Miss Lucy
← All judgments

In the matter of GENERAL COMPOSITES PRIVATE LIMITED

National Company Law Tribunal4 June 2026

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Tribunal may replace a liquidator under regulation 31A(11) of the Liquidation Process Regulations on an application by the Stakeholders' Consultation Committee, where the committee has approved the change by a substantial majority of voting share and the proposed liquidator has given prior written consent together with a valid IBBI registration and authorisation for assignment. On such a replacement, the outgoing liquidator is to hand over the process records to the incoming liquidator and stands discharged upon doing so, while the incoming liquidator settles the outgoing liquidator's dues subject to availability of funds in the corporate debtor and the approvals required under the liquidation process regulations.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNALCOURT ROOM NO. 1MUMBAI BENCHItem No. 7IA(I.B.C)/2205( MB)2026 IN C.P. (IB)/703(MB)2019CORAM:SH. PRABHAT KUMAR SH. SUSHIL MAHADEORAO KOCHEYHON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL) HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL)ORDER SHEET OF THE HEARING ON 04.06.2026NAME OF THE PARTIES: CORPORATION BANK VS GENERALCOMPOSITE PVT LTDSection 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016ORDERIA (I.B.C)/2205(MB)2026

1. Adv. Navin Arora for the Applicant is present. 2. This Application has been filed by Stakeholders' Consultation Committee (SCC) of General Composite Private Limited, through its authorized member, Union Bank of India, through its Authorized Signatory Sidhartha M. Mhade under regulation 31A (11) of Liquidation Regulation 2016 r/w Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016 seeking following reliefs: a. Allow the present Application and pass an order replacing the existing Liquidator Mr. Devang P. Sampat with the proposed new liquidator- Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jindal. b. Pass such other order(s) as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case. 3. The CIRP of the Corporate Debtor was initiated by the NCLT vide order dated 03.09.2019 and Mr. Ankur Kumar Shrivastav, having Registration

No. IBBI/IPA-002/IPNOOl13/2017-18/ 10283 as the Interim Resolution Professional. 4. Thereafter, liquidation was commenced against the Corporate Debtor vide order dated 05.03.2024 and Mr. Devang P. Sampat having IP having Registration No. IBBI/IPA- 001/IP-P00224/2017-2018/10423 was appointed as the Liquidator by the NCLT. 5. It is stated that, in the 20th meeting of the SCC held on 27.03.2026, an agenda for change of the Liquidator was discussed and the same was approved by the SCC by 91.97% of the total voting share. The reason for change of the Liquidator is that so far 8 auctions have been conducted, however, the Liquidator has not been able to liquidate the properties of the Corporate Debtor. 6. It is case of the SCC members that the Liquidator has not demonstrated adequate efforts towards sale of assets, including consistent marketing initiatives over a timebound approach to completion of the sale process, and the continued delay has adversely impacted the value of the assets and resulted in a cost which could have been avoided. 7. It is further submitted that the Applicant has been authorized to file an application before the NCLT for the appointment of proposed new Liquidator, Rakesh Kumar Jindal, in place of the existing Liquidator. 8. The Applicant has obtained the prior written consent of the proposed new Liquidator along with IBBI Registration certificate and a valid authorization for Assignment. 9. Having considered the submissions and material on record, we hereby confirm the appointment of Rakesh Kumar Jindal as liquidator to carry on liquidation process further, and the existing liquidator Mr. Devang P. Sampat is directed to handover the process records to the incoming liquidator without any further delay, and he shall stand discharged upon handing over the records. Needless to say, the incoming liquidator shall settle the dues owed to the outgoing liquidator, subject to availability of funds with the corporate debtor and approval in relation to such dues as required under the liquidation process regulations, forthwith. The applicant shall immediately inform the incoming liquidator to take charge of the process without any further delay. 10. In terms of above, the IA (I.B.C)/2205(MB)2026 is allowed and disposed of.

Sd/- Sd/- PRABHAT KUMAR SUSHIL MAHADEORAO KOCHEY MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL) Shubham Bide

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free