In the matter of Manthan Broadband Services Private Limited
- CitationIA (IB) No. 1185-KB-2023 with C.P. (IB) No.1634-KB-2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A bidder in a liquidation e-auction who has not been declared an unsuccessful bidder, and whose name has not been announced as H-1 or H-2 in a manner that resolves the bid, is not entitled to a refund of earnest money deposit; until the successful bidder is declared on the Liquidator's application under the Tribunal's liberty order, the claim for refund remains contingent on that outcome.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH (Court-II) KOLKATA C.P. (IB) No.1634/KB/2018 With IA (IB) No. 1185/KB/2023 An Application under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016; In the matter of: Alliance Broadband Services Private Limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 53A, Dr. Lala Mohan Bhattacharyya Road, 2nd Floor, Kolkata - 700014. … … Financial Creditor Versus M/s. Manthan Broadband Services Private Limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 6, Ganesh Chandra Avenue, 3rd Floor, Kolkata – 700013. … … Corporate Debtor And In the matter of: M/s. Regent Vinimay Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 67F, Hindustan Park, 2nd Floor, Kolkata – 700029 in the State of West Bengal. Versus Mr. Kuldeep Verma, Liquidator of Manthan Broadband Services private Limited, having its office at 46, B.B. Ganguli Street, 5th Floor, Unit No.501, Kolkata – 700012 in the State of West Bengal … … Respondent Date of Hearing: 27.09.2023 Date of Pronouncement of Order: 18.10.2023 CORAM: SMT. BIDISHA BANERJEE, HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL) SHRI ARVIND DEVANATHAN, HON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Appearance (via video conferencing/physically) Mr. Rishav Banerjee, Adv. ] For the Applicant in IA(I.B.C.)/334(KB)2023 Mr. S. Singha Sen, Adv. ] Mr. Shaunak Mitra, Adv. ] For the Applicant in IA(I.B.C.)/1185(KB)2023 Mr. D. Majumdar, Adv. ] Mr. P.P. Bishwal, Adv. ] Ms. Manju Bhuteria, Adv. ] For the Liquidator Mr. R. Auddy, Adv. ] Mr. A. Gooptu, Adv. ]
KOLKATA BENCH (Court-II) KOLKATA C.P. (IB) No.1634/KB/2018 With IA (IB) No. 1185/KB/2023
O R D E R
Per: Bidisha Banerjee, Member (Judicial) 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. This application has been preferred by M/s. Regent Vinimay Private Limited in connection with C.P.(IB)/1634(KB)/2023 filed by Alliance Broadband Private Limited (Financial Creditor) against Manthan Broadband Private Limited (Corporate Debtor) 3. Facts in a Nutshell: (i) The Section 7 petition preferred by Alliance Broadband Private Limited was admitted by this Tribunal vide its order dated 18th September, 2019. Since no resolution could be achieved, vide order dated 6th April, 2022, this Tribunal passed an order for liquidation and the erstwhile RP, Mr. Kuldeep Verma was appointed as Liquidator. (ii) The Liquidator published the sale notice dated 6th December, 2022 for sell of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern in accordance with 32 (e), 32A, 33 (1) and Schedule-I of the IBBI Liquidation Process Regulations. A further notice was published on 11th January, 2023. The last date for submission of the expression of interest was 27th January, 2023. (iii) The applicant submitted his expression of interest vide mail dated 25th January, 2023 to participate in the e-Auction process for block assets of the Corporate Debtor. (iv) Vide e-mail dated 27th January, 2023, he was asked to provide some more documents. (v) Further vide e-mail dated 8th February, 2023, he was declared as a qualified bidder for the proposed e-Auction. The last date of submission of earnest money was 11th February, 2023 and the applicant deposited the EMD of Rs.90,000/- on 8th February, 2023. E-Auction was proposed for 14th February, 2023 and the applicant claims that he was declared as the second highest bidder. (vi) On 14th February, 2023 itself, this Tribunal passed an order allowing the e- Auction as proposed on 14th February, 2023 to be conducted which shall,
KOLKATA BENCH (Court-II) KOLKATA C.P. (IB) No.1634/KB/2018 With IA (IB) No. 1185/KB/2023 however, abide by the result in IA(I.B.C)/334(KB)/2023 preferred by Mr. Rajib Dhamija and others being the Member of the Suspended Board. (vii) It was further directed that consequential action in regard to the auction shall be conducted only with the liberty of this Tribunal, and a report to that effect shall be submitted by the Liquidator on the next date of hearing which was 15th March, 2023. Since March, 2023, the applicant started claiming a refund of the EMD as an “unsuccessful” bidder. He has come up with an application seeking a refund of EMD. (viii) Learned Counsel Mr. Shaunak Mitra would submit that being an unsuccessful bidder, the applicant has every right to seek a refund of EMD to that effect learned Counsel would draw our attention to the timeline of the e-Auction process which appears at page 35 of the e-Auction process information document. (ix) Clause 14 of the e-Auction process information document allows the EMD to be refunded to the unsuccessful bidder. Learned Counsel refers to the decision of Nitin Jain vs. Lucky Holdings. 4. Per contra, Mrs. Manju Bhuteria, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Liquidator would vehemently oppose the stand and submit that the applicant being the H-2 bidder cannot claim himself as an unsuccessful bidder and seek a refund of the EMD. He has to wait until the names of H-1 and H-2 bidders are announced and till the H-1 bidder fails to comply with the provisions. Thus, till an announcement is made in regard to the successful bidder, the applicant cannot claim himself as an unsuccessful bidder and seek a refund of the EMD. 5. We have considered the rival contentions and perused the records. We are aware of the order passed on 14th February, 2023, whereby and whereunder, the Liquidator was asked to seek liberty of this Tribunal while taking forward any consequential action in regard to the auction. 6. The liquidator has already preferred an application seeking liberty to declare the H-1 bidder. Therefore, till such time, the said declaration is made, the applicant who wants to withdraw himself from the bid, unless declared as an unsuccessful bidder, cannot claim a refund of EMD.
KOLKATA BENCH (Court-II) KOLKATA C.P. (IB) No.1634/KB/2018 With IA (IB) No. 1185/KB/2023
7. Since the learned Counsel Mr. Shaunak Mitra heavily presses for disposal of this IA, we do hereby order that the claim for refund will depend upon the outcome of the application filed by the Liquidator to declare the successful bidder. Depending upon the outcome, the applicant herein will be entitled to seek a refund of his EMD in accordance with law. In the event, he wishes to withdraw himself from the bid process. 8. This IA is accordingly disposed of.
Arvind Devanathan Bidisha Banerjee Member (Technical) Member (Judicial)
This Order signed on this, the 18th day of October, 2023.
Sayon [Steno]
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free