Hind Terminals Private Limited vs Satkar Logistics Pvt Ltd
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 810 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where an insolvency application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code has been withdrawn on the basis of a settlement between the operational creditor and the corporate debtor, the Adjudicating Authority ought to grant the applicant liberty to revive the application should the settlement not be honoured.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Hind Terminals Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus
Satkar Logistics Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Savyasachi K. Sahai and Mr. Kushagra Aman, Advocates. For Respondent: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Advocate.
ORDER
(Virtual Mode)
28.07.2022: Heard learned counsel for the Appellant as well as learned
counsel appearing for the Respondent. This Appeal has been filed against the
order dated 07.06.2022 by which order the Adjudicating Authority (National
Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi, Court IV has allowed I.A. No. 2632/2022
where liberty was sought to withdraw the petition. The Appellant is an
Operational Creditor. In view of settlement between the Operational Creditor
and the Corporate Debtor, the applicant was permitted to withdraw the
petition. The Adjudicating Authority, however, refused to grant liberty to
revive the application in event settlement is not honoured by the Corporate
Debtor. Aggrieved by that part of the order, this Appeal has been filed.
2. Learned counsel for the Respondent submits that the Respondent, who
has already entered into settlement, has all intentions to honour the
Cont'd.../ 2
settlement. He further submits that the Respondent is already making
payments as agreed.
3. We are of the view that in view of the fact that application was
withdrawn on settlement, the Adjudicating Authority ought to have granted
liberty to revive the application if any such eventuality arises. We, thus,
modify the order dated 07.06.2022 to the effect that there shall be liberty to
the Appellant to revive the petition if any such eventuality arises. With above
modification, the Appeal is partly allowed.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy] Member (Judicial)
[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical) Archana/nn
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 810 of 2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free