In the matter of Bank of Maharashtra vs. Aditya Vivek Kawade,

National Company Law Tribunal26 June 2025

CitationIA (I.B.C) No. 572/MB/2025 in C.P. (IB) No. 296/MB/2023

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where a personal guarantor in a Personal Insolvency Resolution Process fails to furnish the data required for preparing the statement of affairs and fails to submit a repayment plan under Section 105 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the absence of a repayment plan has the same effect as the rejection of a repayment plan under Section 114 and Section 115(2) of the Code. Where the Committee of Creditors resolves by the requisite voting share to close the Personal Insolvency Resolution Process on the ground that no repayment plan has been submitted, the Adjudicating Authority may take the Resolution Professional's report of that decision on record and dispose of the proceedings, whereupon the debtor or the creditors become entitled to apply for bankruptcy under Chapter IV of the Code.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNALMUMBAI BENCH, COURT - IIIA (I.B.C) No. 572/MB/2025INC.P. (IB) No. 296/MB/2023[Under Section 112 read with Section114(1) and 115(2) of the Insolvency andBankruptcy Code, 2016]Anil Kashi Drolia(Resolution Professional of AdityaVivek Kawade)[IBBI Regn. No. IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P-02327/2020-2021/13482]…... Applicant/RPVs.Aditya Vivek Kawade…... Respondent/PGIN THE MATTER OFBank of Maharashtra... PetitionerVs.Aditya Vivek Kawade... RespondentPronounced: 26.06.2025CORAM:SHRI ANIL RAJ CHELLAN SHRI K. R. SAJI KUMARHON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL) HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL)MUMBAI BENCH, COURT - IIIA (I.B.C) No. 572/MB/2025INC.P. (IB) No. 296/MB/2023Appearances: Hybrid[For Applicant /RP : Adv. Manoj MishraORDERPer: Anil Raj Chellan, Member (Technical)1. This is a report in the form of an application prepared andsubmitted by the Applicant, the Resolution Professional (RP) ofMr. Aditya Vivek Kawade, the Personal Guarantor (PG) to AniirudhCivil Engineers and Contractors Private Limited under Section112 read with 114(1) and 115(2) of the Insolvency and BankruptcyCode, 2016 (Code). The prayers made in this application areextracted below:(a) Pass an Order taking on record closure report filed by theApplicant/Resolution Professional of Mr. Aditya VivekKawade, the Personal Guarantor of Ms. Aniirudh CivilEngineers and Contractors Private Limited, uls. 112 of the IBC,2016 reporting that the Personal Guarantor failed to submitrepayment plan, as enclosed as Exhibit-"A (colly)" of thisApplication.(b) Pass an Order u/s. 114 & 115 of IBC, 2016 closing PersonalInsolvency Resolution Process initiated against Mr. AdityaVivek Kawade, the Personal Guarantor of M/s. Aniirudh CivilEngineers And Contractors Private Limited, arising out ofAdmission Order passed by this Hon'ble Tribunal dated22.08.2024 u/s. 100 of IBC, 2016 in CP (IB) No.296/MB/2023 u/s. 95(1) of IBC, 2016.MUMBAI BENCH, COURT - IIIA (I.B.C) No. 572/MB/2025INC.P. (IB) No. 296/MB/2023(c) To pass an order discharging the Applicant / Mr. Anil KashiDrolia from his duty as Resolution Professional of Mr. AdityaVivek Kawade, the Personal Guarantor of M/s. Aniirudh CivilEngineers And Contractors Private Limited.(d) To pass any such other or further orders as this Hon'bleTribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts andcircumstances of the case.Brief facts of the case

2. The Applicant was appointed as the Resolution Professional of Mr. Aditya Vivek Kawade, Personal Guarantor to Annirudh Civil Engineers and Contractors Private Limited (Borrower).

3. The Borrower is a Private Company limited by shares having its registered office in the State of Maharashtra. The Borrower had availed certain financial assistance from the Bank of Maharashtra (Financial Creditor). As security for the financial assistance availed by the Borrower, the Personal Guarantor executed personal guarantee(s) dated 17.02.2012, 28.03.2012, 30.03.2013 and 15.05.2013. On account of the defaults committed by the Borrower, the Financial Creditor issued a Demand Notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 on 31.01.2015. Subsequently, demand notice in Form-B under Rule 7(1) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process of Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019 was issued to PG on 28.06.2022

MUMBAI BENCH, COURT - II IA (I.B.C) No. 572/MB/2025 IN C.P. (IB) No. 296/MB/2023 calling upon him to pay the outstanding amount of Rs. 35,69,35,879/- as on 28.02.2023 along with further interest.

4. Subsequently, the Borrower was admitted into the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) vide Order dated 03.03.2023. Thereafter, liquidation order dated 01.02.2024 was passed against the Borrower.

5. In view of the defaults in repayment of the outstanding dues amounting to Rs. 35,69,35,879/-, the financial creditor filed C.P.(IB)-296(MB)2023 under Section 95 of the Code seeking initiation of Personal Insolvency Resolution Process (PIRP) against the PG.

