Miss Lucy
← All judgments

In the matter of Katyayni Natural Resources Limited

National Company Law Tribunal6 May 2026

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

A lien or attachment over the assets of a corporate debtor, created by a statutory authority during the subsistence of the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, cannot continue, and the Tribunal may direct its removal so that the assets are made available to the Resolution Professional for payment of CIRP costs. Where the Corporate Debtor's fixed deposit has no lien or attachment subsisting upon it, the bank holding the deposit may be directed to release the amount to the designated CIRP account for utilisation towards CIRP costs.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, COURT-I KOLKATA I.A. (IBC) No. 380/KB/2026 IN C.P. (IB) No. 349/KB/2022 An Application under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 IN THE MATTER OF: M/s. Gokul Sai Udyog LLP …Financial Creditor Versus Katyayni Naturals Resources Limited …Corporate Debtor And IN THE MATTER OF: Mr. Sandip Mitra, Resolution Professional of Katyayni Naturals Resources Limited …Resolution Professional/Applicant Versus 1. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Department of Income Tax, having office at 6th floor, C.R. Building, Birchand Patel Marg, Central Circle-3, Patna- 800001, Bihar And 2. Canara Bank, Pataliputra Colony Branch, having office at 18A, Pataliputra Colony, Patna 800013, Bihar …Respondents

Date of Pronouncement: 06.05.2026 CORAM: Smt. Bidisha Banerjee, Hon’ble Member (Judicial) Cmde Siddharth Mishra, Hon’ble Member (Technical) APPEARANCE: For the Resolution Professional: Mr. Shaunak Mitra, Adv. Mr. Avik Chaudhuri, Adv. Ms. Shruti Majumdar, Adv. Mr. Sandip Mitra, CS (RP in Person)

DIVISION BENCH, COURT-I KOLKATA I.A. (IBC) No. 380/KB/2026 IN C.P. (IB) No. 349/KB/2022 For Canara Bank: Ms. Aparajita Rao, Adv. Ms. Nabanita Dutta, Adv.

ORDER Per: Smt. Bidisha Banerjee, Member (Judicial): 1. The Court convened through hybrid mode.

2. The learned counsels for the parties were heard at length.

3. The instant Application being I.A. (IBC) No. 380/KB/2026 has been filed by Mr. Sandip Mitra, the Resolution Professional of Katyayni Naturals Resources (hereinafter referred to as the RP), seeking the following reliefs: a. An order be passed directing Respondent No. 1 to remove the lien created on 05.03.2023 on the Fixed Deposit Accounts of the Corporate Debtor being Account No. 140049886655, Account No. 2518401012508 and Account No. 5877401000339, and/or any other account of the Corporate Debtor, so that the amounts lying therein may be utilised towards payment of CIRP costs; b. An order be passed directing Respondent No. 2 to release the amounts lying in any and/or all Fixed Deposit Accounts of the Corporate Debtor to the designated CIRP account of the Corporate Debtor, so that the same may be utilised towards payment of the CIRP costs; c. An order be passed directing Respondent No. 2 to immediately release the amount lying in Fixed Deposit Account No. 130018731556 of the Corporate Debtor to the designated CIRP account of the Corporate Debtor in the absence of any lien created by Respondent No. 1 on the said Fixed Deposit Account, so that the same may be utilised towards payment of the CIRP costs;

DIVISION BENCH, COURT-I KOLKATA I.A. (IBC) No. 380/KB/2026 IN C.P. (IB) No. 349/KB/2022 d. Pass such further or other orders/directions as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

4. The RP, by way of this Application has depicted the timelines as follows:

DATE PARTICULARS 22.05.2025 CIRP initiated against M/s. Katyayni Natural Resources Limited by Hon'ble NCLT, Kolkata Bench and Mr. Sandip Mitra appointed as IRP 27.05.2025 Public Announcement in Form A issued by the Applicant inviting claims from creditors 18.06.2025 Respondent No. 1 submitted its claim in Form B before the Applicant, which was admitted in full, making Respondent No. 1 a member of the Committee of Creditors 14.07.2025 Applicant filed an Application under Section 19(2) against the Suspended Board of Directors due to their non-cooperation in providing necessary information and documents. November- Applicant examined bank statements of the December 2025 Corporate Debtor and traced the Fixed Deposit to Canara Bank, Pataliputra Colony Branch, A/c No. 2518214000003. 12.12.2025 Applicant wrote to Canara Bank seeking confirmation, details and transfer of the Fixed Deposit to the CIRP account. 16.12.2025- Reminder emails sent by the Applicant seeking 14.01.2026 urgent cooperation from the Respondent but no response received.

