Miss Lucy
← All judgments

In the matter of Kaushik Global Logistics Limited

National Company Law Tribunal2 August 2023

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Adjudicating Authority may, in the exercise of its power under section 60(5), exclude from the corporate insolvency resolution process period the time consumed by proceedings before it on an application for such exclusion, and may further extend the CIRP period where a resolution plan has been received, the Committee of Creditors has consented to the extension, and granting time is necessary to give effect to the Code's object of resolving the corporate debtor as a going concern rather than sending it into liquidation.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

INTHENATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNALKOLKATABENCH (Court-II)KOLKATAIA(IBC)/938(KB)2023inCP(IB)/1180(KB)2020Under section 60(5)of theInsolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016In thematter of:StateBank ofIndia ….FinancialCreditorVersusKaushik Global Logistics Limited(U51109WB2000PTC091319) ....Corporate DebtorAndIn thematter of:Mr. Ram Ratan Modi,ResolutionProfessional of Kaushik Global Logistics Limited…ApplicantOrderreserved on:15/05/2023Orderpronounced on:02/08/2023Coram:Smt. BidishaBanerjee : Member (Judicial)ShriBalrajJoshi : Member (Technical)Appearances (through hybrid mode):For RP : Mr. SiddhanthMakkar Adv.For members of suspended : Mr. D. N. Sharma, Adv.Board ofDirectors of Corporate Mr. Abhishek Jain, Adv.DebtorINTHENATIONALCOMPANYLAWTRIBUNALKOLKATABENCH(CourtII)IA(IBC)/938(KB)2023inCP(IB)/1180(KB)2020

OR DE R Per:Balraj Joshi, Member (Technical) 1. This Adjudicating Authority convened through hybrid mode. 2. This application has been filed u/s. 60(5)) of theInsolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, (in short “IBC”) by the Resolution Professional (in short “RP”) of Kaushik Global Logistics Limited, Corporate Debtor, praying for exclusion of 60 days in total, i.e., 35 days from 17/03/2023 till 21/04/2023 and additional 25 days as requested by the SBI for voting on Resolution Plan of the Corporate Debtor. This application issupported by an affidavit1duly affirmed bytheRP. 3. This Adjudicating Authority, on a petition filed u/s. 7 of the IBC read with Rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 by State Bank of India, Financial Creditor, vide order2 dated 10/06/2022 in CP(IB)/1180(KB)2020, had ordered initiation of CIRP against Kaushik Global Logistics Limited appointing Mr. Ram Ratan Modi as the Interim Resolution Professional (in short “IRP”). 4. In terms of section 15 of the IBC Public Announcement was made in Form A on 12/06/2022 in “Financial Express” (English) and “Aajkaal” (Bengali) inviting claims from creditors of the Corporate Debtor and Committee of Creditors (in short “CoC”) was duly formed on 02/07/2022 with three secured Financial Creditors, namely, (1) State Bank of India, (2) Bank of Baroda and (3) Bank of India. In terms of regulation 17 of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations 2016 IRP has filed report with this Adjudicating Authority intimatingconstitutionof CoC. 5. 1st CoC meeting was held on 11/07/2022. The appointment of applicant as Resolution Professional was not confirmed by the CoC at its first meeting. Subsequently, at the 6th CoC meeting held on 09/11/2022, the CoC has approved 1 Atpages24to26oftheapplication 2AnnexureA-1atpages27to40oftheapplication

