Miss Lucy
← All judgments

In the matter of Deogiri Infrastructure Private Limited

National Company Law Tribunal5 October 2023

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Adjudicating Authority, in considering an application under Section 33(1) read with Section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, may order liquidation of a corporate debtor where the Committee of Creditors has, by the requisite majority, resolved to liquidate it under Section 33(2); in such a case the Authority's inquiry is confined to whether the resolution was passed in accordance with the Code and the prescribed procedure, and it will not substitute its own view for the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors. The Authority accepts, as settled, that the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors on the liquidation of a corporate debtor is not to be second-guessed by the Adjudicating Authority, and that the Committee's resolutions made with 83.02% voting share, including those approving liquidation, appointing the liquidator and fixing his fee, are to be given effect where they conform to the Code.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL,MUMBAI BENCH COURT IIII.A. 4058 OF 2023Under Section 33(1) read with 33(2) ofInsolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016Filed byMr. Shailesh Bhalchandra Desai(Resolution Professional of DeogiriInfrastructure Pvt. Ltd)Having registered office at: 708, RahejaCentre, 7th Floor, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021…ApplicantIn the matter ofC.P. No. 429 of 2022State Bank of India…Financial CreditorVersusDeogiri Infrastructure Private Limited…Corporate DebtorOrder reserved on: 08.09.2023Order delivered on: 05.10.2023Coram:Hon’ble Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Member (Judicial)Hon’ble Mr. Charanjeet Singh Gulati, Member (Technical)NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCHI.A. 4058 of 2023IN C. P. No. 429/2022Appearance:For the Resolution Professional: Mr. Ayush J Rajani a/w. Ms.Khushboo Shah & Ms. MitaliBhatt, advocatesPer: Hon’ble Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Member (Judicial)

1. This application is filed by the Resolution Professional, of M/s Deogiri Infrastructure Private Limited., (hereinafter referred as Corporate Debtor) seeking liquidation of Corporate Debtor under Section 33(1)(a) read with Section 33(2) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter “IBC”) with consequential prayers like appointment of Liquidator and moratorium during liquidation under section 33(5). The brief facts of the Application are as follows:

2. On an application filed by State Bank of India under section 7 of IBC, the Corporate Debtor was admitted to Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) vide order dated 29.03.2023 and the Applicant was appointed as Interim Resolution Professional ("IRP").

3. In compliance with section 15 of the IBC, the IRP made a Public Announcement dated 05.04.2023 calling for submission of claims till 17.04.2023 in terms of Regulation 6 of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016.

4. Based on the claims received, the Committee of Creditors was constituted. His appointment was confirmed from IRP to RP of NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022

Corporate Debtor during the first meeting of the Committee of Creditors held on 03.05.2023 with 83.02% voting in favour.

5. Members of CoC: (Rs. in Crores) Sl. Name of Creditor Amount Claim Voting (%) No. Claimed Admitted 1. State Bank of India 50.44 50.44 65.23 2. Bank of Baroda 13.82 13.76 17.79 3. Indian Bank 13.13 13.13 16.98 Total 77.39 77.33 100.00

6. A total of four (4) CoC meetings have been held during CIRP period.

7. The Applicant submits that apart from claims from financial creditors he has received claims from operational creditors as existing on the date of filing the present application which are as follows:

Claim of Operational Creditors (Rs.) Sr. Name of Claim Claim Under No. Operational Amount Admitted Verification Creditor 1 Samarth 13,54,974 13,26,000 28,974 Enterprises 2 State Tax 15,44,996 15,44,996 .. Department

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022

3 Designer 10,620 7,080 3,540 Concrete Pvt Ltd 4 V V Peddy 44,64,054 .. .. Construction 5 Nitin S 25,500 25,500 .. Sharma & Associates 6 Abhinav 3,22,834 3,22,834 .. Construction 7 S. K. 3,34,373 3,25,717 8,656 Industrial Corporation 8 Ali Explosive & 18,69,568 4,99,298 13,70,270 Co. 9 Yash 6,77,360 6,77,360 .. Engineers 10 Kalpesh Cable 34,71,747 12,01,045 22,70,702 Industries Pvt Ltd 11 Shree 6,77,333 1,33,472 5,43,861 Marketing & Distribution Services 12 Vishal Cable 12,24,420 5,01,729 7,22,691 Industries Pvt Ltd 13 Lucky 36,164 36,164 .. Electrical & Engg.

