In the matter of Erwin India Private Limited

SL. No.8 NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH COURT HALL NO: II Hearing Through: VC and Physical (Hybrid) Mode CORAM: SHRI. RAJEEV BHARDWAJ – HON’BLE MEMBER (J) CORAM: SHRI. SANJAY PURI - HON’BLE MEMBER (T) ATTENDANCE-CUM-ORDER SHEET OF THE HEARING OF NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD BENCH, HELD ON 22.04.2025 at 10:30 AM TRANSFER PETITION NO. COMPANY PETITION/APPLICATION NO. Company Petition (IB) No.182/59/HDB/2024 Erwin India Pvt Ltd NAME OF THE COMPANY NAME OF THE PETITIONER(S) Mr. Shashikant Shravan Dhamne NAME OF THE RESPONDENT(S) Registrar of Companies, Telangana UNDER SECTION 59 OF IBC

ORDER Orders pronounced, recorded vide separate sheets. In the result, this dissolution Petition is allowed.

Sd/- Sd/- MEMBER (T) MEMBER (J)

Apoorva

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH - II

CP(IB) No.182/59/HDB/2024 u/s 59(7) of IBC, 2016 r/w Regulation 38(3) of IBBI (Voluntary Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2017

In the matter of M/S. ERWIN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (In Voluntary Liquidation) Filed by: Mr Shashikant Shravan Dhamne, Liquidator of M/s Erwin India Private Limited, 10, Shreeban, Opp. Police Ground, F.C. Road, Shivajinagar, Pune – 411 016. .... Petitioner

Date of Order : 22.04.2025 Coram: Sri Rajeev Bhardwaj, Hon’ble Member (Judicial) Sri Sanjay Puri, Hon’ble Member (Technical)

Counsel present: Mr Radha Krishna, Ld Counsel for the Petitioner Mr Prem Prakash, Asst Director from RoC office

Per : Bench

1. This Company Petition under Section 59(7) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is filed by the Liquidator of the Corporate Person M/S. ERWIN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, seeking dissolution of the Company under voluntary liquidation process.

NCLT, HYDERABAD BENCH-II CP(IB) No.182/59/HDB/2024 Date of Order : 22.04.2025

Details of the Company 2. M/s Erwin India Private Limited, the Corporate Person was incorporated on 31.05.2016 under the Companies Act, to carry out the business of providing outsourcing services in all IT related processes for various industries across the world.

3. It is submitted that due to cogent reasons, the Corporate Person was decided to liquidate the Company voluntarily by initiating the Voluntary Liquidation process under IBC 2016, and the Board of Directors approved1 the same on 27.02.2024.

4. The Directors and the Shareholders of the Company as on commencement of Voluntary Liquidation was as under:

S No Name Designation No. of % of holding shares 1 Sujata Prasad Agashe Director -- -- 2 Dilip George Director -- -- 3 Erwin Technologies Shareholder 2,90,699 99.99 Pte. Ltd, Singapore 4 Erwin Tech Asia Pte. Shareholder 1 0.01 Ltd, Singapore Total : 2,90,700 100

5. That, the Members of the Corporate Person in their Extra-ordinary General Meeting (EGM) held on 06.03.2024 passed a Special Resolution2 to liquidate the Company voluntarily, and appointed Mr Shashikant Shravan Dhamne, to act as the Liquidator.

6. That in compliance with the Code, the Corporate Person intimated about the commencement of Voluntary Liquidation to the Registrar of Companies (RoC)3, IBBI4, Income Tax Authority and also to the relevant Statutory Authorities5.

1 Page 67 of the Application 2 Pages 132 & 194 of the Application 3 Pages 195 to 201 of the Application 4 Pages 206 to 208 of the Application 5 Page 209 to 223 of the Application

NCLT, HYDERABAD BENCH-II CP(IB) No.182/59/HDB/2024 Date of Order : 22.04.2025

7. It is asserted that, the Voluntary Liquidation in respect of the Corporate Person was commenced from 06.03.2024, and there were no creditors for the Corporate Person.

8. The Liquidator made Public Announcement6 in Form-A on 09.03.2024 in daily newspapers, seeking stakeholders to submit their claims if any within 30 days from the date of commencement of liquidation. The said Public Announcement was also displayed on the website of IBBI.

9. It is asserted that, EPFO Regional Office, Madhapur, Hyderabad submitted its claim for the damages, interest thereon and the administrative charges. The said claim was already paid by the Corporate Person through various challans prior to the LCD, and the same was communicated to EPFO Authorities. No further communication was received from EPFO, and an application for closure of PF registration was also submitted with EPFO Regional office on 21.05.2024.

10. It is further submitted that, the claim submitted by the Income Tax Department for interest payment for AY 2019-2020 for Rs 810, was already paid by the Corporate Person on 30.03.2024. However, the claim of Rs 2,37,165 against the demand and interest payment for AY 2021-2022 was incorrect, and a rectification return was filed by the Corporate Person on 26.02.2024 i.e. prior to the LCD. Subsequently, the Income Tax Department processed the rectified return on 21.03.2024 dropping this demand.

11. That the Liquidator prepared the Preliminary Report,7 List of Stakeholders,8 Status Report9 consisting of Interim Liquidation Audited accounts showing receipts and payments pertaining to the liquidation, and also submitted to IBBI.

6 Page 224 & 226 of the Application 7 Pages 227 to 231 of the Application 8 Pages 232 to 235 of the Application 9 Pages 236 to 242 of the Application

NCLT, HYDERABAD BENCH-II CP(IB) No.182/59/HDB/2024 Date of Order : 22.04.2025

12. That on completion of the voluntary liquidation process, the Bank Account used for liquidation process, was closed10 with effect from 25.06.2024.

