Miss Lucy
← All judgments

In the matter of Avani Projects and Infrastructure Limited

National Company Law Tribunal10 April 2024

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Section 14 moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not bar the recovery of possession of premises from a person who occupies them without any subsisting right, where the licence under which the corporate debtor occupied them has expired and has not been renewed, and the corporate debtor has ceased to be a licensee by reason of non-payment of licence fees. Where the corporate debtor's occupation of premises under a licence has ended by expiry without renewal, and the licensee has defaulted in payment of licence fees, the corporate debtor's continued possession is unauthorised, and the Resolution Professional is directed to deliver vacant possession of such premises to the owner, after vacating any sub-occupant by notice affording appropriate time as per law, while any claim for licence fees or other dues is to be lodged with the Resolution Professional as a claim in the insolvency.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

In the National Company Law TribunalDivision Bench, (Court-II), KolkataIA (IB) No. 1952/ (KB) /2023In CP(IB) No. 378/( KB) /2018

ApplicationunderSection60(5)ofIBC,Code2016readwithRule11 oftheNationalCompanyLawTribunalRules,2016;

In the Matter of:

Devi Trading Holding Private Limited

…Financial Creditor

Vs.

Avani Projects & Infrastructure Limited, having its registered office at 59A, Chowringhee Road, Kolkata – 700 020.

…Corporate Debtor

And In the matter of:

Raj Sekhar Roy, son of Bishwanath Roy, Resident of 29, B.T. Road,

Kolkata – 700 002.

Applicant …

Vs.

1. Avani Projects & Infrastructure Limited, having its registered office at 59A, Chowringhee Road, Kolkata – 700 020;

Division Bench, (Court-II), Kolkata IA (IB) No. 1952/ (KB) /2023 In CP(IB) No. 378/( KB) /2018 2. Ajay Kumar Agarwal, Resolution Professional of Avani Projects

& Infrastructure Limited having his office at Ambey Garden, rd Flat 3-C, 3 Floor, Bangalaxmi Abasan, Dasadron Check post,

PO-Gopalpur, Rajarhat Main Road, Kol- 700 136.

….Respondents

Date of Pronouncement of order: 10.04.2024

Coram:

Smt. Bidisha Banerjee : Member (Judicial)

Shri D. Arvind : Member (Technical)

Counsel appeared physically / through video Conferencing

Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Adv. ] For Applicant in IA(I.B.C)/1952(KB)2023 Ms. Ujjaini Chatterjee, Adv. ] Mr. Sidharta Basu, Adv. ]

Mr. Soumya Roy, Adv. ] For IRP Anupriya in IA(I.B.C)/1291(KB)2023

Mr. Sourojit Das Gupta, Adv. ] For Resolution Professional Ms. Komal Singhi, Adv.

O R D E R

Per Bidisha Banerjee, Member (Judicial):

Division Bench, (Court-II), Kolkata IA (IB) No. 1952/ (KB) /2023 In CP(IB) No. 378/( KB) /2018 1. The Court convened through hybrid mode.

2. Ld. Sr. Counsels / Counsels for the parties were heard at length.

3. This application has been filed by Raj Sekhar Roy seeking the following reliefs:

a. An order be made for delivery of vacant possession of the said premises situated at Flat 5B & 5C, at 59A

Chiowringhee Road, Kolkata – 700 020, by the respondents herein;

b. Direction be made upon the respondents to make payment of a sum of Rs. 23,48,225/- (plus applicable

GST) as CIRP costs as pleaded in paragraph 18 above;

c. Pending disposal of the application the Respondents be directed to make payment of a sum of Rs. 64,68,441/- along with interest @18% per annum per month from th 14 March 2019 till the date of filing of this application and make further payments of a sum of Rs. 1,15,000/- per month till the delivery of possession of occupational charges;

d. Interim orders in terms of prayers above;

Division Bench, (Court-II), Kolkata IA (IB) No. 1952/ (KB) /2023 In CP(IB) No. 378/( KB) /2018 4. The Applicant claims that it is the owner of a flat being premises

No. 5B and 5C at 59A, Chowringhee Road Kolkata – 700 020 by virtue of title documents annexed as Annexure – A to the Application. st 5. That by leave and license agreement dated 01 May, 2010, the said flat was licensed out to the corporate debtor Avani Projects

& Infrastructure Limited (previously known as Avani Griha

Nirman Pvt Ltd) for an initial period of 11 months taking effect st from 1 May, 2010 subject to renewal for another two terms of11 months each onthe same terms and conditions. The terms st expired on 31 January, 2013.

