Gmsra Infracon Pvt Ltd vs Shreebhav Polyweaves Pvt Ltd & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.1609 of 2023
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Appellate Tribunal's reasoning rests on the following points, each of which the court actually relies on: Where a successful resolution applicant seeks reliefs or concessions from a statutory authority, a direction by the Adjudicating Authority that it approach the concerned statutory authority, which will consider the matter under the relevant provisions of law, is a proper exercise of the Adjudicating Authority's power and discloses no error warranting appellate interference. A claim to carry forward accumulated losses under section 79(2) of the Income Tax Act is to be pursued by an application before the competent jurisdictional Income Tax Authority, and the insolvency forum need not itself adjudicate that entitlement. An appeal challenging only the portion of an order that has in substance been allowed in the applicant's favour, where the applicant has obtained the relief sought, gives no ground for entertaining the appeal against that portion.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
GMSRA Infracon Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus
Shreebhav Polyweaves Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Anup Kumar and Mr. Sumit Kansal, Advocates. For Respondents:
ORDER
(Hybrid Mode)
12.02.2024: I.A. No. 5814 of 2023: This is an application praying for
condonation of 14 days' delay in filing the Appeal. Ground taken in the
affidavit is that marriage of the drafting counsel has solemnised in first week
of December, 2023 due to which delay was caused in preparing the appeal.
Cause shown sufficient, delay is condoned. I.A. No.5814 of 2023 is disposed
of.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. This appeal has been filed
against order dated 27.09.2023 passed by the Adjudicating Authority
(National Company Law Tribunal), Ahmedabad Bench, Division Bench,
Court-I, by which order I.A. No.205 of 2023 filed by the Appellant, Successful
Resolution Applicant has been allowed. The Appellant still aggrieved by the
order has come up in this Appeal.
Cont'd.../ -2-
3. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that in Para 14 of the order
with regard to other reliefs and concessions sought, the Adjudicating
Authority has directed the Appellant to approach the concerned statutory
authority for those concessions and reliefs. Learned counsel for the Appellant
submits that the Appellant was entitled to carry forward its accumulated
losses as per Section 79(2) of the Income Tax Act and its resolution plan has
included all these aspects. The Adjudicating Authority had already issued
notice to the Income Tax Department and heard.
4. We have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the
Appellant and perused the record.
5. In Para 14 of the order, following has been held by the Adjudicating
Authority:
"14. In view of the above, all unpaid liabilities and claims that are not filed with the RP before the approval of the resolution plan and those which are not included in the said resolution plan would stand extinguished. The unpaid liabilities so extinguished together with extinguished existing share capital would be converted to "Capital Reserve". The accumulated losses as per the balance sheet will have to be set off first against such capital reserve and the remaining losses, if any, can be considered in accordance with the provisions of section 79(2) of the Income Tax Act. For this purpose, the applicant or the successful resolution applicant can through a separate application apply before this Adjudicating Authority with a notice to the Principal
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.1609 of 2023 -3-
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax having jurisdiction for allowing carry forward losses, if any, under the provisions of section 79(2) of the Income Tax Act.
As far as other reliefs and concessions as sought by the resolution applicant, we direct the said successful resolution applicant to approach the concerned statutory authority for those concessions and those authorities will consider the same in accordance with the relevant provisions of law keeping in view the intent and spirit of the IBC."
6. Learned counsel for the Appellant submitted that the benefit of Section
79(2) for carry forward the accumulate losses has to be extended to the
Appellant, however, the Adjudicating Authority has issued direction to the
Successful Resolution Application to approach the concerned statutory
authority for the concessions.
7. We are of the view that in event the Appellant is entitled for benefit of
Section 79(2) to carry forward accumulated losses, it shall be open for the
Appellant to file an appropriate application before the competent
jurisdictional Income Tax Authority to claim the benefit. We are of the view
that no error has been committed by the Adjudicating Authority by directing
the Successful Resolution Application to approach the concerned statutory
authority.
8. In so far as, other reliefs and concessions, the Adjudicating Authority
has allowed the application and direction has been issued in Para 13 and14.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.1609 of 2023 -4-
In fact, virtually, the application has been allowed by the Adjudicating
Authority, hence, we do not see any reason to entertain this Appeal
challenging the second part of the order as contained in Para 14.
9. Learned counsel for the Appellant lastly contends that unpaid liabilities
have been extinguished together with share capital would be converted to
"Capital Reserve". The said observations of the Adjudicating Authority were
with regard to the Resolution Plan, as was approved.
10. The directions are only for the purpose that the Corporate Debtor may
carry on the business in accordance with law. We do not find any ground to
interfere in the impugned order. Appeal is dismissed.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)
[Arun Baroka] Member (Technical) Archana/nn
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.1609 of 2023
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free