Miss Lucy
← All judgments

In the matter of Indian Bank vs. Manoj G. Trodkar,

National Company Law Tribunal25 November 2024

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Tribunal's order rests on the following procedural principles under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 as applied to this application: where a financial creditor's application under Section 95 is filed with a demand notice shown to have been delivered to the personal guarantor's last known correct address, the statutory requirement under Section 95 is treated as complete, and the Tribunal may proceed to appoint a Resolution Professional to examine the application and report under Section 99(1). On the same footing, the interim moratorium under Section 96(1)(a) commences on the date of filing of the application and operates until the date of admission, during which any pending legal action in respect of a debt stands stayed and creditors are restrained from initiating fresh legal action or proceedings in respect of that debt.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNALCOURT ROOM NO. 1,MUMBAI BENCHItem No. 35C.P. (IB)/560(MB)2024CORAM:SH. PRABHAT KUMAR JUSTICE VIRENDRASINGH BISHT (Retd.)HON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL) HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL)ORDER SHEET OF THE HEARING ON 25.11.2024NAME OF THE PARTIES: INDIAN BANK V/s MANOJ G TIRODKARSection 95(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016ORDERC.P. (IB)/560(MB)2024

1) Ld. Counsel, Tejasvi Dalvi appeared for the Financial Creditor and Ld. Counsel, Suyash Gadre a/w Abhishek Thoke appeared for the Personal Guarantor. 2) This is a Company Petition filed by Indian Bank (“the Financial Creditor”), under Section 95 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) read with Rule 7(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019 seeking to initiate Personal Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Mr. Manoj G Tirodkar, the Personal Guarantor. 3) Ld. Counsel for the Financial Creditor invited the attention of this bench to the deed of guarantee dated 20.03.2012 executed by the Personal Guarantor and the copy of Demand Notice dated 10.01.2024 which was successfully delivered upon the Personal Guarantor on 12.01.2024 on their last known correct address though Indian Post and the requirement u/s 95 of the Code is complete. --2--

--2-- 4) This bench appoints Ms. Neelima Anil Bhate, having registration number IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P01122/2018-19/11900, Email: neelima_bhate@yahoo.com; Mob: 9822076964 as the Resolution Professional (RP) in the matter. The fee payable to Resolution Professional (RP) shall be in accordance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) Regulations/Circulars/ Directions issued in this regard. 5) The Resolution Professional shall examine the Application within 10 days from the date of his appointment and submit its report to the Adjudicating Authority recommending for approval or rejection of the Application as referred under section 99(1) of the Code. The RP is also directed to serve the copy of report on both the sides Financial Creditor as well as the Personal Guarantor and file proof of service of report. 6) This Bench also directs for an advance payment of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakh only) to be paid by the Financial Creditor to the Resolution Professional (RP) immediately to initiate the process which shall be adjusted towards the fee and expenses payable to the Resolution Professional (RP). 7) The interim-moratorium under Section 96(1) (a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has commenced on the date of filing of this application by the Financial Creditor and will cease to have effect on the date of admission. 8) During such interim-moratorium period – a. any legal action or proceeding pending in respect of any debt shall be deemed to have been stayed; and b. the creditors of the debtor shall not initiate any legal action or proceedings in respect of any debt.

Sd/- Sd/- PRABHAT KUMAR JUSTICE VIRENDRASINGH BISHT MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL) ANKIT

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free