INTHENATIONALCOMPANYLAWTRIBUNAL KOLKATABENCH(CourtII) IA(IBC)/938(KB)2023 inCP(IB)/1180(KB)2020 theappointment ofIRP as Resolution Professional (in short “RP”). 6. One of the suspended members of the Board of Directors of the Corporate Debtor had filed an appeal before the Hon’ble NCLAT being Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 744 of 2022. Upon hearing the appeal on 08/07/2022, Hon’ble NCLAT has passed thefollowing orders3: “………….CoC may proceed and receive the Resolution Plan but voting with regard toapproval of theplan will notbe donewithoutleave of theCourt”. However, the aforesaid appeal was dismissed by the Hon’ble NCLAT vide its order4dated 09/01/2023. 7. In terms of regulation 36A of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (in short “Regulations, 2016”) Form G was published on 24/08/2022 in “Financial Express” (English) and “Aajkaal” (Bengali) inviting Expression of Interest (in short “EoI”) from prospective resolution applicants (in short “PRA”). The last date of submission of EoI was on 08/09/2022. In response, the applicant had received three EoIs within the stipulated due date. Upon verification, provisional and final list of PRAs were issued on 18/09/2022 and 03/10/2022 respectively. Accordingly, copy of Information Memorandum, Request for Resolution Plan (in short “RFRP”) and Evaluation Matrix were duly shared with the PRAs for submission of resolution plan. According to Form G published, last date of submission of Resolution Plan was 23/10/2022. One of the PRA, viz., Rishikunj Vincom Private Limited, vide e-mail dated 21/10/2022 had requested for extension of time for submission of resolution plan till 04/11/2022. With the approval of the CoC, having 70.17% voting share, time to submit resolution plan was extended till 04/11/2022 and the same was informed to all the prospective resolution applicants by e-mail dated 25/10/2022. Accordingly, the applicant had received one resolution plan from RishikunjVincom Private Limited on04/11/2022.

3 AnnexureA-2atpages41and42oftheapplication 4 AnnexureA-4atpages44and46oftheapplication

INTHENATIONALCOMPANYLAWTRIBUNAL KOLKATABENCH(CourtII) IA(IBC)/938(KB)2023 inCP(IB)/1180(KB)2020

8. Meanwhile, on 05/11/2022 the applicant had admitted claim of Dhanlaxmi Bank Limited being one of the secured Financial Creditor, whose claim was under verification and accordingly reconstituted the CoC on 05/11/2022 with four Secured Financial Creditor as well as updated the List of Creditors also on 05/11/2022. 9. At the 6th CoC meeting held on 09/11/2022, the CoC after due deliberations on the point of extension of CIRP by 90 days had unanimously approved the agenda for extension of CIRP period by 90 days from 07/12/2022. Accordingly, an application being IA(IBC)/1532(KB)2022 was filed praying for 90 days extension from 07/12/2022. Upon hearing the application, this Adjudicating Authority vide order5 dated 07/12/2022 had allowed the application and granted 90 days extension of CIRP period thereby the 270 days CIRP period would come to an end on07/03/2023. 10. At the 11th CoC meeting6 held on 23/02/2023, the revised resolution plan was put for voting. Also, proposed resolution for exclusion of 66 days from 04/11/2022 to 09/01/2023, during which period no decisions could be taken on the resolution plan in terms of the order of the Hon’ble NCLAT, was placed before the CoC members for approval. Considering the urgency, the RP vide e-mail dated 27/02/2023 requested the CoC members to give consent to file an exclusion application. Copies of e-mails collectively forms Annexure A-67. Accordingly, the CoC accorded their consent for exclusion of 66 days from the CIRP period and an application being IA(IBC)499(KB)2023 was filed with this Adjudicating Authority. This Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 20/03/2023 passed in the aforesaid IA had excluded 66 days from 04/11/2022 to 09/01/2023, thereby the 270days CIRP period would come to an end on12/05/2023. 11. Meanwhile, vide e-mail dated 17/04/2023, one of the members of the CoC, namely, Bank of Baroda informed the applicant pertaining to additional assets of 5 AnnexureA-3atpages43 oftheapplication 6 AnnexureA-5,Minutesof11thCoCmeeting,atpages47to62oftheapplication 7 Atpages63to69oftheapplication

