Miss Lucy
← All judgments

In the matter of Grades Entertainments Pvt. Ltd.

National Company Law Tribunal2 May 2023

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Tribunal permits withdrawal of a Section 9 insolvency petition under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, read with Regulation 30A of the CIRP Regulations, 2016, where the Committee of Creditors has approved the withdrawal by a vote of more than 90% of the voting share, the approval being conditional on the applicant furnishing Form FA and the Resolution Professional being authorised to file the withdrawal application.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHICOURT-IIIItem No.309IA-1348/2022 IA-1307/2023InIB-953(ND)/2020IN THE MATTER OF:Nimit Soni …. APPLICANT/PETITIONERVs.Grades Entertainments Pvt. Ltd. …. RESPONDENTSECTIONU/s 9 IBC code 2016 Order delivered on 02.05.2023CORAM:SHRI BACHU VENKAT BALARAM DAS, HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL)SHRI ATUL CHATURVEDI HON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL)PRESENT:For the RP : Mr. Gautam Singhal, Mr. Rajat Chaudhary,Advocates for RPFor the Respondent :ORDERIA-1307/2023:-

This application has been filed by the Resolution Professional under Section 12A of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Regulation 30A of CIRP Regulations, 2016. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel that in the 4th meeting of COC held on 11.07.2022, the proposal of withdrawal of CIRP in accordance with Regulation 30A of CIRP Regulations read with Section 12A of the Code was placed before the Committee of Creditors for e-voting.

The Resolution passed in the said COC meeting is extracted below:

Mamta 02.05.2023 “RESOLVED THAT subject to furnishing of Form FA by Mr. Nimit Soni, approval of the committee of creditors of Grades Entertainments Private Limited be and is hereby accorded for withdrawal of corporate insolvency resolution process in respect of Grades Entertainments Private Limited in accordance with Section 12 A of the Code read with Regulation 304 of CIRP Regulations, 2016."

"FURTHER RESOLVED that Mr. Nitish Kumar Chugh, resolution professional be and is hereby authorised to file necessary application for withdrawal and to do all other necessary and incidental things." Further, Form FA was also circulated to all CoC members. The matter was put for e-voting. The e-voting result result is as under:

S. Name of Voting Yes% No Abstained Total% No. COC Share % % Members % 1. Nimit Soni, 87.68 87.68% - - 87.68 Rajan Soni, % & Vijay Soni (Paras Art Studio 2. Sidharth 12.32 12.32% - - 12.32 Rathi (on % % Que Exhibitions & conferences ) Total 100.0 100.00% - - 100.00 0% %

Mamta 02.05.2023

The Ld. Counsel further submitted that in terms of Section 12A the resolution is required to be approved by 90% of voting share of CoC Member and in the present case the Resolution was passed by 100% voting share in favour of proposal under Section 12A of the Code.

Heard the submissions made by Ld. Counsel and perused the records. We permit the Applicant to withdraw the present petition. IB-953(ND)/2020 stands dismissed as withdrawn.

IA allowed. IA-1348/2022:- List the matter on 01.06.2023.

Sd/- Sd/- (ATUL CHATURVEDI) (BACHU VENKAT BALARAM DAS) MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

Mamta 02.05.2023

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free