Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Gmsra Infracon Pvt Ltd vs Shreebhav Polyweaves Pvt Ltd & Ors

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal12 February 2024Ashok Bhushan

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Appellate Tribunal's reasoning rests on the following points, each of which the court actually relies on: Where a successful resolution applicant seeks reliefs or concessions from a statutory authority, a direction by the Adjudicating Authority that it approach the concerned statutory authority, which will consider the matter under the relevant provisions of law, is a proper exercise of the Adjudicating Authority's power and discloses no error warranting appellate interference. A claim to carry forward accumulated losses under section 79(2) of the Income Tax Act is to be pursued by an application before the competent jurisdictional Income Tax Authority, and the insolvency forum need not itself adjudicate that entitlement. An appeal challenging only the portion of an order that has in substance been allowed in the applicant's favour, where the applicant has obtained the relief sought, gives no ground for entertaining the appeal against that portion.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALPRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.1609 of 2023& I.A. No. 5814 of 2023IN THE MATTER OF:

GMSRA Infracon Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant

Versus

Shreebhav Polyweaves Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents

Present: For Appellant: Mr. Anup Kumar and Mr. Sumit Kansal, Advocates. For Respondents:

ORDER

(Hybrid Mode)

12.02.2024: I.A. No. 5814 of 2023: This is an application praying for

condonation of 14 days' delay in filing the Appeal. Ground taken in the

affidavit is that marriage of the drafting counsel has solemnised in first week

of December, 2023 due to which delay was caused in preparing the appeal.

Cause shown sufficient, delay is condoned. I.A. No.5814 of 2023 is disposed

of.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. This appeal has been filed

against order dated 27.09.2023 passed by the Adjudicating Authority

(National Company Law Tribunal), Ahmedabad Bench, Division Bench,

Court-I, by which order I.A. No.205 of 2023 filed by the Appellant, