Harrish Khurana Liquidator Of Teil ... vs Engineers India Ltd. & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 58 of 2020
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Section 59(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 applies Sections 35 to 53 of Chapter III and Chapter VII to voluntary liquidation proceedings of corporate persons, with such modifications as may be necessary, so that a liquidator's admission or rejection of a claim under Section 40 is subject to appeal under Section 42 before the Adjudicating Authority. Because the I&B Code overrides other laws under Section 238, and voluntary liquidation of a company falls within its scope under Section 2, the Adjudicating Authority has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against a liquidator's rejection of a claim in a voluntary liquidation governed by Section 59, and that jurisdiction is not displaced by the Companies Act, 1956 or the Ministry of Corporate Affairs order of 29th June, 2017, which deals only with the transfer of pending winding-up proceedings. An appeal lies to the Appellate Tribunal under Section 61 from an order of the Adjudicating Authority under Part II, and since Sections 40, 42 and 59 are all located in Part II, an appeal against the Adjudicating Authority's order in such a voluntary liquidation is maintainable.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
(Arising out of Order dated 29th November, 2019 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi, Court-III in (IB) No. 1451(ND)2019)
IN THE MATTER OF:
Mr. Harrish Khurana, Liquidator of M/s. TEIL Projects Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation) Appellant
Versus
M/s. Engineers India Limited & Anr. Respondents
Present:
For Appellant: Mr. Harrish Khurana, Liquidator.
For Respondents: Mr. Anil Kaushik, Mr. Abhishek Mishra and Mr. Akash Bhardwaj, Advocates for R-1.
J U D G M E N T
BANSI LAL BHAT, J.
The question for consideration in this appeal, as formulated on
16th January, 2020, is whether the provisions of Section 59 of the
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("I&B Code" for short) can be
made applicable under Voluntary Liquidation initiated pursuant to the
Companies Act, 1956 and the procedure to be followed and in such
case, whether the appeal under Section 42 of the 'I&B Code' is 2
maintainable before the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law
Tribunal).
2. The Appellant- Mr. Harrish Khurana, Liquidator of 'M/s. TEIL
Projects Limited' has preferred the instant Appeal seeking setting aside
of impugned order dated 29th November, 2019 passed by the
Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi,
Court-III in IB-1451(ND) 2019 with further direction to 'M/s. Engineers
India Limited' (Respondent No.1) to approach the Hon'ble High Court of
Delhi to claim the amount of Rs. 16,29,171/- which is not part of the
Declaration of Solvency.
3. The impugned order came to be passed by the Adjudicating
Authority in appeal under Section 42 of the 'I&B Code' which provides
remedy against the decision of the Liquidator. It appears that 'M/s.
TEIL Projects Limited' is undergoing Voluntary Liquidation Process. The
Liquidator rejected claim of the Respondent No.1 vide letter dated 14th
May, 2019 on the ground that the same was not part of the declaration
dated 13th June, 2016. On appeal, the Adjudicating Authority found
that the explanation by the Respondent No.1 in regard to non
submission of claim for Rs. 16,18,118/- was plausible as the amount
was due and payable which had been admitted by the Liquidator in its
letter of rejection, but that the Liquidator had improperly rejected the
same. The Liquidator was directed to admit the claim of the Respondent
No.1 as per Form B which has already been filed by the Respondent
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 58 of 2020 3
No.1. Consequently, the letter of rejection dated 14th May, 2019 was set
aside to the extent of the rejection of the claim of the Respondent No.1.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
5. The controversy involved at the bottom of this appeal is very
narrow and does not call for a very elaborate exercise as regards
consideration of the issue raised in this appeal. It is beyond controversy
that 'M/s. TEIL Projects Limited' is undergoing Voluntary Liquidation
Process contemplated under Chapter V of Part II of the 'I&B Code'. It is
indisputable that Section 59 of the 'I&B Code' incorporated in Chapter
V of Part II of the 'I&B Code' providing for 'Voluntary Liquidation of
Corporate Persons' stands duly notified vide S.O. 1005 (E) dated 30th
March, 2017 and has been enforced w.e.f. 1st April, 2017. The provision
is reproduced hereunder:
"59. Voluntary liquidation of corporate persons.-
(1) A corporate person who intends to liquidate itself
voluntarily and has not committed any default may
initiate voluntary liquidation proceedings under the
provisions of this Chapter.
