Idbi Bank Ltd vs Odisha Slurry Pipeline Infrastructure ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 51 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a financial creditor's application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is pending, the Adjudicating Authority must pass an order admitting or rejecting it without undue delay, and adjournments that leave the application undecided are not an acceptable course. At the admission stage under Section 7, if the Adjudicating Authority is satisfied that a default has occurred, the application must be admitted unless it is incomplete, in which case the applicant may be given an opportunity to rectify the defect; the corporate debtor may show that no default has occurred only by establishing that the debt is not due, that is, not payable in law or in fact, and a disputed claim as such is not a ground for rejection. Save for the financial creditor and the corporate debtor, there is no requirement to hear a third party, including an intervenor, at the stage of admission of a Section 7 application.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
For Appellant : Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Shantanu Chaturvedi, Ms. Srishti Khare, Ms. Misha and Ms. Charu, Advocates
For Respondent : Mr. Amar Dave and Ms. Neeha Nagpal, Advocates
ORDER
15.01.2019 The appellant - 'financial creditor' filed an application under
Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short, the 'I&B Code')
on 12th March, 2018 before the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law
Tribunal), Kolkata Bench, Kolkata but without hearing the Adjudicating
Authority adjourned the appeal number of times for one or other reason such as
filing reply or filing of rejoinder. Till date no final order has been passed though
more than 10 months have passed. In view of non-disposal of application under
Section 7, the appeal has been preferred by 'Financial Creditor' against the order
of adjournment, which has been adjourned for 16th January, 2019.
It has come to our notice that the 'corporate debtor' is from the state of
'Odisha' and the matter may be transferred to 'National Company Law Tribunal',
Cuttack Bench which is likely to be opened on 22nd January, 2019. Therefore, 2
we are of the view that order under Section 7 required to be passed before the
case is transferred and thereby prolongs.
It is needless to say that if there is a 'debt' and 'default' and the record is
otherwise complete, the application is to be admitted. On the other hand, if there
is no 'debt' payable in law or in fact then it is to be rejected. In that view of the
matter we are not passing any specific directions, as the matter will be taken up
on 16th January, 2019 we expect that the Adjudicating Authority (National
Company Law Tribunal), Kolkata will pass appropriate order either admitting or
rejecting the application under Section 7 of the I&B Code taking into the
consideration of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme in 'M/s. Innoventive
Industries Ltd. Vs. ICICI Bank Ltd. - (2018) 1 SCC 407', wherein Hon'ble
Supreme Court observed as follows:
"27. The scheme of the Code is to ensure that when a
default takes place, in the sense that a debt
becomes due and is not paid, the insolvency
resolution process begins. Default is defined in
Section 3(12) in very wide terms as meaning non-
payment of a debt once it becomes due and
payable, which includes non-payment of even
part thereof or an instalment amount. For the
meaning of "debt", we have to go to Section 3(11),
which in turn tells us that a debt means a liability
of obligation in respect of a "claim" and for the
meaning of "claim", we have to go back to Section
3(6) which defines "claim" to mean a right to
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 51 of 2019 3
payment even if it is disputed. The Code gets
triggered the moment default is of rupees one lakh
or more (Section 4). The corporate insolvency
resolution process may be triggered by the
corporate debtor itself or a financial creditor or
operational creditor. A distinction is made by the
Code between debts owed to financial creditors
and operational creditors. A financial creditor has
been defined under Section 5(7) as a person to
whom a financial debt is owed and a financial
debt is defined in Section 5(8) to mean a debt
which is disbursed against consideration for the
time value of money. As opposed to this, an
operational creditor means a person to whom an
operational debt is owed and an operational debt
under Section 5(21) means a claim in respect of
provision of goods or services.
28. When it comes to a financial creditor triggering the
process, Section 7 becomes relevant. Under the
explanation to Section 7(1), a default is in respect
of a financial debt owed to any financial creditor
of the corporate debtor - it need not be a debt
owed to the applicant financial creditor. Under
Section 7(2), an application is to be made under
sub-section (1) in such form and manner as is
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 51 of 2019 4
prescribed, which takes us to the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating
Authority) Rules, 2016. Under Rule 4, the
application is made by a financial creditor in
Form 1 accompanied by documents and records
required therein. Form 1 is a detailed form in 5
parts, which requires particulars of the applicant
in Part I, particulars of the corporate debtor in Part
II, particulars of the proposed interim resolution
professional in part III, particulars of the financial
debt in part IV and documents, records and
evidence of default in part V. Under Rule 4(3), the
applicant is to dispatch a copy of the application
filed with the adjudicating authority by registered
post or speed post to the registered office of the
corporate debtor. The speed, within which the
adjudicating authority is to ascertain the
existence of a default from the records of the
information utility or on the basis of evidence
furnished by the financial creditor, is important.
This it must do within 14 days of the receipt of the
application. It is at the stage of Section 7(5),
where the adjudicating authority is to be satisfied
that a default has occurred, that the corporate
debtor is entitled to point out that a default has
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 51 of 2019 5
not occurred in the sense that the "debt", which
may also include a disputed claim, is not due. A
debt may not be due if it is not payable in law or
in fact. The moment the adjudicating authority is
satisfied that a default has occurred, the
application must be admitted unless it is
incomplete, in which case it may give notice to the
applicant to rectify the defect within 7 days of
receipt of a notice from the adjudicating authority.
Under subsection (7), the adjudicating authority
shall then communicate the order passed to the
financial creditor and corporate debtor within 7
days of admission or rejection of such application,
as the case may be.
29. The scheme of Section 7 stands in contrast with
the scheme under Section 8 where an operational
creditor is, on the occurrence of a default, to first
deliver a demand notice of the unpaid debt to the
operational debtor in the manner provided in
Section 8(1) of the Code. Under Section 8(2), the
corporate debtor can, within a period of 10 days
of receipt of the demand notice or copy of the
invoice mentioned in sub-section (1), bring to the
notice of the operational creditor the existence of
a dispute or the record of the pendency of a suit
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 51 of 2019 6
or arbitration proceedings, which is pre-existing
-- i.e. before such notice or invoice was received
by the corporate debtor. The moment there is
existence of such a dispute, the operational
creditor gets out of the clutches of the Code.
30. On the other hand, as we have seen, in the case
of a corporate debtor who commits a default of a
financial debt, the adjudicating authority has
merely to see the records of the information utility
or other evidence produced by the financial
creditor to satisfy itself that a default has
occurred. It is of no matter that the debt is
disputed so long as the debt is "due" i.e. payable
unless interdicted by some law or has not yet
become due in the sense that it is payable at
some future date. It is only when this is proved to
the satisfaction of the adjudicating authority that
the adjudicating authority may reject an
application and not otherwise."
Further, we may observe that except the applicant (financial creditor) and
the 'corporate debtor', there is no requirement of hearing a third party including
Intervenor at the stage of admission. The order is required to be passed as per
decision of by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, as quoted above. The appeal stands
disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. No cost.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 51 of 2019 7
Let a copy of this order be forwarded to the Hon'ble President, National
Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi and Mr. Jinan K.R., Member (Judicial) and
Mr. Madan B. Gosavi, Member (Judicial), National Company Law Tribunal,
Kolkata Bench, Kolkata for information.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice Bansi Lal Bhat ] Member (Judicial)
/ns/gc/
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 51 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free