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022

14 Bhoopati 8,78,454 .. 8,78,454 Ramsurat Chaudhary 15 Prabhunath 68,638 68,638 Umashankar Vishwakarma 16 Vishwanath 2,26,447 2,26,447 Namdeo Danake 17 Kanti Cables 2,71,965 1,51,656 1,20,307 Total 1,74,59,447 1,01,71,476 72,87,971

8. He has also received claims from the employees. Since these claims were received without proper supporting documents, therefore they are kept under verification, which are as follows:

Sr. Name of Claim Claim Under No. Operational Amount Admitted Verification Creditor 1 Ravindra Kaduba 14,994 _ 14,994 Dahatonde 2 Raosaheb Gunderao 44,688 _ 44,688 Jakapure 3 Prashant R 3,92,963 _ 3,92,963 Deshpande 4 Suresh Manikrao 3,03,695 _ 3,03,695 Kulkarni 5 Ramesh Gunderao 10,436 _ 10,436 Jakapure

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022

6 Prashant 20,775 _ 20,775 Bhagawandas Vaishnav 7 Roshan 10,219 _ 10,219 Komalprakash Khanna Total 7,97,770 - 7,97,770

9. The Applicant submits that during the course of the CIRP, he had appointed two registered valuers each for Plant & Machinery (Alok Kumar Gupta and Kedar Arvind Chikodi) and Security or Financial Assets (Alok Kumar Gupta and Jayeshkumar Parasmal Shah). All the valuers are registered with Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India.

10. The Applicant had issued Invitation for expression of interest ("Eol") on 26.05.2023 in Form G, and the last date for receipt of expression of interest was 15.06.2023.

11. The Applicant submits that during 3rd CoC meeting held on 21.06.2023, he has informed the CoC members that he had received the inquiries from nine (9) parties but did not receive a single Eol from any of the interested parties. Considering the situation of the Corporate Debtor, the CoC members deliberated about filing application for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor. The Applicant also informed the CoC members that the CoC has to decide on the provisions of Regulations 39B, 39C and 39D of CIRP Regulations, 2016 before passing the resolution for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor. The CoC members

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022 requested the Applicant to defer this matter to the next CoC meeting.

12. During the course of the 4th CoC meeting held on 05.08.2023, the Applicant informed the CoC that, none of the interested party came forward with Eol, Pursuant to section 33(1)(a) read with section 33(2) of the Code, the CoC approved the resolution for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor.

13. The Applicant submits that considering the CoC Members approval with 83.02% voting shares, initiation of the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, the Applicant has filed the present Application for Liquidation in terms of the provisions of section 33 of the Code.

14. The Applicant submits that the CoC members have also approved the Resolution put for appointment of the Applicant/ Resolution Professional to act as the Liquidator of the Corporate Debtor with 83.02%. The signed consent dated 29.08.2023 along with the Authorisation for Assignment is annexed to the application.

15. The Applicant prayed that since there are no resolution plans for consideration of the CoC, application is filed in terms of section 33(1) of the Code for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor with consequential reliefs.