(2) The voluntary liquidation of a corporate person under
sub-section (1) shall meet such conditions and
procedural requirements as may be specified by the
Board.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 58 of 2020 4
(3) Without prejudice to sub-section (2), voluntary
liquidation proceedings of a corporate person registered
as a company shall meet the following conditions,
namely:--
(a) a declaration from majority of the directors of the
company verified by an affidavit stating that--
(i) they have made a full inquiry into the affairs
of the company and they have formed an opinion
that either the company has no debt or that it
will be able to pay its debts in full from the
proceeds of assets to be sold in the voluntary
liquidation; and
(ii) the company is not being liquidated to
defraud any person;
(b) the declaration under sub-clause (a) shall be
accompanied with the following documents,
namely:--
(i) audited financial statements and record of
business operations of the company for the
previous two years or for the period since its
incorporation, whichever is later;
(ii) a report of the valuation of the assets of the
company, if any prepared by a registered
valuer;
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 58 of 2020 5
(c) within four weeks of a declaration under sub-
clause (a), there shall be--
(i) a special resolution of the members of the
company in a general meeting requiring the
company to be liquidated voluntarily and
appointing an insolvency professional to act as
the liquidator; or
(ii) a resolution of the members of the company
in a general meeting requiring the company to
be liquidated voluntarily as a result of expiry of
the period of its duration, if any, fixed by its
articles or on the occurrence of any event in
respect of which the articles provide that the
company shall be dissolved, as the case may
be and appointing an insolvency professional
to act as the liquidator:
Provided that the company owes any debt to any
person, creditors representing two thirds in value of the
debt of the company shall approve the resolution
passed under sub-clause (c) within seven days of such
resolution.
(4) The company shall notify the Registrar of Companies
and the Board about the resolution under sub-section
(3) to liquidate the company within seven days of such
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 58 of 2020 6
resolution or the subsequent approval by the creditors,
as the case may be.
(5) Subject to approval of the creditors under sub-section
(3), the voluntary liquidation proceedings in respect of a
company shall be deemed to have commenced from the
date of passing of the resolution under sub-clause (c) of
sub-section (3).
(6) The provisions of sections 35 to 53 of Chapter III and
Chapter VII shall apply to voluntary liquidation
proceedings for corporate persons with such
modifications as may be necessary.
(7) Where the affairs of the corporate person have been
completely wound up, and its assets completely
liquidated, the liquidator shall make an application to
the Adjudicating Authority for the dissolution of such
corporate person.
(8) The Adjudicating Authority shall on an application
filed by the liquidator under sub-section (7), pass an
order that the corporate debtor shall be dissolved from
the date of that order and the corporate debtor shall be
dissolved accordingly.
(9) A copy of an order under sub-section (8) shall within
fourteen days from the date of such order, be forwarded
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 58 of 2020 7
to the authority with which the corporate person is
registered."
6. The conditions necessary for initiating a Voluntary Liquidation
Process, as enumerated in the aforesaid provision and coming to the
fore on a plain reading thereof, are that such Voluntary Liquidation can
be initiated by a Corporate Person which has not committed any default
and the conditions and procedural requirements as may be specified by
the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (hereinafter referred to as
"Board") are to be complied with. The provision further envisages a
declaration from majority of the Directors of the Company regarding
formation of an opinion that either the Company has no debt or that it
would be able to liquidate its liability from sale proceeds of its assets
with further requirements that the company is not being liquidated to
defraud any person. The declaration has to be followed by Special
Resolution within four weeks of such declaration passed in a general
meeting with a further rider that in the event of company owing any
debt to any person, creditors representing two thirds in value of the
debt of the Company shall approve such resolution within seven days of
passing of such resolution. It is significant to take note of sub-section
(6) of Section 59, which reads as under:
"59. Voluntary liquidation of corporate persons.-
....................(6) The provisions of sections 35 to 53 of
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 58 of 2020 8
Chapter III and Chapter VII shall apply to voluntary
liquidation proceedings for corporate persons with such
modifications as may be necessary."
7. The aforesaid provision leaves no room for doubt that Voluntary
Liquidation proceedings with necessary modifications shall, inter alia,
be governed by provisions of Sections 35 to 53 of Chapter III and
Chapter VII. The effect of application of such provisions is that
admission or rejection of claims falling within the ambit of Section 40 of
the 'I&B Code' lies within the domain of Liquidator and the decision of
Liquidator rejecting any claim is appealable before the Adjudicating
Authority. It is, therefore, futile on the part of the Appellant to contend
that the Adjudicating Authority has no jurisdiction to adjudicate upon
the claim of the Respondent No.1 in appeal.
