorised Representative, Mr Mohan TS, an Insolvency Professional approved by NCLT on 17.02.2022.

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

6. The CIRP commenced on 18.11.2021, but due to the large number of claims from homebuyers and on account of the Covid third wave, the CIRP was extended. An overall extension of 330 days in the CIRP period besides 120 days of the exclusion period was sought.

7. During this time the Resolution Professional had invited Expression of Interest from Prospective Resolution Applicants by public announcement in Form G. Accordingly the Resolution Professional received two bids, one from the Ex-promoter/suspended director of the Corporate Debtor (who was found qualified as per Section 240 A of the Code being a SME unit), subsequently did not submit any Resolution Plan. After the third CoC meeting a second EOI application was invited by giving an advertisement on 26.04.2022, but no fresh EOI’s were received.

8. Then the request of a Resolution Plan was issued to the Sole Prospective Resolution Applicant, Mr Sumit Khanna requesting to submit the Resolution Plan by 18.06.2022. Draft Resolution Plan submitted by the Resolution Applicant which was subject to a series of Project wise discussions but the Resolution Plan was rejected in the 6th CoC meeting held on 23.09.2022 with 100% voting rights.

9. In the 7th CoC held on 28.09.2022 decided to seek the proposal for project-wise resolution and this Tribunal approved the KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

application for attempting Project Wise resolution as of the view that there may be a chance of successful resolution of the Corporate Debtor as per order dated 04.11.2022. Thereafter on 8th CoC which was held on 14.11.2022 based on the approval by 76.36% voting share of home allottees decided that the Resolution Professional to publish one more Form G inviting EOI. EOI was published on 15.11.2022. Thus, Resolution Professional received two EOI’s, 1) M/s Buildwell and 2) M/s BR Nirman.

10. Both the proposed Resolution Applicants satisfied the eligibility criteria under Section 29A of the Code and detailed Resolution Plans were received. Both the Resolution Plans were subject to deep scrutiny but the project-wise Resolution Plan submitted by Raymound Project, Riva Apartments and Eleganza Projects did not comply with the mandatory provisions of the Code and various regulations and amendments thereunder. The reason for the non-acceptance of the Resolution Plan was communicated to Resolution Applicants as per a letter dated 14.01.2023. Thereafter the Resolution Plans submitted by the aforesaid Resolution Applicants were found in compliance with the Code, which was circulated to all homebuyers and project-wise meetings conducted from 18.01.2023 to 22.01.2023 to negotiate the terms and conditions. Based on the outcome of these meetings, both the Resolution Applicants modified and resubmitted the KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

same on 26.01.2023 which was circulated among the homebuyers on the same day. Both the Resolution Plans were placed for e-voting from 28.01.2023 to 29.01.2023.

11. With regard to Plan A- (Buildwell), 41.99% of home allottees who participated in the voting agreed in favour of Plan A, while 57.58% disagreed and 0.43 who participated abstained from voting. In the case of Plan B- (P.S.Baburam, BR Nirman), 0.87% of home allottees who participated in voting agreed in favour while 99.13% disagreed. The Authorized Representative cast his vote in terms of Section 25 (3A). In terms of Regulation 39(3)(B) of IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, CoC decided that one more e-voting of home allottees to be conducted on Plan A- Buildwell who received the highest votes on 02.02.2023 to 03.02.2023. However, the Resolution Applicant of Plan A-Buildwell failed to qualify for the re-voting also.

12. Accordingly, this Tribunal ordered the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor vide IA(IBC)/74/KOB/2023 on 17.03.2023. Mr Dileep K P, a Resolution Professional was appointed as the Liquidator. While the liquidation process was going on, Raymount and Riva Project Allottees Association along with a group of home allottees have preferred an appeal in Hon’ble NCLAT Chennai against the order of liquidation. The Appellants pleaded for setting aside the order of liquidation and allowing

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

the CoC to reconsider the modified Resolution Plan submitted by M/s Buildwell. The Hon’ble NCLAT Chennai ordered to keep the order of liquidation in abeyance and directed to consider the revised Resolution Plan submitted by M/s Buildwell by the CoC.

