In the matter of Campus Impex Private Limited
- CitationCP (IB) No. 61/KB/2021
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A transaction in which an advance paid by a vendor to a supplier for goods is converted, by written agreement, into a loan repayable in instalments with interest, is a disbursal against consideration for the time value of money and so constitutes a "financial debt" within the meaning of Section 5(8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Where a financial debt is due and unpaid, the amount claimed in default is above the threshold under Section 4, and the application under Section 7 is filed within limitation from the date of default, the adjudicating authority must admit the application if the debt is due and payable and default is established on the records of the information utility or other evidence produced by the financial creditor, and the petition complies with the statutory parameters for admission.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH (SPECIAL), COURT NO. I KOLKATA Company Petition (IB) No. 61/KB/2021 A Petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, read with Rule 4 of the Insolvency and bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016. IN THE MATTER OF: NRS STEEL TRADERS LLP ... Financial Creditor/ Petitioner. Versus CAMPUS IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED ... Corporate Debtor/ Respondent. Date of Pronouncement: August 13, 2024. CORAM: SMT. BIDISHA BANERJEE HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL) SHRI D. ARVIND HON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL) APPEARANCES: For the Financial Creditor: Ms. Rashmi Singhee, Adv. Ms. Sanjana Shaw, Adv.
ORDER Per: Bidisha Banerjee, Member (Judicial) 1. The Court congregated through a hybrid mode.
2. Heard the learned Counsel Ms. Rashmi Singhee along with Ms. Sanjana Shaw appearing on behalf of the Petitioner.
3. This is an application preferred by NRS Steel Traders LLP, hereinafter referred to as “Petitioner”/ “Financial Creditor” against Campus Impex Private Limited, hereinafter referred to as “Respondent”/ “Corporate Debtor” under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, for brevity “I&B Code” seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (for brevity CIRP) in respect of the corporate debtor.
DIVISION BENCH (SPECIAL), COURT NO. I KOLKATA Company Petition (IB) No. 61/KB/2021
4. The total amount claimed to be in default is Rs. 1,17,00,000/- inclusive of 12% interest rate per annum. The Date of Default is claimed as on 30.09.2019.
Facts in a nutshell: 5. The Petitioner herein is a vendor to the Corporate Debtor supplying TMT Bar and made advance payment for the same from time to time. The Petitioner paid an advance of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- on various dates from July 2018 to September 2018 to the Corporate Debtor against the purchase orders for the supplying of TMT Bar to the tune of Rs. 2,59,60,000/-.
6. Failing to supply such materials by the Respondent, the Petitioner demanded of the advance payment paid to the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor requested to convert the same into a loan and accordingly both the parties entered into an agreement on 01.06.2019 and converted the said advance amount of Rs. One Crore as financial loan.
7. The Corporate Debtor has failed to pay the converted Loan in terms of the agreement dated 01.06.2019 and hence, the Petitioner has preferred this petition for initiation of CIRP in respect of the Corporate Debtor, under Section 7 of the I&B Code.
Petitioner’s Submissions: 8. The Learned Counsel Ms. Rashmi Singhee appearing on behalf of the Petitioner brought to our notice an agreement dated 1st June 2019, executed between the parties herein. The said agreement in terms of Clause F, the advance of Rs. One Crore, given to the Corporate Debtor for supply of TMT bar, has been converted into Loan repayable by way of four instalments with a simple interest at the rate of 12% per annum.
DIVISION BENCH (SPECIAL), COURT NO. I KOLKATA Company Petition (IB) No. 61/KB/2021 9. The Learned Counsel would submit that from June 2019 to November 2020, various reminders were issued by the Financial Creditor to the Corporate Debtor for the payment of the instalments due as per the agreement dated 01.06.2019, which has been duly acknowledged by the Corporate Debtor. However, no efforts have been made by the Corporate Debtor to repay the dues.
10. We find that despite notice of service by the Registry of this Adjudicating Authority, the Respondent has neither filed reply nor appeared on a single occasion. It would be evident from the daily orders that several opportunities were given to both the parties to appear but on every occasion only Financial Creditor has appeared through its authorised representative/ counsel, and, the Corporate Debtor has not appeared on any occasion. Thus, we find no alternative but to set the Corporate Debtor ex-parte and decide the matter based on the records available with us and the submissions made by the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Financial Creditor.
Analysis and Findings: 11. We find that from Clause F of the agreement dated 01.06.2019, it was agreed by the parties that the Corporate Debtor would make payment of the amount claimed by the Financial Creditor as loan, upon the execution of the agreement, by way of four equal monthly instalments of Rs. 25 Lakh with simple interest at the rate of 12% per annum due on loan to be paid every month within 30th day of month starting from 30th June 2019. The instalment shall start in the month of June 2019 and end in September 2019. It is further agreed upon that all dues along with the interest shall be cleared within September 2019. The said agreement dated 01.06.2019 is annexed at pages 38-48 an Annexure “F” to the Petition.