16. Heard the submissions of the counsel appearing for the Applicant and perused the material available on record specifically the Minutes of the third and fourth meeting of CoC. In Item No. 5 of third CoC meeting held on 21st June 2023, it is NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022 mentioned that RP observed that there is need of determination of the avoidance transactions subjected to the CD, therefore, he has appointed M/s Amit Ray & Company to conduct Transaction Audit. RP also informed all the CoC members that the Suspended Directors (SD) have not yet provided any books of accounts and tally data and requested the CoC members to provide the bank account statements since 01.04.2013 onwards so as to aid the auditor for conducting the transaction audit. The CoC passed the resolution ratifying the fee payable to Amit Ray & Company with 65.23% votes.

17. Another important agenda, relating to the valuation of Corporate Debtor is noticed in Item No. 6 of third CoC meeting held on 21st June 2023 extract of which is reproduced below:-

Item No.6. – To update on the information received/pending from the suspended Directors (SD)- The RP informed that the suspended directors are yet to provide following information till date. 1. Tally data 2. Books of accounts in in physical form RP informed that the SD has provided the agreement copies of two subcontractors namely Bharat Engineering and Aditya Enterprises. The SD has informed to RP that all the assets mentioned in the below lists are presently kept at Gut No. 1005 at Bidkin, Tal, Paithan, Aurangabad except one i.e., Caterpillar 320C which is located at Shop No.1, KM Stone 46, Near Gavli Tea Stall, Peth Road (NH848) Karanjali, Shivkar,

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022

Nashik- 422211. The SD assured that all these assets will be made available to the Valuer for valuation purposes.

Details of assets & their location Sr. Asset WDV as on Location No. 29.03.2023

1 Stone Crusher 27,28,284.00 It was not in working condition for last five years. It was at site near village Peth, Dist. Nashik. The nearby villagers have stolen many parts and sold it as scrap. Hence at present, the stone crusher needs to be treated as scrap value. 2 Centring Plates 5,58,193.98 They were lying at different sites and stolen by nearby villagers. 3 Tippers Old (6 No.) 5,27,429.32 MH 20 AT 4945 All vehicles are not in working [Rs.87904.88] condition & RTO tax for last five years along with fitness MH 20 AT 3461 certificate is pending. They are [Rs.87904.88] lying at Gut No. 1005 at Bidkin, MH 20 AT 3467 Tq. Paithan, Aurangabad. [Rs.87904.88]

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022

MH 20 AT 3427 [Rs.87904.88] MH 20 AT 3447 [Rs.87904.88] MH 20 AT 3437 [Rs.87904.88]

4 Site Equipment’s centring 4,38,473.31 They were lying at different Plates sites and stolen by nearby villagers. 5 Caterpillar 320D 3,68,500.00 6 Caterpillar 320C 2,57,490.00 All vehicles are not in working condition & RTO tax for last five 7 Bakhoe Loader JCB 77,051.00 years along with fitness certificate is pending. They are 8 Tippers (MH20DE2405) 86,753.00 located at Gut No. 1005 at 9 Tippers (MH20DE1108) 65,262.00 Bidkin, Tq. Paithan, Aurangabad 10 Excavator ZX-110 1,30,517.59

11 Office Equipment’s 38,042.00 12 Electric Installation 54,233.00 These assets were not in good condition, at the time of vacating 13 Computers 85,648.61 the rented office, hence were left there 14 Furniture & Fixtures 3,40,739.00

15 Lab Equipment 95,295.00

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022

16 Vehicles 1,97,427.25 Sold & Cash deposited in account 17 Concrete Mixer 41,710.00 18 Breaker SB 302 39,481.00 At Gut no. 1005, at Bidkin, Dist. Aurangabad 19 Water Tanker 20,567.00

Total 61,51,097.06

The RP pointed out that, as per the above table, the SD has mentioned that the vehicles are sold off and the amount was deposited in the respective bank Account. RP requested the SD to provide the Bank Statements showing the amount credited towards the sale of vehicles.

The Representative of the SBI requested the SD to provide the ownership documents of all the assets. The SD informed that he is not having all the documents with him and thus have provided whatever was available with him to the RP such as RC book and/or invoices of few assets.