13. Accordingly, the modified Resolution Plan submitted by M/s Buildwell was kept for voting on 26.07.2023 to 27.07.2023. Out of 199 home allottees with voting rights, home allottees with 67.48% voted in favour of the Resolution. Home allottees with 18.82% voted against the Resolution Plan. Home allottees with 12.45% abstained from voting. Therefore, 78.19% of the home allottees by voting share who participated in the e-voting voted in favour of the Resolution Plan. 12th Coc held on 28.07.2023 voted in favour of the Resolution Plan with 100% voting.

14. As per the order of Hon’ble NCLAT, the order of Liquidation remains suspended till 02.08.2023. This application was filed by the Resolution Professional for the approval of the Resolution Plan on 01.08.2023.

15. The Successful Resolution Applicant had duly accepted the ‘Letter of Intent’ which was issued by the Resolution Professional as per the provisions of RFRP on 28.07.2023.

16. The Successful Resolution Applicant has provided a cash security deposit of Rs 26,16,035/- (Rupees twenty-six lakhs

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

sixteen thousand and thirty-five only) in the designated Resolution Account, copy of bank statement evidencing the same attested by SBI, Edapally Branch has been produced as Annexure E.

17. The Applicant has submitted the details of various compliances as envisaged by the Code and the CIRP Regulations which a Resolution Plan is required to adhere to, as follows:

Section of Requirement with Clause of Compliance the respect to Resolution Resolution (Yes / No) Code/Reg. Plan Plan

Whether the Resolution Applicant meets the criteria approved by the CoC 25(2)(h) Yes having regard to the complexity and scale of operations of business of the CD?

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

Whether the Resolution Applicant is Notarised eligible to submit a affidavit in resolution plan as per 29A pages no.38 to Yes final list of Resolution 43 Professional or Order, if any, of the Adjudicating Authority

Whether the Notarised Resolution Applicant affidavit in 30(1) has submitted an pages no.38 to Yes affidavit stating that it 43 is eligible?

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

Whether the Resolution Plan- a) Provides for the payment of insolvency 4.3.1 Yes resolution process costs? b) Provides for the payment to the operational Yes 4.3.2 creditors? c) provides for the payment to the financial 30(2) creditors who NA NA did not vote in favour of the resolution plan? d) provides for the management of the affairs of the 7.2 Yes corporate debtor? e) provides for the implementation and supervision 7.2.2 Yes of the Resolution Plan

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

(f) contravenes any of the provisions of the law for the 4.1.9 time being in Yes force?

Whether the Resolution Plan (a) is feasible and Yes Section viable, according 4.1.10 to the CoC? 30(4) (b) has been approved by the Yes with 100% CoC with 66% NA vote voting share?

Whether the Resolution Plan has provisions for its Section effective 7.2.1, 7.2.2 Yes 31(1) implementation plan, according to the CoC?

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

Where the resolution professional made a determination if the CD been subjected to any 6.2.(iii) Yes Regulation transaction of the 6.2.(iv) nature covered 35A under sections 6.2.(v) 43, 45, 50 or 66, before the one hundred and fifteenth day of the insolvency commencement date, under intimation to the Board? Whether the amount due to the operational creditors under Regulation the resolution 4.3.2 Yes 38(1) plan has been given priority in payment over financial creditors? Whether the resolution plan includes a Regulation statement as to 4.3, Yes 38(1A) how it has dealt 6.1 with the interests of all stakeholders?

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

i. Whether the Resolution Applicant or any of its related parties has failed to implement or contributed to the failure of No implementation of any resolution plan approved Regulation under the Code. 38(1B)

ii. If so, whether NA the Resolution Applicant has submitted the statement giving details of such non implementation?

Whether the Resolution Plan provides:

(a) the term of the plan and Regulation its 38(2) 7.1 Yes, implementat ion schedule?

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

(b) for the managemen t and control of the 7.2 Yes business of the corporate debtor during its term?

(c) adequate means for 7.2.2 Yes supervising its implementat ion?

Whether the resolution plan demonstrates that a) it addresses 3.1.2 Yes the cause of default? Regulation 38(3) b) it is feasible 4.1.10 Yes and viable?

c) it has provisions for its 7.2, 7.2.2 Yes effective implementat ion?

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

d) (d) it has provisions for 7.2.4 Yes approvals required and the timeline for the same? e) (e) the resolution 4.1.5 Yes applicant has the capability to implement the resolution plan?