DIVISION BENCH, COURT-I KOLKATA I.A. (IBC) No. 380/KB/2026 IN C.P. (IB) No. 349/KB/2022 22.01.2026 IA 151 of 2026 filed seeking appropriate orders against Respondent No. 2 herein. 26.02.2026 During the hearing in I.A. No. 151 of 2026, Respondent No. 2 admitted that Fixed Deposits of the Corporate Debtor were maintained with the Bank but stated that amounts could not be released due to lien created by Respondent No. 1. 26.02.2026- Emails issued by the Applicant to Respondent No. 07.03.2026 2 seeking details of the Fixed Deposit Accounts. 02.03.2026 Respondent No. 2 provided details of four Fixed Deposit Accounts belonging to the Corporate Debtor. 09.03.2026 During the hearing of I.A. No. 151 of 2026, Respondent No. 2 submitted that the amounts could not be released due to lien created by Respondent No. 1 but failed to produce any supporting document before the Tribunal. After the conclusion of the hearing, Respondent No. 2 shared via email the order of attachment dated 05.08.2023 created by Respondent No. 1 on certain Fixed Deposit Accounts of the Corporate Debtor. 13.03.2026 The present Application being filed seeking appropriate directions from this Hon'ble Tribunal to direct Respondent No. 1 to remove the lien created on the Fixed Deposit Accounts of the Corporate Debtor, and directing Respondent No. 2 to release the amounts lying in the said Fixed Deposit Accounts to the designated CIRP account of the Corporate Debtor, so that the same may be utilised towards payment of the CIRP costs and expenses.

DIVISION BENCH, COURT-I KOLKATA I.A. (IBC) No. 380/KB/2026 IN C.P. (IB) No. 349/KB/2022

5. Learned Counsel for the RP would submit as under: 5.1 Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (hereinafter referred to as “CIRP”) was initiated against the Corporate Debtor, Katyayni Naturals Resources Limited vide order dated 22.05.2025.

5.2 During the course of CIRP and while examining the financial records of the Corporate Debtor, the Applicant discovered the existence of Fixed Deposit Accounts belonging to the Corporate Debtor maintained with Respondent No. 2. Such Fixed Deposit constitutes asset of the Corporate Debtor and are required to be under the control and custody of the Resolution Professional in terms of Section 18 of the Code.

5.3 Since, despite repeated communications, the Respondent No. 2 failed to provide the requisite information, the Applicant was constrained to file I.A. No. 151 of 2026 seeking disclosure of details of the Fixed Deposits and release of the amounts to the CIRP account.

5.4 Durin the hearing of the said application 26.02.2026, Respondent No. 2 admitted the existence of Fixed Deposit Accounts of the Corporate Debtor but contended that the amounts lying therein could not be released due to a lien allegedly created by Respondent No. 1 on certain Fixed Deposit Accounts.

5.5 The Applicant RP came to know that Respondent No. 1 has created a lien on three Fixed Deposit Accounts of the Corporate Debtor, namely Account No. 140049886655, Account No. 2518401012508 and Account No. 5877401000339.

DIVISION BENCH, COURT-I KOLKATA I.A. (IBC) No. 380/KB/2026 IN C.P. (IB) No. 349/KB/2022 5.6 The RP contends that the continuation of such lien during the subsistence of the moratorium imposed under Section 14 of the IBC, 2016 is impermissible and contrary to the scheme and object of the Code. Further, in view of the overriding effect of Section 238 of the Code, the provisions of the Code prevails over any inconsistent action taken by any authority or creditor.

5.7 It is submitted that one Fixed Deposit Account bearing Account No. 130018731556 does not have any lien or attachment created upon it. An amount of Rs. 81,86,172/- is presently lying in the said account. It is an asset of the Corporate Debtor and ought to be made available for the conduct of CIRP.

5.8 That the Respondent No. 2 has stated that the release of the amounts from the Fixed Deposit Accounts can only be effected upon obtaining appropriate orders from this Hon’ble Tribunal.