8. As regards order dated 29th June, 2017 issued by the Ministry of
Corporate Affairs in the form of S.O. 2042 (E), be it seen that such order
has been issued to clarify the position and remove difficulties regarding
transfer of proceedings relating to those cases of voluntary winding-up
of a company where notice of the resolution by advertisement has been
given under sub-section (1) of Section 485 of the Companies Act, 1956
but the company has not been dissolved before the 1st April, 2017. The
order seeks to substitute the third proviso to Section 434(1) (c) of the
Companies Act, 2013 by providing that the proceedings relating to
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 58 of 2020 9
cases of voluntary winding up of a company where notice of the
resolution by advertisement has been given, but the company has not
been dissolved before the 1st April, 2017 shall continue to be dealt with
in accordance with provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the
Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The order in question operates in a
different field and seeks to remove difficulties regarding transfer of
voluntary winding up proceedings of a company pending consideration.
The issue raised in this appeal is confined to legality of the impugned
order by virtue whereof letter of rejection of claim of the Respondent
No.1 has been set aside to the extent of rejection of such claim and
issue of transfer of a pending winding up proceedings is not at all the
subject of determination.
9. The initiation of process of voluntary liquidation of 'M/s. TEIL
Projects Limited' has not been called, in question, in this appeal. The
letter of rejection referred to hereinabove dated 14th May, 2019 has
admittedly been passed after notifying of Section 59 of the 'I&B Code'. It
is nobody's case that the winding up proceedings were pending before
the Hon'ble High Court. Therefore, it would be absurd to hold that the
Voluntary Liquidation Process initiated by 'M/s. TEIL Projects Limited'
is not governed by Section 59 (Chapter V of Part II of the 'I&B Code'). It
is significant to note that Section 2 of the 'I&B Code' clearly provides
that the 'I&B Code' shall apply to any company incorporated under the
Companies Act, 2013 or any previous company law, special Act, LLP Act
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 58 of 2020 10
and other specified corporate bodies as also individuals other than
personal guarantors, in relation to their insolvency, liquidation,
voluntary liquidation or bankruptcy, as the case may be. It goes without
saying that under Section 238 of the 'I&B Code, the provisions of the
'I&B Code' override other laws. Thus, there being specific provision in
the 'I&B Code' dealing with admission or rejection of claim by the
Liquidator with mechanism provided for questioning the same in appeal
before the Adjudicating Authority and such provision being made
applicable to voluntary liquidation proceedings explicitly in terms of the
provisions embodied in Section 59(6) of the 'I&B Code', issue raised with
regard to maintainability of the appeal and jurisdiction of the
Adjudicating Authority are without substance and arguments raised on
this score are repelled.
10. On careful consideration of the issue raised in this appeal, we are
of the considered opinion that the jurisdiction exercised by the
Adjudicating Authority is vested in it and cannot be termed improper.
Despite being of the view that the claim initially left out by the
Respondent No.1 was payable, the Liquidator proceeded to reject the
same without any justifiable reason which cannot be supported.
11. In so far as objection raised with regard to maintainability of this
appeal is concerned, be it noticed that Section 61 providing for remedy
of appeal specifically speaks of appeal by any person aggrieved by the
order of the Adjudicating Authority under Part II being maintainable
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 58 of 2020 11
before this Appellate Tribunal. It goes without saying that Section 40
governing admission or rejection of claims by the Liquidator as also
Section 42 governing appeal against the decision of Liquidator accepting
or rejecting the claims as also voluntary liquidation of corporate persons
governed by Section 59 of the 'I&B Code' are incorporated in Part II of
the 'I&B Code', Thus viewed, the appeal under Section 42 before the
Liquidator as also the instant appeal before this Appellate Tribunal are
maintainable.
12. In view of the foregoing conclusion, we find no merit in this
appeal. The appeal being devoid of merit is dismissed. No costs.
[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Member (Judicial)
[V.P. Singh] Member (Technical)
[Shreesha Merla] Member (Technical)
NEW DELHI 22nd May, 2020
AR
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 58 of 2020
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free