Whether the RP has filed applications in Section respect of transactions 6.2 Yes 39(2) observed, found or determined by him?

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

Provide details of performance Regulation security received, 7.5 Yes 39(4) as referred to in sub-regulation (4A) of regulation 36B.

18. As required by Section 30(1) read with Regulation 39(1)(a) of the CIRP Regulations, the Applicant submits that the Resolution Applicant has submitted a certificate of eligibility under Section 29A of the Code vide notarized affidavit dated 29.11.2022. In terms of Regulation 39(1)(c) of the CIRP Regulations, an undertaking has been submitted by the successful Resolution Applicant, disclosed on page 99 of the application.

19. The applicant has filed a Compliance Certificate in prescribed form i.e., Form "H" in compliance with regulation 39(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

(Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) regulations 2016, along with copy of Bank statement of receipt of performance security as required under regulation 36B(4A) is produced as Annexure E.

20. The Resolution Applicant requests, proposes and prays for the following reliefs and concessions to be granted to the Corporate Debtor and/or the Resolution Applicant, as the case may be, on the Approval Date.

Sl. Relief/Concessions/Waiver sought Status no

1. All debts and dues, liability or obligations which are included in the Resolution plan shall be deemed to have been irrevocably waived, and permanently extinguished and written off in Full, with effect from the effective date. On effective date, any claims by any person 2. whether submitted to Resolution Professional or not. admitted by Resolution Professional or not, due or contingent, asserted or un-asserted. crystallised or uncrystallised, known or unknown, secured or unsecured. disputed or undisputed or pending adjudication in any forum, present or future against the Corporate Debtor accrued as on the insolvency commencement date against the Corporate Debtor, whether arising under the subsisting lease/sub-lease, consents, licenses,

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

approvals, rights, entitlements, benefits and privileges whether under law, contract, lease or license, granted in favour of the Corporate Debtor or any contractual arrangements entered into by the Corporate Debtor, shall notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in their terms, stand extinguished without any recourse 3. With respect to all the dues including taxes/ cess/ interest 1’ penalty and other liabilities outstanding towards GST, VAT. Service Tax. Sales Tax. Income Tax. RoC or any other statutory authority its presumed that the respective Statutory Authorities have submitted their claim to the Resolution Professional as part of the CIRP process and all such existing liabilities shall be dealt with as provided in this Resolution Plan. No new such liability shall arise on the Resolution Applicant for the period prior to the Effective Date.

4. To seek the benefit of all Exemptions under Income Tax. GST. VAT, Service Tax etc from the appropriate authorities as available to Companies that have undergone Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and a Resolution Plan has been approved by the Hon’ble NCLT.

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

5. Any legal action of any kind or nature pending the occurrence of the Effective Date, no creditor or stakeholder shall be entitled to institute or continue any suits or proceedings including execution of any judgment, decree or order in any court of law, tribunal, arbitration panel or authority against the Corporate Debtor or take any action to foreclose, recover or enforce any security interest created by the Corporate Debtor with respect to the Claims in respect of its property or otherwise including but not limited to the Litigation cases as mentioned in the Information Memorandum. 6. The Allottees shall withdraw all existing claims filed in any court of law and all orders/decrees passed by any court of law shall stand nullified and all Allottees shall be dealt with in accordance with this Resolution Plan. 7. The Corporate Debtor should not be subject to any claims of subrogation or have any of' its assets attached or frozen or garnished or any of them being subject to restraint or restriction of any manner, in each case including whether provisionally or otherwise. 8. The Allottees to accept the new time period for completion of the construction of the projects of the Corporate Debtor. as contemplated under the Resolution Plan.

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

9. To absolve the Resolution Applicant from any liability arising due to the outcome of any legal proceeding on any legal cases pending against the Corporate Debtor as on the Effective Date. 10. Extinguish all liabilities in relation of corporate guarantees, indemnities etc provided by the Corporate Debtor as on the Effective Date. 11. The Resolution Applicant shall neither be liable to honor unevolved bank guarantee/letters of credit, nor shall it be obliged to renew the bank guarantee/letters of credit or provide any assistance to the respective creditors to contest or defend any claims that are raised by the beneficiary. The satisfaction or payment by the respective creditors upon receipt of any claims in connection with the unevolved bank guarantees/letters of credit shall not be construed as a default on part of the Corporate Debtor and any modifications required in the bank guarantee/letter of credit documents to reflect such arrangement shall be made by the respective creditors.