6. In support of his contention, the learned counsel for the Applicant would rely upon the following decisions: i. Ram Ratan Modi (RP) v. ICICI Bank, Darjeeling Branch, IA No. 1477/KB/2020 in CP (IB) No. 184/KB/2018, order dated 19.05.2021 (NCLT, Kolkata)- That upon commencement of CIRP, the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 override all other laws, and a moratorium prohibits any attachment or lien over the assets of the Corporate Debtor. Accordingly, directions issued by statutory authorities to freeze bank accounts cannot be sustained, particularly when the claims have been duly admitted in the CIRP. ii. In Gajesh Labhchand Jain v Axis Bank Limited & Ors., IA No. 616/2023 in CP (IB) No. 923/MB-IV/2020, order dated 18.05.2023 (NCLT Mumbai)- The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, allowed the application filed by the Liquidator of Talwalkars Healthclub

DIVISION BENCH, COURT-I KOLKATA I.A. (IBC) No. 380/KB/2026 IN C.P. (IB) No. 349/KB/2022 Limited and directed Axis Bank to defreeze all bank accounts of the Corporate Debtor that had been attached by the EOW, Income Tax, and GST authorities. The Tribunal held that such attachment during the subsistence of moratorium and liquidation is impermissible under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, especially when the concerned authorities had already submitted their claims before the Liquidator. iii. Mr. Hemant Mehta v. Commissioner of State Tax, Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 238 of 2022- The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal held that once Corporate Debtor is undergoing CIRP or liquidation, statutory authorities cannot continue attachment or freezing of its bank accounts for recovery of dues. The Tribunal ruled that such actions are inconsistent with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as all claims must be submitted before and dealt with the Resolution Professional or Liquidator in accordance with the IBC waterfall mechanism, and accordingly directed de-freezing of the bank accounts to enable proper conduct of insolvency proceedings.

7. The details of account are as under: Account No. Date of Principal Maturity Value Maturity Amount (Rs.) (Rs.) 130018731556 19-04-2026 81,86,172 82,22,953.70 140049886655 23-06-2026 6,88,102 7,17,073.28 2518401012508 07-05-2029 18,33,162 20,52,242.82 5877401000339 02-03-2030 16,20,356 17,20,294.00 Total 1,23,27,792 1,27,12,563.80

8. The facts are noted, decisions are considered. There is no quarrel with the proposition that lien over assets of the Corporate Debtor cannot continue during moratorium.

DIVISION BENCH, COURT-I KOLKATA I.A. (IBC) No. 380/KB/2026 IN C.P. (IB) No. 349/KB/2022 9. In the aforesaid backdrop, the following directions are issued: a. The Respondent No. 1 shall remove the lien created on 05.03.2023 on the Fixed Deposit Accounts of the Corporate Debtor being Account No. 140049886655, Account no. 2518401012508, and Account No. 5877401000339, and/or any other accounts of the Corporate Debtor immediately within 7 days of uploading this order, failing which costs would be imposed. b. Once lien is removed, the Respondent No. 2 shall release the amounts lying in any and/or all Fixed Deposit Accounts of the Corporate Debtor to the designated CIRP account of the Corporate Debtor for its utilisation towards payment of CIRP costs, etc. c. The Respondent No. 2 shall however, immediately release the amount lying in Fixed Deposit Account No. 130018731556 of the Corporate Debtor to the designated CIRP account of the Corporate Debtor in the absence of any lien created by Respondent No. 1 on the said Fixed Deposit Account, may be utilized towards payment of the CIRP costs.

10. Accordingly, I.A. (IBC) No. 380/KB/2026 is allowed and disposed of with the above directions.

11. The Registry is directed to send e-mail copies of the order forthwith to all the parties and their Ld. Counsel for information and for taking necessary steps.

DIVISION BENCH, COURT-I KOLKATA I.A. (IBC) No. 380/KB/2026 IN C.P. (IB) No. 349/KB/2022 12. Certified Copy of this order may be issued, if applied for, upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

Cmde Siddharth Mishra Smt. Bidisha Banerjee Member (Technical) Member (Judicial) This Order is signed on 6th Day of May 2026. Anubhuti S. (LRA)

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free