Hdfc Bank Limited vs Satish Kumar Mathur Liquidator
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 267 of 2023
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority, having passed an order on the merits of a Liquidator's application, has no power to recall or review that order where the application seeking recall is in substance a challenge to the order on its merits and discloses no ground for recall; such an application is properly rejected for want of jurisdiction to review its own order.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE MATTER OF: HDFC Bank Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus Satish Kumar Mathur, Liquidator ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates For Respondent: IPS Oberoi and Mukesh Kumar, Advocate
ORDER
14.03.2023: Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant.
2. This Appeal has been filed against the order passed by the Adjudicating
Authority dated 23rd December, 2022 by which I.A. No. 4207 of 2022 filed by the
Appellant to recall the Order dated 21.02.2022 has been rejected on the ground
that the Adjudicating Authority has no power to recall its own order.
3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that Appellant has not prayed
for review of the Order rather he has prayed for recall of the Order. Order dated
21.02.2022 has been filed along with the Appeal which is an order on an
application filed by the Liquidator praying for certain reliefs. The Application was
heard and decided on merits. The Appellant thereafter filed an application 2
praying to recall the Order dated 21.02.2022. In the application, Appellant has
prayed that order be recalled and Liquidator be directed to place on record
correct valuation after taking into consideration each and every challenge with
respect to the said property being commercial Shop No. G-5, on ground floor
situation at Plot No. 7. The prayers made in the Application were prayers on
merits of the Order and no grounds have been made out in the application for
recall of the Order. The Appellant was challenging the Order dated 21.02.2022
on merits which is clear from the various averments in the application.
4. We thus are of the view that the Adjudicating Authority has rightly rejected
the Application holding that the Adjudicating Authority has no jurisdiction to
review the Order.
We do not find any error in the Order hence the Appeal is dismissed.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)
Basant/nn
Company Appeal (AT) Ins. No. 267 of 2023
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free