Thereafter, the RP discussed about the note received from the SD on the recovery of Security Deposits, where in SD stated that the chances of recovering of Security Deposits are NIL due to various reasons. CoC requested the RP to send email / letter to the relevant parties to get their feedback on the matter.

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022

The RP inquired about the delay in submission of physical books of accounts, to which the SD informed that on account of death of the mother of one of his ex-employees, he was not able to send the same. The SD assured to provide the physical books of accounts within 7 days of time.

18. Item 6 of the fourth CoC meeting held on 05.08.2023 takes note of the status of CIRP of CD in following terms:- “ Transaction Auditor The RP informed that the transaction auditor, M/s. Amit Ray and Company has commenced their work and have sent certain observations/requested for documents/information from the Suspended Directors. However, the auditor has informed that the suspended directors has not provided the desired information/ documents. The RP further informed that he has received the bank account statements from only Bank of Baroda and requested State Bank of India and Indian Bank to share the same promptly, to which the Rep. of SBI informed that they would be sharing the statements by today. The Rep. of Indian Bank did not provide any comments on the same. Valuer The RP highlighted that the suspended Director had provided the list of assets presently available with him, however, on the visit of the valuer, he found that few assets were not available on the site. The RP shared the queries as under:

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022

Sr. Asset Valuer Reply by Suspended RP Comments No. Query Director 1 Back hole Not found This was in non- Rajeshree Anil Loader at site working condition and Chuttar and Anil JCB was sold out to Mr. Chuttar are Anil Chutter in the shareholders in co. year 2018 against his Anil is having USL of Rs 436410/-. unsecured loan of It was pending in the Rs.4,36,410/- in company form books. Still 20/07/2017 outstanding. Please provide Supporting document to verify this transaction. 2 Tipper MH- Not found This was sold out to Rs. 81635/- is still 20- DE-at site RJ Feeds Pvt. Ltd in showing in the name 2405 the year 2018 as the of RJ Feeds in the outstanding payment balance sheet under of loan against this Unsecured Loan. vehicle for Rs. Please provide Sale 81635/- was paid by Certificate. Please RJ Feeds Pvt. Ltd. the provide Supporting vehicle was document to verify transferred in the this transaction. name of this company. But due to oversight, the entry was not taken in the BS of 2018. In the BS the payment received from RJ Feeds Pvt.

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022

Ltd. for Rs… is shown as USL 3 Tipper MH- Not found This was sold out to Rs. 81635/- is still 20- DE-at site RJ Feeds Pvt. Ltd in showing in the name 1108 the year 2018 as the of RJ Feeds in the outstanding payment balance sheet under of loan against this Unsecured Loan. vehicle for Please provide Sale Rs.81635/- was paid Certificate. Please by RJ Feeds Pvt. Ltd. provide Supporting This vehicle was document to verify transferred in the this transaction. name of this company. But due to oversight, the entry was not taken in the BS of 2018. In the BS the payment received from RJ Feeds Pvt. Ltd. for Rs… is shown as USL 4 Excavator Sold Out, This was in non- Rs.5 lacs is still ZX- 110 as per working condition and showing in the name information was sold out to Mr. of Mr. Prashant in the provided at Prashant Jagirdar in Balance sheet. Please site the year 2018 as his provide Supporting USL of Rs. 5.0 Lacs document to verify was pending in the this transaction company form FY 2010.