INTHENATIONALCOMPANYLAWTRIBUNAL KOLKATABENCH(CourtII) IA(IBC)/938(KB)2023 inCP(IB)/1180(KB)2020 the Corporate Debtor and the time from 17/03/2023 to 21/04/2023, i.e., 35 days were taken to identify, get the same valued in order to apprise the CoC members and the Resolution Applicant the factual position of the additional assets of the Corporate Debtor. Thereafter, at the 13th CoC meeting held on 24/04/2023, the resolution plan was put for voting before the CoC. One of the members of the CoC, i..e., State Bank of India has requested to extend the voting timeline on Resolution Planby30days. 12. The applicant called the 14th CoC meeting on 06/05/2023 to discuss on further exclusion of timeline from the CIRP period and accordingly following Resolutionswere proposed: “RESOLVED FURTHER THAT the Resolution Professional be and is hereby authorized to file an application under section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with the Hon’ble NCLT, Kolkata Bench praying for exclusion of 60 days from CIRP period on the ground of time taken/utilized officially/required for identification and valuation of addition of assets and extension sought bySBI forvoting onresolution plan.” “RESOLVED FURTHER THAT the Resolution Professional be and is hereby authorized to take all action and incur expenditure necessary to give effect to the above Resolution passed by the Committee. The said expenses shallformpart ofthe CIRP cost.” It was recorded in the Minutes8 of the 14th CoC meeting that during the meeting all the CoC members were present and accorded their consent unanimously for theabove resolutions and thesamewere taken as approved and ratified. 13. We have heard the Ld. Counsel for the RP, perused the application and the documents attached therewith. 14. Vide order dated 07/12/2022 and 20/03/2023, this Adjudicating Authority had already granted an extension of 90 days and exclusion of 66 days periods respectively, thereby the 270 days CIRP period would come to an end on 12/05/2023. However, the Resolution Professional has not been able to complete theentire CIRP process within thesaid 270days period.

8 AnnexureA-7atpages70to73oftheapplication

INTHENATIONALCOMPANYLAWTRIBUNAL KOLKATABENCH(CourtII) IA(IBC)/938(KB)2023 inCP(IB)/1180(KB)2020

15. In terms of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court dated 05/11/2019 in Committee of Creditor of Essar Steel India Limited vs. Satish Kumar Gupta and Others, (2020) 8 SCC 531 (para 127), it was held that if, on the fact of a given case it can be shown to the Adjudicating Authority or the Appellate Authority under the Code that only a short period of time is left for completion of the insolvency process beyond 330 days and it would be in the interest of all stakeholders that the corporate debtor be put back on its feet instead of being sent into liquidation, it may be upon the Adjudicating Authority in such case for to extend thetime. 16. The main objective of the Code is to resolve the Corporate Debtor as “a going concern” by way of a resolution plan and productive resources of economy can be put to best use, whereas liquidation means death of the Corporate Debtor. Liquidation isthe last optionwhen there isnoscope forresolution. 17. Here, in this case, the Resolution Professional has in his hand one prospective resolution applicant, who has submitted its resolution plan and the CoC at its 14th meeting has consented for taking 60 days’ exclusion of time for taking decisions on the Resolution Plan submitted by the PRA. In the above scenario not granting some time to resolve the Corporate Debtor would go against the basic object of theCode,i.e., torevive theCorporate Debtor as a goingconcern. 18. Therefore, we exclude the time within which this IA(IBC)/938(KB)2023 was under judicial consideration from 13/05/2023 to this date, and further grant an enlargement of time of 60 days’ time as prayed for in prayer (a) of the application and also in the interest of the resolution of the Corporate Debtor and therefore CIRP period would come to an end on 30.09.2023. We direct the Resolution Professional to strictly adhere to this time frame and complete the CIRP withinthe given timeas above. 19. IA(IBC)/938(KB)2023 shall stand disposed of in accordance with the above directions.

INTHENATIONALCOMPANYLAWTRIBUNAL KOLKATABENCH(CourtII) IA(IBC)/938(KB)2023 inCP(IB)/1180(KB)2020

20. List theMain C.P.on04/09/2023 forfurther consideration. 21. The Registry is directed to send e-mail copies of the order forthwith to all the parties and their Ld.Counsel for information andfor taking necessary steps. 22. Certified Copy of this order may be issued, if applied for, upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

BalrajJoshi Bidisha Banerjee Member (Technical) Member (Judicial)

Signed onthis,the2ndday of August, 2023.

hb.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free