Miss Lucy
← All judgments

In the matter of EMCO LIMITED

National Company Law Tribunal12 August 2026

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Tribunal may approve the replacement of a liquidator under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, read with Regulation 8B of the Liquidation Regulations, where the outgoing liquidator has resigned on taking up other professional employment and the Stakeholders' Consultation Committee has approved the resignation and the proposed successor by a vote carrying the requisite voting share, here 74.23 per cent held by the consenting financial creditors.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNALMUMBAI BENCH COURT IIItem No. 3IA 3486/2026 In C.P.(IB)2849(MB)2018CORAMSHRI ANIL RAJ CHELLAN SHRI ASHISH KALIAHON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL) HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

ORDER SHEET OF HEARING (HYBRID) DATED 12.08.2026 NAME OF THE PARTIES: Jet Roadlines (India) Pvt. Ltd VS EMCO Ltd. Appearance: For Applicant : Adv. Ayush Rajani a/w Adv. Khushboo Rajani i/b AKR Legal For Respondent : None Present IBC Under Section 9 ORDER IA 3486/2026 The present Application is being filed by Mr. Sundaresh Bhat, the Liquidator of EMCO Limited ("Corporate Debtor"), under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("Code") read with Regulation 8B of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 ("Liquidation Regulations"), seeking appointment of Mr. Sutanu Sinha, Insolvency Professional bearing Registration No. IBBI/IPA-003/ IP- N00020/2017- 2018/ 10167, as the incoming Liquidator in his place. 2. The Applicant submits that during the meeting of the Stakeholders' Consultation Committee ("SCC") held on 29 July 2026, the Applicant apprised the members of his decision to take up professional employment, due to which he would be unable to continue as the Liquidator of the Corporate Debtor. Accordingly, the Applicant sought the SCC's consent for his replacement as Liquidator and the appointment of a new Liquidator in accordance with law. Pursuant to the deliberations, the members of the SCC present at the meeting approved the Applicant's resignation as Liquidator of the Corporate Debtor and, by voice vote and show of hands, voted to replace the Applicant. Bank of Baroda, Union Bank of India, State Bank of India, Bank of India and Kotak Mahindra Bank, collectively carrying 74 .23% of the voting share of the SCC, voted in favour of replacing the Applicant with Mr. Sutanu Sinha, as the Liquidator of the Corporate Debtor. 3. Having considered the submissions made by the Counsel for the Applicant and facts mentioned in the present Application, we deem it appropriate to approve the appointment of Mr. Sutanu Sinha, Insolvency Professional having registration no. IBBI/IPA-003/ IP-N00020/2017- 2018/ 10167 as Liquidator, in place of Applicant/Mr. Sundaresh Bhat. The outstanding fee, if any, shall be paid forthwith. Accordingly, IA 3486 of 2026 is allowed and disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Sd/- Sd/- ANIL RAJ CHELLAN ASHISH KALIA MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL) Vicky

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free