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022

5 Office Office was We have already Why is it still showing Equipment closed informed you that, the in Balance Sheet? during site office was in rented visit, hence premises & we have cannot be vacated it in the year inspected 2018. There were no any valuable office equipment. 6 Electrical Office was We have already Why is it still showing installation closed informed you that, the in Balance Sheet? during site office was in rented visit, hence premises & we have cannot be vacated it in the year inspected 2018. The electrical installation had to be scraped, so it was left at that place. 7 Computers Office was We have already Why is it still showing closed informed you that, the in Balance Sheet? during site office was in rented visit, hence premises & we have cannot be vacated it in the year inspected. 2018. The computers were in very old & in scrap condition, so it was left at that place. 8 Fixtures & Office was We have already Why is it still showing furniture closed informed you that, the in Balance Sheet? during site office was in rented visit, hence premises & we have cannot be vacated it in the year inspected

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022

2018. The furniture & fixture were scraped. 9 Vehicle RC book We are trying to find it (Tata RX was not out. Pick up) available to us 10 Breaker Not found It was laying at the SB 302 at site site. During last inspection done by Valuer Mr. Bhusan, it was shown to him. It is a small attachment, which might have been missed by your valuer. 11 Water As per RC The water tanker with Tanker Book, Reg. number MH-20- Vehicle A-5551 is on the site Reg. No. which was already was MH-seen by the valuer. 20-A-5551 Another taker with & as on Reg. No. MH20A5672 site, it was in scrap condition MH-20-A-does not belong to 5672. DIPL. It was brought Chessis & there by mistake. Engine No. were the same.

The RP sought comments from the Authorized Representative of the Suspended Directors, Mr. Sudhir Laad. He sought 21 days

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022 to provide the revised Balance sheet as on 29th March 2023 giving all the effects as per reply given by the Suspended Directors towards missing assets. The RP informed that both the valuers have completed the site visit for P&M and are in the process of providing the final report. The RP informed that the SFA valuation is pending on account of non-submission of certain information by the suspended Directors.

19. Thereafter the CoC discussed the further course of action in the CIRP. Item No. 8- In the previous CoC meeting, the RP had informed that he did not receive any Eol in the Resolution Process. Thus, looking to the same and considering the present situation of the Company, the CoC members had deliberated and decided to file for Liquidation of the CD and accordingly, requested the RP to defer this matter to the next meeting. Accordingly, RP has taken this matter in the current meeting and has provided his consent to act as the liquidator. RP informed to CoC that in finalising the liquidation of the CD, COC needs to take the decisions under Regulations 398, 398A, 39C & 39D of CIRP Regulations, 2016, details as under: i. Reg. 398- Meeting Liquidation Cost - The RP informed that while deciding to liquidate the CD, the CoC may make a best estimate of the amount required to meet liquidation costs, in consultation with the RP. The CoC shall make a best estimate

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022 of the value of the liquid assets available to meet the liquidation costs. Where the estimated value of the liquid assets is less than the estimated liquidation costs, the CoC shall approve a plan providing for contribution for meeting the difference between the two. The RP shall submit the plan approved to the Hon'ble NCLT while filing the approval of Liquidation. RP stated that in current case the CD does not have any available liquid funds and thus, the CoC has to approve a plan for providing for the liquidation cost in the liquidation process. The RP shared an estimated liquidation cost in the meeting. The CoC discussed and calculated the estimated Liquidation Cost of Rs. 12 lacs and the same will be met as per the voting share as applicable in this CoC meeting. The CoC requested to put the same for voting. ii. Reg. 39BA - Assessment of Compromise or Arrangement - The RP informed that while deciding to liquidate the CD, the CoC shall examine whether to explore compromise or arrangement can be reached and the RP shall submit the CoC's recommendation to the Hon'ble NCLT while filing application under Liquidation. However, CoC stated that there is no chance of any compromise or arrangement. iii. Reg. 39C- Assessment of sale as a going concern- The representative of the BoB advised to keep the both the options in the first Auction

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022

Process i.e. he has advised to keep Lot 1- Company as a Going Concern and Lot 2- Sale of Assets of the Company. CoC agreed for the same. CoC requested to put the same for voting. iv. Reg 39D – Fee of the Liquidator – CoC has discussed this matter with the RP and after due deliberation it was decided to pay a fixed Fee of Rs. 6 lacs plus taxes and out of pocket expenses at actuals to the Liquidator as the Liquidator Fee and the same will be paid on the sale of assets of the CD. CoC requested o put the same for voting.

