Harkaran Das Mangilal And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
- SCC(1981) 3 SCC 124
- AIRAIR 1981 SC 1734
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a statutory authority possesses the power to condone delay in applications for renewal of a licence or lease in appropriate cases, as demonstrated by its exercise of such power in precedent decisions, the authority cannot reject a renewal application solely on the ground of delay without considering whether the delay ought to be condoned and addressing the merits of the application. The authority remains free to refuse renewal on other grounds after considering all relevant circumstances, including the circumstances giving rise to the delay.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
2. The question which arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the mining lease in respect of china clay which was granted to the appellants should have been renewed or not. The Central Government by its final Order learned Counsel 639 of 1978 dated 16-9-1978 set aside the order of the State Government dated 26-11-1977 as having been passed with out jurisdiction and directed that the State Government need not pass any fresh orders on the renewal application of the appellants since it was deemed to have been rejected on 23-12-1975 and since the appellants did not file a revision application against the deemed rejection within the prescribed period of limitation. It, however, appears from the order dated June 7, 1974, passed by the Central Government in another case (learned Counsel MV-i/5567/78), that in appropriate cases, the Central Government has the power to condone the delay caused in applying for renewal of the licence. If that be so, we do not appreciate for what special reasons the delay in the instant ease could not be condoned by the Central Government.
3. Accordingly, we set aside the judgment at the High Court dated 22nd March, 1980 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case learned Counsel 592 of 1978 (R) and the order dated 16-9-1978 of the Central Government and direct that it will dispose of the Revision Application of the appellants for renewal of the lease on merits, keeping in mind the relevant provisions of law which govern the renewal of leases. This direction should not be understood as requiring the Central Government to grant the renewal of the licence. The Government, while dealing with the question of renewal will be free to consider every relevant aspect of the matter including the circumstances arising out of the delay caused in making the revision application for renewal. All that we hereby direct is that the application for renewal will not be rejected on the ground of delay. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free