Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Hind Terminals Private Limited vs Satkar Logistics Pvt Ltd

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal28 July 2022Ashok Bhushan

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where an insolvency application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code has been withdrawn on the basis of a settlement between the operational creditor and the corporate debtor, the Adjudicating Authority ought to grant the applicant liberty to revive the application should the settlement not be honoured.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALPRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 810 of 2022IN THE MATTER OF:

Hind Terminals Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant

Versus

Satkar Logistics Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent

Present: For Appellant: Mr. Savyasachi K. Sahai and Mr. Kushagra Aman, Advocates. For Respondent: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Advocate.

ORDER

(Virtual Mode)

28.07.2022: Heard learned counsel for the Appellant as well as learned

counsel appearing for the Respondent. This Appeal has been filed against the

order dated 07.06.2022 by which order the Adjudicating Authority (National

Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi, Court IV has allowed I.A. No. 2632/2022

where liberty was sought to withdraw the petition. The Appellant is an

Operational Creditor. In view of settlement between the Operational Creditor

and the Corporate Debtor, the applicant was permitted to withdraw the

petition. The Adjudicating Authority, however, refused to grant liberty to

revive the application in event settlement is not honoured by the Corporate

Debtor. Aggrieved by that part of the order, this Appeal has been filed.

2. Learned counsel for the Respondent submits that the Respondent, who

has already entered into settlement, has all intentions to honour the

Cont'd.../ 2

settlement. He further submits that the Respondent is already making

payments as agreed.

3. We are of the view that in view of the fact that application was

withdrawn on settlement, the Adjudicating Authority ought to have granted

liberty to revive the application if any such eventuality arises. We, thus,

modify the order dated 07.06.2022 to the effect that there shall be liberty to

the Appellant to revive the petition if any such eventuality arises. With above

modification, the Appeal is partly allowed.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy] Member (Judicial)

[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical) Archana/nn

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 810 of 2022

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free