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

12. The Resolution Applicant and Corporate Debtor shall not be liable for any payments against any contingent liability whether mentioned in the Information Memorandum or not included in the Information Memorandum but not limited to liabilities on account of bank guarantees given to customers or any other entity, other than as proposed in this Resolution Plan 13. Any claims made under any guarantees issued by the Corporate Debtor on behalf of any third party shall also stand extinguished as a part of this Resolution Plan and the beneficiaries of such guarantees shall be expected to recover the monies with respect to un-invoked guarantees from the principal borrower and for any shortfall, they shall not have any recourse against the Corporate Debtor and for the Resolution Applicant. 14. All claims and rights against the Corporate Debtor by any Related Party to the Corporate Debtor, which are not expressly provided for in this Resolution Plan, shall stand irrevocably and unconditionally extinguished. 15. All claims and rights of the erstwhile Shareholders or Directors against the Corporate Debtor shall stand irrevocably and unconditionally extinguished.

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

16. All existing encumbrances. charges. security interest etc. with respect to the Claims in respect of the assets of the Company and or otherwise shall stand cancelled and discharged. 17. Revocation of all power of attorneys provided by the Corporate Debtor to any person as on the effective date. 18. All outstanding negotiable instruments issued by the Corporate Debtor including demand promissory notes. post-dated cheques, bills of exchange, letters of credit etc. shall stand terminated and the Liability of the Corporate Debtor under such instruments shall stand extinguished other than those issued by Resolution Professional during the CIRP process and disclosed to Resolution Applicant. 19. The Corporate Debtor, Resolution Applicant, and their Board of Directors (appointed after Effective Date) shall not be liable for any action taken pursuant to bouncing of cheques issued by the earlier management/promoter of the Corporate Debtor and accordingly all such payments shall be deemed to be settled in terms of this Resolution Plan by virtue of settlement of dues of the Operational Creditors or creditors in class as the case may be.

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

20. All actions with regard to the assets/claims/rights etc as mentioned in the Balance Sheet of the Corporate Debtor. as well as off balance sheet items. as on the Effective Date shall be the assets/claims/rights of the Resolution Applicant and shall be dealt with at its sole discretion. 21. Subject to applicable regulations and bye laws, the Resolution Applicant shall be allowed to undertake redesigning of the project sites, based on its own viability assessments. 22. Subject to applicable regulations and bye laws, any additional FAR on any basis/Ground coverage relating to the project sites permitted under the master plan shall vest with the Corporate Debtor and no further payments shall be payable to authority for such additional FAR/ Ground coverage or height coverage. 23. Any event of default having occurred on part of the Corporate Debtor under any of the financing documents entered into by the Corporate Debtor on its own behalf or on behalf of subsidiaries (if any), joint ventures or associates to secure or guarantee any of their liabilities, prior to the Effective Date, shall be waived in entirety and all rights under the existing finance documents in relation thereto shall stand extinguished.

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

24. No consequence of liability arising out of any criminal not done by the Corporate Debtor and/or its management shall fall upon the Resolution Applicant or any employees, directors, representatives of Resolution Applicant and the Corporate Debtor 25. Neither shall the Resolution Applicant nor the Corporate Debtor nor their respective directors, officers, consultants, and employees to be appointed after the Approval Date be liable for any violations, liabilities, penalties or lines with respect to or pursuant to the Corporate Debtor not having in place the requisite licenses and approvals required to undertake its business as per Applicable Laws and the Resolution Applicant seeks a time period of l2 months from the Effective Date, to ensure renewal of such consents/licenses and approvals. 26. Kerala Real Estate Regulatory Authority [K- RERA Authority) shall extend the registration of the projects in in respect of which the K-RERA registration has lapsed. Till the time the registration of the project is extended by K—RERA. construction work shall be allowed to continue, including advertisement etc. without any hindrance or obstruction. 27. Exemption from compliance of extinguishment of the shares of the current shareholders of M/s Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