13. It is asserted that on liquidation commencement date, there were no fixed assets (except bank balance) in the Company. Accordingly, there was no requirement of any disposal of the fixed assets during the liquidation process.

14. That as there were no funds available in the liquidation bank account post incurring the liquidation costs, no distribution was made to the shareholders during the liquidation process.

15. That the Final Report11 was sent to RoC and to the IBBI. Further asserted that on completion of the liquidation, the Liquidator has duly prepared Compliance Certificate in Form H.12

16. It is submitted that, since the affairs of the Corporate Person has been completely wound up and its assets have been completely liquidated, praying this Tribunal through this Petition, to pass an order that the Corporate Person under Liquidation shall stand dissolved with effect from the date of such order by this Tribunal.

RoC Report and Compliance Memo filed by Liquidator 17. The RoC filed its Report on 05.03.2025 wherein submitted that the status of the Company as on today as per MCA record is Active Compliant and “Under Liquidation”, and there are no open charges as per MCA21. The present company is subsidiary of company incorporated outside India.

It is stated that, appropriate orders may be passed by this Tribunal on merits based on the Final Report submitted by the Liquidator, subject to clarifications that shall be brought before this Tribunal on the points mentioned under S No.13 as special feature, if any bearing on the 10 Pages 244 to 256 of the Application 11 Pages 257 to 265 of the Application 12 Pages 271 to 277 of the Application

NCLT, HYDERABAD BENCH-II CP(IB) No.182/59/HDB/2024 Date of Order : 22.04.2025 application, including the clarifications to be issued by the Liquidator under intimation to the office of RoC, Hyderabad.

It is thus submitted that, necessary Orders may be issued to the effect that upon dissolution of the Company, records of the Company be handed over by the Liquidator to IBBI as per IBBI (Voluntary Liquidation Process) Regulations 2017 and other applicable provisions of IBC 2016 and accordingly be directed to file confirmation to this Tribunal.

RoC’s observations under S.No.13 of its report, and the Compliance Memo dated 27.03.2025 filed by the Liquidator, are summarized as below: S.No. Observations of RoC Compliance Memo filed by the Petitioner 13 Special feature, if any, having bearing on the application:- It is observed that both of the The Company had duly shareholders are foreign body reported the allotment of corporates. equity shares to its shareholders resident outside In view of the above, the Indian with the Reserve Bank Liquidator shall include a of India and have obtained statement to the Tribunal on the acknowledgment from Reserve compliance of FEMA Guidelines Bank of India. Copy of the said on the investments made in the acknowledgement is enclosed Indian Company by foreign body as Annexure A. It is further corporates. submitted that there were no surplus funds available post incurring the liquidation costs hence no distribution was made to the shareholders during the liquidation process. Accordingly, compliance with FEMA does not apply. It shall be also clarified by the With respect to Section 89 of Liquidator about any beneficial the Companies Act, Erwin interest or rights that these India Private Limited (Erwin foreign body corporates have in India) is held by Erwin the Indian Corporates in Technologies Pte. Ltd. (Erwin accordance with Sections 89 or 90 Technologies) and Erwin Tech of the Companies Act, 2013. Asia Pte. Ltd. (Erwin Tech), Therefore, the Liquidator shall which hold 290,669 equity clarify the position of the shares and 1 equity share, Applicant Company for respectively. Both Erwin

NCLT, HYDERABAD BENCH-II CP(IB) No.182/59/HDB/2024 Date of Order : 22.04.2025 mandatory compliance of Sections Technologies and Erwin Tech 89 or 90 of the Companies Act, hold these shares in their own 2013 as on the date of application capacity as legal and beneficial filed before the Tribunal owners. There is no separate foreign body corporate or individual holding any underlying beneficial interest in the equity shares of Erwin India that would necessitate compliance with Section 89. Similarly, Section 90 of the Companies Act is not applicable to Erwin India. Erwin India is ultimately held by Odyssey Investment Holdings, LLC (Odyssey Investment), as reflected in the group structure attached as Annexure B. Under the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018, disclosure obligations under Section 90 apply only when an individual, directly or indirectly, holds at least 10% of shares, voting rights, or exercises significant influence or control. No individual holds the prescribed threshold of beneficial interest or exercises significant control over Odyssey Investment that would trigger compliance requirements under Section 90. Thus, as on the date of the application filed before the NCLT, the provisions of Section 89 and Section 90 of the Companies Act were not applicable to Erwin India.

The Decision 18. We have heard, and perused the record. We are satisfied that the liquidation process is completed as per the procedure laid down under IBC 2016, and we find that the affairs of the Corporate Person have been NCLT, HYDERABAD BENCH-II CP(IB) No.182/59/HDB/2024 Date of Order : 22.04.2025 completely wound up. The Company has no assets, as such, had voluntarily liquidated itself so as to get dissolved.

19. As a sequel to the above, by exercising the powers conferred on the Adjudicating Authority under Section 59 of the Code, we hereby allow the Company Petition with the following directions:

a. The Corporate Person M/S ERWIN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED is hereby dissolved from the date of this order, and the Liquidator stands relieved.

b. The Registry is directed to forward a copy of this order within a period of 14 days from the date of this order to the Registrar of Companies, Hyderabad, Telangana for making appropriate remarks for the Company on MCA website and Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India.

c. The Liquidator is also directed to forward a copy of this order to all the Statutory Authorities connected with the affairs of the Corporate Person.

d. The Liquidator is further directed to preserve a physical or electronic copy of reports, books of accounts referred to in Regulation 8 and 10 for at least 8 years after the dissolution of the Corporate Person, either with himself or with the information utility. Sd/- Sd/- (SANJAY PURI) (RAJEEV BHARDWAJ) MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

VL