6. This Tribunal vide Order dated 03.01.2024 appointed the Applicant as the RP for the purpose of filing his report. Thereafter, the Applicant filed his report under Section 99 of the Code. After considering the report and other materials on record, this Tribunal passed a final order under Section 100 of the Code on 22.08.2024 admitting C.P. (IB)296(MB)2023 and initiating PIRP of the PG and declared moratorium under Section 101 of the Code. The Applicant was also appointed as the RP for the Personal Guarantor.

7. The Applicant made Public Announcement inviting claims from the creditors of PG on 24.08.2024 in ‘Free Press Journal’ (English Newspaper), Mumbai Edition and ‘Navakal’ (Marathi Newspaper), Mumbai Edition. In response to the public announcement, the Applicant received the following claims:

MUMBAI BENCH, COURT - II IA (I.B.C) No. 572/MB/2025 IN C.P. (IB) No. 296/MB/2023 Sr. Name of Creditors Claim Claim Voting No. Received Admitted Share 1. Central Bank of 45,89,54,387/- 45,89,54,387/- 50.57% India -Secured Financial Creditor 2. Bank of 44,85,42,105/- 44,85,42,105/- 49.43% Maharashtra- Secured Financial Creditor 1+2 Total 90,74,96,492/- 90,74,96,492/- 100%

8. The Applicant, as part of the PIRP, sent emails on 25.09.2024, 03.10.2024, 09.10.2024, 14.10.2024 and 04.12.2024, whereby RP sought for data/information from the PG in order to prepare statement of affairs of the PG and further sought for a Repayment Plan. However, the said emails did not elicit any response from the PG. The Applicant, therefore, convened the meeting of creditors on 21.11.2024. During the meeting, the PG was present through VC and agreed to provide the data requested by RP, within a week's time. However, the PG neither furnished any data nor provided the Repayment Plan. 9. On account of the non-cooperation of the PG, the applicant filed an application filing no. 2709138116682024 under Regulation 22 of the PIRP Regulations before this Tribunal on 13.12.2024 seeking inter alia necessary directions upon the PG to extend co-operation to the Applicant. The said IA is still pending. However, the Creditors of the PG at its meeting held on 26.12.2024 approved the following resolution.

"5. To discuss and seek approval for filing of the application for closure of personal insolvency resolution process (PIRP) of the PG:

MUMBAI BENCH, COURT - II IA (I.B.C) No. 572/MB/2025 IN C.P. (IB) No. 296/MB/2023 After deliberation, the members approved the following resolution by "Show of Hands": "RESOLVED THAT filing the application for closure of the Personal Insolvency Resolution Process (PIRP) of the Personal Guarantor (PG) be and is hereby approved."

In the circumstances, the Applicant has filed the present application.

Submissions of the Applicant

10. The Applicant submits that the PG has not filed /submitted any Repayment Plan to the Applicant for consideration by the creditors. Non-filing of the Repayment Plan causes a similar effect of rejection of the repayment plan under Section 114 as provided under Section 115(2) of the Code.

11. The PG has not provided any list of assets or a Repayment Plan for the settlement of the creditors or to meet the fees of the RP.

12. The 2nd meeting of the creditors held on 26.12.2024 resolved for filing an application for closure of the PIRP of the PG and also for filing an application for initiation of Bankruptcy Process against the PG.

13. Since the members of the creditors’ committee decided with 100% voting to close the process, the Applicant seeks to allow the reliefs sought in the application.

MUMBAI BENCH, COURT - II IA (I.B.C) No. 572/MB/2025 IN C.P. (IB) No. 296/MB/2023 Analysis and decisions

14. We have heard the counsel for the Applicant and perused the documents annexed thereto.

15. It is seen from the records that PIRP against the PG was initiated under Section 100 of the Code pursuant to the order dated 22.08.2024. Thereafter, as mandated by the Code and the Regulations, the Applicant made paper publication and formed Committee of Creditors consisting of the Central Bank of India and, Bank of Maharashtra, with voting shares of 50.57% and 49.43% respectively. The PG joined the meeting of the Creditors through video conference and agreed to provide the necessary data within a week’s time. However, the PG has not submitted any Repayment Plan.

16. As per Section 105 of the Code, the debtor shall prepare, in consultation with the resolution professional, a repayment plan containing a proposal to the creditors for restructuring of his debts or affairs. The Ld. Counsel for the Applicant submits that the PG has not furnished any data or material to the Applicant/RP nor submitted a Repayment Plan containing a proposal for restructuring of his debts or affairs. Consequently, the absence of a repayment plan has the same effect as the rejection of a repayment plan under Section 114 and Section 115(2) of the Code.

17. Based on the above, we are satisfied that the report of the Applicant regarding the decision of creditors for closure of the PIRP of the PG is taken on record. Accordingly, the debtor or the MUMBAI BENCH, COURT - II IA (I.B.C) No. 572/MB/2025 IN C.P. (IB) No. 296/MB/2023 creditors of the PG shall be entitled to file an application for Bankruptcy under Chapter IV of the Code.

18. Thus, this application IA.No.572/2025 is allowed, and C.P.(IB)296(MB)2023 stands disposed of.

Sd/- Sd/- ANIL RAJ CHELLAN K. R. SAJI KUMAR MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free