Greenopolis Welfare Association vs Pradeep Kumar Kaushik Interim ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.876
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority's direction for verification of claims is confined to verification; it does not authorise the Resolution Professional to receive fresh claims from homebuyers unless the Adjudicating Authority permits it. Homebuyers whose claims were already submitted to an earlier Interim Resolution Professional may resubmit those claims to the present Resolution Professional so that verification can be completed.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Greenopolis Welfare Association ...Appellant
Versus
Pradeep Kumar Kaushik Interim Resolution Professional Three C Shelters Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Sumesh Dhawan, Ms. Pooja Mahajan, Mr. Savar Mahajan, Mr. Karan Vir Khosla and Mr. Shaurya, Advocates. For Respondents: Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Ishan Choudhary, Mr. Shaswati Parhi and Ms. Vijea Singh, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Manindar Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Jyoti Taneja and Mr. Prabhas Bajaj, Advocates. Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Advocate for GWC. Mr. R. V. Prabhat, Mr. Daksh Pandit and Mr. Vinay Yadav, Advocates. Ms. Aishwarya, Advocate for Ex. RP.
ORDER
19.07.2023: This Appeal has been filed by Greenopolis Welfare
Association challenging the order dated 26.05.2023. It is submitted that the
CIRP was commenced on 16.10.2020/20.10.2020 and here had been series of
verification.
2. Shri Sumesh Dhawan, learned counsel for the Appellant submitted that
four meetings of CoC were held earlier but thereafter no CoC meeting was held -2-
and when application was filed by the Appellant seeking direction to hold CoC
meeting, another application was filed by another Homebuyer Association -
Greenopolis Welfare Confederation, where direction has been issued on
26.05.2023 for verification of all claims within 7 weeks. It is submitted that
although period of 7 weeks is over but verification has not been completed.
3. Shri Gaurav Mitra, learned counsel for the Resolution Professional
submits that process of verification is on-going and is likely to be completed
within two weeks and thereafter verification report shall be submitted to the
Adjudicating Authority, as directed.
4. We have perused the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority. The
order passed by the Adjudicating Authority is only for verification of the
claims. We make it clear that under the order there is no occasion for receiving
any fresh claims of the homebuyers by the Resolution Professional, unless
permitted by the Adjudicating Authority.
5. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the IRP that the claims are
only received electronically. He has not asked the homebuyers to appear in
person, however, some homebuyers are also coming physically and submitting
their documents. The counsel for the Appellant submits that verification of
several claims were made by the earlier IRP and those claims were submitted.
It is open for the homebuyers who have submitted their claims earlier to
resubmit their claims to the present IRP to complete the verification.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.876 & 877 of 2023 -3-
6. The period which was allowed by the Adjudicating Authority is already
over. We are of the view that IRP to complete the process of verification within
4 weeks from today and submit report to the Adjudicating Authority and
further steps may be taken including convening meeting of the CoC to
complete the CIRP process.
7. We may also notice that earlier an appeal was filed by the Greenopolis
Welfare Confederation challenging the impugned order in Company Appeal
(AT) (Ins.) No. 824 of 2023, which Appeal was not entertained and disposed of
by order dated 06.07.2023 without interfering with the impugned order.
The Appeal is disposed of accordingly.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical) Archana/nn
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.876 & 877 of 2023
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free