6. The license fee to be paid by the corporate debtor in the terms of the said agreement was fixed at Rs. 60,000/- per months th payable by the 7 day of every month of the English Calendar.

The corporate debtor was required to furnish a refundable security deposit of Rs. 1,80,000/- which was duly paid as in st terms of agreement dated 01 May, 2010, marked as Annexure -B with the application. st 7. That, further by leave and license agreement dated 01 May,

2010, the flat being No. 5C was leased out to the corporate

Division Bench, (Court-II), Kolkata IA (IB) No. 1952/ (KB) /2023 In CP(IB) No. 378/( KB) /2018 debtor Avani Projects & Infrastructure Limited for an initial st period of 11 months taking effect from 01 May, 2010 subject to renewal for another two terms of 11 months each on the st same terms and conditions and the same expired on 31

January, 2013. The license fee to be paid by the corporate debtor in the terms of the said agreement was fixed at Rs. th 40,000/- per month to be paid by the 7 Day of every month of the English Calendar and a refundable security deposit of Rs.

1,20,000/- which was duly paid as in terms of agreement st dated 01 May, 2010 marked as Annexure – C with this application. st 8. That by Agreement dated 01 February, 2013 between the creditor and the said Avani Projects, the terms of aforesaid license was renewed for a period of 11 months subject to further renewal for another two terms of 11 months each on the same terms and conditions. It was also agreed that the license fee for Flat No 5B would be Rs. 69,000/- per month and license fee for Flat No. 5C would be Rs. 46,000/- per month rd and the renewal of the 3 term would be subject to increase of 15% of the existing license fee. Further the Corporate Debtor

Division Bench, (Court-II), Kolkata IA (IB) No. 1952/ (KB) /2023 In CP(IB) No. 378/( KB) /2018 was required to furnish a refundable security deposit of Rs.

1,80,000/- and Rs. 1,20,000/- respectively for each flat which was duly paid by the corporate debtor. The said st agreement expired on 31 October, 2015. By an agreement st dated01 November, 2015, theterm was further extended for a further period of 11 months at a license fee for Flat No. 5B of Rs. 69,000/- per month and license fee for Flat No. 5C of Rs. rd 46,000/- per month. Renewal f the 3 term would be subject to increase of 10% of the existing license fee etc. The said

Agreement marked as Annexure – E with the application st expired on 31 August, 2018.

9. By a letter dated 12.07.2018, the creditor made demand for payment ofa sum ofRs. 13,80,000/- as outstanding license fee st as on 31 August, 2018, on which day the agreement was due to expire. The Corporate Debtor was further asked to hand over vacant possession of the said flats upon payment of the outstanding dues and simultaneously expiry of the agreement vide letter dated 12.07.2018 and the same marked as Annexure – F with the application.

Division Bench, (Court-II), Kolkata IA (IB) No. 1952/ (KB) /2023 In CP(IB) No. 378/( KB) /2018 10. That the corporate debtor has made payment of the license fee as per the said agreements till June, 2017.

11. That by a letter dated 12.07.2018, the creditor made demand for payment of a sum of Rs. 13,80,000/- as st outstanding license fee as on 31 August, 2018 on which day the agreement was due to expire. The Corporate Debtor was further asked to hand over vacant possession of the said flats upon payment of the outstanding dues and simultaneous expiry of the agreement vide letter dated 12.07.2018 marked as Annexure-F with the application. But the Corporate Debtor neither made payments nor did it vacate the premises upon expiry of the said term. th 12. In the meanwhile, by letter dated 4 February, 2019 (Annexure-G), the creditor received a notice from the Avani

Heights Residents Welfare Association of 59A, Chowringhee

Road, Kolkata – 700 020 addressed to the creditor in his capacity of flat owner, demanding payment of Rs. 68,340/- as outstanding maintenance charges for the Flat Nos. 5B & 5C at the said premises. The said notice was also addressed to one

Suman Shaigal in capacity of a tenant. It was evidently making

Division Bench, (Court-II), Kolkata IA (IB) No. 1952/ (KB) /2023 In CP(IB) No. 378/( KB) /2018 it clear that not only had the Corporate Debtor failed to vacate premises, clear the outstanding license fee due to the creditor herein, it had also failed to pay its maintenance charges and inducted a tenant by the name of Suman Shaigal in the said flats which were not permissible under the agreements.