20. The Applicant put the resolution for voting to approve the liquidation of the CD. The relevant extract of the resolutions put for e-voting at the 4th meeting of the committee of creditors is reproduced below: “Resolution No.3 – To approve the Liquidation of the CD As discussed, vide item no.8, following Resolution may be passed by the CoC”

"RESOLVED THAT, pursuant to section 33(1)(a) read with Section 33(2) of the code, 2016, the CoC hereby approves the liquidation of the CD and hereby directs the RP to intimate the Adjudicating Authority of the decision of the CoC to liquidate the CD." Resolution No.4 – To appoint the RP to act as the Liquidator of the CD As discussed, vide item no.8, following Resolution may be passed by the CoC

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022 "RESOLVED THAT, pursuant to section 33(1)(a) read with Section 34(1) of the code, 2016, the CoC hereby approves the appointment of the existing RP, Mr. Shailesh Desai having IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P00183/2017-18/10362 to act as the Liquidator of the CD." Resolution No.7 – To fix the fees of the Liquidator As discussed, vide item no.8, following Resolution may be passed by the CoC "RESOLVED THAT, pursuant to section Regulation 39D of CIRP Regulations, 2016, the CoC hereby approves a fixed fee of Rs. 6 lacs plus taxes and out of pocket expenses at actuals to be paid to the Liquidator on the sale of assets of the CD”

21. It is observed from the minutes of the 4th COC meeting dated 05.08.2023 that the COC has, with 83.02% majority, passed all the above quoted Resolutions being Resolution No. 3, Resolution No.4 and Resolution No.7 and thus decided to liquidate the Corporate Debtor. Relying on the settled principle of law regarding the Commercial Wisdom of the COC, we hereby allow this Interlocutory Application Number 4058 of 2023 by passing the following:

ORDER a. The I.A. 4058 of 2023 is allowed and order is passed for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor M/s Deogiri Infrastructure Private Limited. b. Mr. Shailesh Bhalchandra Desai, the Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor, having Registration No. IBBI/IPA-

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022

001/IP-P00183/2017-18/10362 is hereby appointed as the Liquidator under section 34(1) of the Code. c. That the Liquidator for conduct of the liquidation proceedings would be entitled to the fees as approved by the CoC under regulation 39D of IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016. d. The Liquidator appointed in this case shall initiate liquidation process as envisaged under Chapter-III of the Code by following the liquidation process given in the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016. e. All powers of the board of directors and key managerial personnel of the Corporate Debtor shall cease to have effect and shall be vested with the Liquidator. f. That the Corporate Debtor to be liquidated in the manner as laid down in Chapter III of the Code including by issuing Public Notice stating that the Corporate Debtor is in liquidation. g. Liquidator to send this order to the ROC under which this Company has been registered. h. That the personnel of the Corporate Debtor are directed to extend all co-operation to the Liquidator as required by him in managing the liquidation process of the Corporate Debtor. i. That on having liquidation process initiated, subject to Section 52 of the Code, no suit or other legal proceeding shall be instituted by or against the Corporate Debtor save and except the liberty to the liquidator to institute suit or other legal proceeding on behalf of the Corporate Debtor with prior approval of this Adjudicating Authority. j. Liquidator is also directed to consider the Transaction Audit Report, Valuation Report and other relevant documents and if

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I.A. 4058 of 2023 IN C. P. No. 429/2022 deemed fit to initiate appropriate action against suspended directors. k. This liquidation order shall be deemed to be a notice of discharge to the officers, employees and workmen of the Corporate Debtor except to the extent of the business of the Corporate Debtor continued during the liquidation process by the Liquidator. With the above directions, this application i.e. I.A. No. 4058 of 2023 is hereby allowed and disposed of.

Sd/- Sd/- CHARANJEET SINGH GULATI LAKSHMI GURUNG MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL) ---Rajeev kr---

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free