DIVISION BENCH (SPECIAL), COURT NO. I KOLKATA Company Petition (IB) No. 61/KB/2021 12. Further, we find that the petitioner has supplied the bank statement annexed at pages 21-23 to the petition, to substantiate the amount outstanding towards the advance payment made with the corporate debtor.
13. We are supported by the views of Hon’ble Apex Court to define “Financial Debt” and to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution process as under: (a) Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Ltd. v. Union of India reported in (2019) 8 SCC 416: “any debt to be treated as financial debt, there must happen disbursal of money to the borrower for utilization by the borrower and that the disbursal must be against consideration for time value of money.” (Emphasis added) (b) Anuj Jain, Interim Resolution Professional for Jaypee Infratech Ltd. v. Axis Bank Limited reported in (2020) 8 SCC 401: “the essential condition of financial debt is disbursement against the consideration for time value of money.” (Emphasis added) (c) Indus Biotech Private Limited v. Kotak India Venture (Offshore) Fund reported in (2021) 6 SCC 436: MANU/SC/0231/2021 (para 14) that: “14. … in order to trigger an application, there should be in existence four factors: (i) there should be a 'debt' (ii) 'default' should have occurred (iii) debt should be due to 'financial creditor' and (iv) such default which has occurred should be by a 'corporate debtor…” (Emphasis added) (d) Innoventive Industries Ltd. v. ICICI Bank reported in (2018) 1 SCC 407: MANU/SC/1063/2017 has laid down that: “27. The scheme of the Code is to ensure that when a default takes place, in the sense that a debt becomes due
DIVISION BENCH (SPECIAL), COURT NO. I KOLKATA Company Petition (IB) No. 61/KB/2021 and is not paid, the insolvency resolution process begins. ...’ “28. … the corporate debtor is entitled to point out that a default has not occurred in the sense that the "debt", which may also include a disputed claim, is not due. A debt may not be due if it is not payable in law or in fact. The moment the adjudicating authority is satisfied that a default has occurred, the application must be admitted unless it is incomplete, ...” xxx xxx xxx xxx “30. On the other hand, as we have seen, in the case of a corporate debtor who commits a default of a financial debt, the adjudicating authority has merely to see the records of the information utility or other evidence produced by the financial creditor to satisfy itself that a default has occurred. It is of no matter that the debt is disputed so long as the debt is "due" i.e., payable unless interdicted by some law or has not yet become due in the sense that it is payable at some future date. It is only when this is proved to the satisfaction of the adjudicating authority that the adjudicating authority may reject an application and not otherwise.” (Emphasis added) 14. We find that this debt qualifies for Financial Debt as per the definition enshrined under Section 5(8) of the I&B Code. The amount claimed to be in default along with interest agreed upon between the parties is in excess of the threshold limit described under Section 4 of the I&B Code. The date of default in terms of the said agreement dated 01.06.2019, arose on 30th September 2019. This petition has been filed on 20.02.2021. Therefore, the petition has been filed within time period and complies all the parameters for admission under I&B Code.
15. In terms of the foregoing discussion, we ALLOW the application bearing Company Petition (IB) No. 61/KB/2021 filed under Section 7 of the I&B Code, and accordingly, we order the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIR Process) in respect of the Corporate Debtor by the following Orders:
DIVISION BENCH (SPECIAL), COURT NO. I KOLKATA Company Petition (IB) No. 61/KB/2021 i. The Application filed by NRS Steel Traders LLP (Financial Creditors), under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, is hereby, ADMITTED for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in respect of Campus Impex Private Limited (Corporate Debtor).
ii. As a consequence of this Application being admitted in terms of Section 7 of the I&B Code, moratorium as envisaged under the provisions of Section 14(1) of the Code, shall follow in relation to the Respondent/(CD) as per clauses (a) to (d) of Section 14(1) of the Code. However, during the pendency of the moratorium period, terms of Section 14(2) to 14(3) of the Code shall come into force.
iii. Moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, prohibits the following, as:
a) The institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the Corporate Debtor including execution of any judgment decree or order in any court of law, Tribunal, arbitration panel or other authority; b) Transferring, encumbering, alienating or disposing of by the Corporate Debtor any of its asset or any legal right or beneficial interest therein; c) Any action to foreclose, recover or enforce any security interest created by the Corporate Debtor in respect of its property including any action under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (54 of 2002); d) The recovery of any property by an owner or lessor where such property is occupied by or in possession of the Corporate Debtor.