13. Under such circumstances, the creditor issued a notice dated th 4 March, 2019 to the occupier being Suman Shaigal illegally occupying Flat Nos. 5B & 5C at 59A Chowringhee Road,

Kolkata – 700 020 seeking clarifications pertaining to her status and rights in respect of Flat Nos. 5B & 5C at 59A,

Chowringhee Road, Kolkata – 700 020 as the said flats belong to the creditor. th 14. The creditor received a notice through his lawyer dated 28

March, 2019 (Annexure-I) from DSP Law Associates on behalf of the said Suman Shaigal wherein, it was stated that the said

Suman Shaigal is in lawful occupation ofthe said flats since May,

2010 on the basis of an agreement between Avani Projects &

Infrastructure Limited and Suman Shaigal.

15. The applicant claims that its is entitled to receive a total sum of Rs. 88,16,666/- as occupational charges as set out in a Division Bench, (Court-II), Kolkata IA (IB) No. 1952/ (KB) /2023 In CP(IB) No. 378/( KB) /2018 schedule (marked as Annexure-J with the application) and set the vacant possession of the flats.

16. That the corporate debtor has been admitted to undergo th Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process by an order dated 13

March,2019. The Applicant’sclaim in money asa creditor isfor a sum of Rs. 23,48,225/- as on insolvency commencement date, for which a claim has been submitted before theResolution

Professional. However, as on date of filing of the proof of claim, the occupational charges stood at Rs. 82,57,000/-.

17. It is asserted tht the said premises are not a property of the corporate debtor. Upon expiry of the said tenure of the agreements, and the corporate debtor has been in illegal occupation of the same since 2017, without payment of any occupation charges. Any contractual right, which the corporate debtor had, to occupy the said premises, has come to an end by th the letter of termination dated 12 July, 2018.

18. The Applicant laments that it is unable to move a civil court of competent jurisdiction seeking a decree of eviction against the corporate debtor since the moratorium in terms of section 14

Division Bench, (Court-II), Kolkata IA (IB) No. 1952/ (KB) /2023 In CP(IB) No. 378/( KB) /2018 of the Code is still is effect. The only recourse is under Section

60(5) of the Code.

19. It is contended that upon failure on part of the corporate debtor to deposit the occupational charges in terms of Order

XV-A of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908, it is obliged to hand over the peaceful vacant possession of the said premises to the applicant herein.

20. It is urged that there is extreme urgency in the matter in the facts and circumstances of the present case as the Resolution

Professional has recently informed the applicant that the corporate debtor might soon undergo liquidation under the th provisions of the Code, 2016 vide email dated 30 June, 2023 annexed as Annexure- M with the application.

21. Hence, the applicant prays that pending disposal of the application, by way of an interim order the RP be directed to make payment sum of Rs. 1,15,000 per month along with interest @ 18% per annum as CIRP Costs. That the balance of convenience is entirely in favour of the applicant herein.

Division Bench, (Court-II), Kolkata IA (IB) No. 1952/ (KB) /2023 In CP(IB) No. 378/( KB) /2018 22. In addition thereto, the Applicant would submit that the subject property is not needed to Corporate Debtor as a going concern.

23. Our inference:

a. Moratorium under Section 14 of the Code shall not prevent recovery of possession from the unauthorized occupant. In view of the fact that the license period has expired on 31.08.2018 and has not been renewed thereafter.

b. Further, the Corporate Debtor having failed to pay license fees since, 2017 and has lost its status as a licensee.

24. Resolution Professional shall deliver vacant possession of the said premises being Flat Nos. 5B & 5C, situated at 59A

Chowringhee Road, Kolkata – 700 020 to the Applicant, after setting the same vacated from the possession of the current occupant Suman Shaigal, if required by way of notice to the said person providing appropriate time to vacatethe premises as per law.

Division Bench, (Court-II), Kolkata IA (IB) No. 1952/ (KB) /2023 In CP(IB) No. 378/( KB) /2018 25. The Applicant shall lodge his claim with the Resolution

Professional regarding payment of any kind of license fees or any other dues.

26. In view of the above directions, IA (IB) No. 1952/(KB)2023 is disposed of.

27. The Registry is directed to send e-mail copies of the order forthwith to all the parties and their Ld. Counsel for information and for taking necessary steps.

28. Certified copy of this order may be issued, if applied for, upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

D. Arvind Bidisha Banerjee, Member (Technical) Member (Judicial)

th Signed on this the 10 day of April, 2024

M. Jana (P.S.)

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free