Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Govind Prasad Goenka, Kanpur vs Assessee

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal15 April 2015

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Tribunal may recall its own ex parte order disposing of an appeal where the assessee has shown a valid reason for its non-appearance on the date fixed, and recall is necessary in the interest of justice; the fact that the Tribunal has decided the appeal on merit does not by itself bar recall in such circumstances. Where the date of the recalled hearing is announced in open court, no fresh notice of that hearing need be issued to the assessee.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNALLUCKNOW BENCH "A", LUCKNOWBEFORE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBERAND SHRI. A. K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBERM.A. No.10/lkw/2015[Arising out of ITA No.680/lkw/2014]Assessment Year:2011-12Govind Prasad Goenka v. Asstt. CITKanpur Range IIIKanpurPAN:AFJPG4969G(Applicant) (Respondent)Applicant by: Shri. S. C. Agarwal, AdvocateRespondent by: Shri. Punit Kumar, D.R.Date of hearing: 27 03 2015Date of pronouncement: 27 03 2015ORDERPER SUNIL KUMAR YADAV:

This Miscellaneous Application is preferred on behalf of the assessee against the order of the Tribunal dated 3.12.2014 in ITA No.680/LKW/2014, with the submission that the Tribunal has dismissed the appeal of the assessee ex-parte on account of non-appearance on behalf of the assessee. It was further contended that the notice issued by the Tribunal fixing the appeal for hearing on 21.11.2014 was not received by the assessee. The assessee has also filed an affidavit in this regard with a prayer that in the interest of justice the order of the Tribunal dated 3.12.2014 in ITA No.680/LKW/2014 may be recalled and the appeal may be fixed for fresh hearing.

:-2-:

2. The ld. D.R. has placed reliance upon the order of the Tribunal dated 3.12.2014 with the submission that since the Tribunal has decided the appeal on merit, the order cannot be recalled.

3. Having given a thoughtful consideration to the rival submissions and from a careful perusal of the order of the Tribunal vis-à-vis the Miscellaneous Application, we find that the assessee has furnished a valid reason for non-appearance on the date fixed. We, therefore, recall our order dated 3.12.2014 in ITA No.680/LKW/2014 in the interest of justice and direct the Registry to fix this appeal for hearing on 21.5.2015. Since the date of hearing has been announced in the open court, no fresh notice will be issued to the assessee.

4. In the result, Miscellaneous Application is allowed.

Order was pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the captioned page.

Sd/- Sd/= [A. K. GARODIA] [SUNIL KUMAR YADAV] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

DATED: 15th April, 2015 JJ:2703

Copy forwarded to: 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR Assistant Registrar

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free