[Explanation.--For the purposes of this sub-section, it is hereby clarified that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, a license, permit, registration, quota, concession, clearances or a similar grant or right given by the Central Government, State Government, local authority, sectoral regulator or DIVISION BENCH (SPECIAL), COURT NO. I KOLKATA Company Petition (IB) No. 61/KB/2021 any other authority constituted under any other law for the time being in force, shall not be suspended or terminated on the grounds of insolvency, subject to the condition that there is no default in payment of current dues arising for the use or continuation of the license, permit, registration, quota, concession, clearances or a similar grant or right during the moratorium period;]
iv. The supply of essential goods or services to the corporate debtor as may be specified shall not be terminated or suspended or interrupted during the moratorium period.
v. The provisions of sub-section (1) of the Section 14 shall not apply to such transactions as may be notified by the Central Government in consultation with any financial sector regulator.
vi. The Applicant has proposed the name of “Mr. Surendra Kumar Agarwal”, Registration no. IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P00825/2017- 18/11401, Email ID: surendraca@gmail.com, as the “IRP”. We have perused that there is a written communication and consent of IRP in Form 2 with Affidavit, annexed as Annexure “H” at pages 53-56 to the petition, as per the requirement of Rule 9(l) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016. There is a declaration made by him that there are no disciplinary proceedings pending against him with the Board or IIIP of ICAI. In addition, further necessary disclosures have been made by “Mr. Surendra Kumar Agarwal” as per the requirement of the IBBI Regulations. Accordingly, he satisfies the requirement of Section 7(3)(b) of the code. Hence, we appoint “Mr. Surendra Kumar Agarwal” as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) of the Corporate Debtor to carry out the functions as per the I&B Code subject to submission of a valid Authorisation of Assignment in terms of regulation 7A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of DIVISION BENCH (SPECIAL), COURT NO. I KOLKATA Company Petition (IB) No. 61/KB/2021 India (Insolvency Professional) Regulations, 2016. The fee payable to IRP or the RP, as the case may be, shall be compliant with such Regulations, Circulars and Directions as may be issued by the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI). The IRP shall carry out his functions as contemplated by sections 15, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the I&B Code.
vii. In pursuance of Section 13 (2) of the Code, we direct the IRP or the RP, as the case shall cause a public announcement immediately with regard to the admission of this application under Section 7 of the Code and call for the submission of claims under Section 15 of the Code. The public announcement referred to in Clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, shall be made immediately. The expression immediately means within three days as clarified by Explanation to Regulation 6 (1) of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016.
viii. During the CIR Process period, the management of affairs of the Corporate Debtor shall vest in the IRP or the RP, as the case may be, in terms of Section 17 of the I&B Code. The officers and managers of the Corporate Debtor shall provide all documents in their possession and furnish every information in their knowledge to the IRP within one week from the date of receipt of this Order, in default of which coercive steps will follow. There shall be no future opportunities in this regard.
ix. The Interim Resolution Professional is also free to take police assistance to take full charge of the Corporate Debtor, its assets and its documents without any delay, and this Court hereby directs the concerned Police Authorities and/or the Officer-in-Charge of Local
DIVISION BENCH (SPECIAL), COURT NO. I KOLKATA Company Petition (IB) No. 61/KB/2021 Police Station(s) to render all assistance as may be required by the Interim Resolution Professional in this regard.
x. The IRP or the RP, as the case may be, shall submit to this Adjudicating Authority periodical report with regard to the progress of the CIR Process in respect of the Corporate Debtor.
xi. The Financial Creditors shall be liable to pay to IRP a sum of Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh Only) as payment of his fees as advance, as per Regulation 33(3) of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, which amount shall be adjusted at the time of final payment. The expenses relating to the CIRP are subject to the approval of the Committee of Creditors (CoC).
xii. In terms of sections 7(5) and 7(7) of the Code, the Registry of this Adjudicating Authority is hereby directed to communicate this Order to the Financial Creditor, the Corporate Debtor and the Interim Resolution Professional by Speed Post and through email immediately, and in any case, not later than two days from the date of this Order.
xiii. Additionally, the Registry of this Adjudicating Authority shall serve a copy of this Order upon the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) for their record and also upon the Registrar of Companies (RoC), to whom the company is registered with, by all available means for updating the Master Data of the Corporate Debtor. The said Registrar of Companies shall send a compliance report in this regard to the Registry of this Court within seven days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
DIVISION BENCH (SPECIAL), COURT NO. I KOLKATA Company Petition (IB) No. 61/KB/2021 xiv. The Resolution Professional shall conduct CIRP in a time-bound manner as per Regulation 40A of IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulation, 2016.
xv. The IRP/RP shall be liable to submit the periodical report including the minutes of the CoC of the Corporate Debtor, with regard to the progress of the CIR Process in respect of the Corporate Debtor to this Adjudicating Authority from time to time.
xvi. The order of moratorium shall cease to have effect as per Section 14(4) of the I&B Code.
16. Certified copies of this order, if applied for with the Registry of this Adjudicating Authority, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
17. Post the Company Petition on 24/ 09/ 2024 for filing the Periodical Progress Report by the IRP/RP as appointed herein.
D. Arvind Bidisha Banerjee Member (Technical) Member (Judicial) This Order is signed on the 13th Day of August 2024.
BD/ Bose, R. K. [LRA]
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free