28. Allow Fresh allotment of shares in the name of Resolution Applicant and persons nominated by the Resolution Applicant. 29. ROC may be directed to approve the appointment of new Directors of the Company, who are proposed by the Resolution Applicant alter the Approval of this Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority and the mandatory compliance for the change of Directors may be waived off. 30. To permit amendment of the Constitutional documents of the Corporate Debtor. 31. That all the liability of the Corporate Debtor for any offence committed prior to the commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution process shall cease and the Corporate Debtor shall not be prosecuted for any such offence from the date the Resolution Plan has been approved by the Adjudicating Authority and No action shall be taken against any property of the Corporate Debtor in relation to any offence committed prior to the commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of the Corporate Debtor.

21. It is directed that any relief sought in the resolution plan, where the contract/ agreement/ understanding/ proceedings/ actions/ notice etc. is not specifically identified or is for future and contingent liability, is at this moment not acceded to.

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

DETAILS OF RESOLUTION PLAN/PAYMENT SCHEDULE

22. The applicant submits the relevant information with regard to the amount proposed to be paid by the Resolution Applicant, under the said resolution plan is tabulated as under:

Description Amount Proposed payments Insolvency Resolution Rs.93,61,000/- Within 3 months of Cost approval date (Date of order of NCLT) Amount payable to Rs.1,41,58,032/- Within 6 months of secured financial approval date (Date creditor (State Bank of of order of NCLT) India) Amount payable to Rs. 4,54,815/- Within 6 months of operational creditors - approval date (Date Employees of order of NCLT) Amount payable as Rs.21,86,500/- Within 18 months settlement of claims of of approval date Verdant allottees (Date of order of NCLT) Total Rs.2,61,60,347/- 23. The Resolution Professional further submitted that the contents of the Resolution Plan submitted by the Resolution Applicants were found to comply with the provisions of the Code and various regulations thereunder.

Findings:

24. In light of the submissions made and a comprehensive examination of the Resolution Plan submitted by the Resolution Professional, numerous inadequacies have been identified therein. It is imperative to acknowledge that the KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

Corporate Debtor comprises 199 home buyers, and for a successful resolution for the Corporate Debtor, we are directing the Committee of Creditors to consider the following aspects:

I. The CoC is directed to reconsider the question of feasibility and viability of the Plan

II. The CoC will relook into the matter concerning the compliance of the resolution plan with Section 30(2) of the Code, particularly with regard to the annulment of the registration of the land deeds of the homebuyers.

III. The CoC shall reconsider the question as to whether the Resolution Applicant is capable of implementing the Plan to the extent of his net worth.

25. Hence putting in mind the time-bound process of CIRP, the CoC shall consider the aforementioned aspects and submit the decisions/report before this Tribunal within 3 weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

26. In view of this order, all the connected interlocutory applications bearing IA(IBC)/349/KOB/2023, IA(IBC)/348/KOB/2023, IA(IBC)/351/KOB/2023, IA(IBC)/363/KOB/2023, IA(IBC)/381/KOB/2023, IA(IBC)/324/KOB/2023, IA(IBC)/485/KOB/2023, IA(IBC)360/KOB/2023 which has been reserved, is de-reserved accordingly.

KOCHI BENCH IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 in CP(IBC)/01/KOB/2021 In re: M/s. Nucleus Premium Properties Private Limited.

27. The Resolution Professional/Applicant herein shall forthwith send a copy of this order to the CoC and the Resolution Applicant for necessary compliance.

28. The registry is also directed to forthwith send a copy of this order to the CoC and the Resolution Applicant.

29. The certified copy of this order may be issued, if applied for, upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

30. List the above IA(IBC)/325/KOB/2023 for further proceedings on 19.01.2024.

Digitally signed by SHYAM BABU T.KRISHNAVA Digitally signed by SHYAM BABU GAUTAM T.KRISHNAVALLI GAUT AM Date: 2023.12.22 LLI Date: 2023.12.22 14:10:16 14:10:31 +05'30' +05'30' SHYAM BABU GAUTAM TMT. JUSTICE T KRISHNA VALLI (MEMBER TECHNICAL) (MEMBER JUDICIAL)

Dated this the 22st day of December 2023.

Krishna

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free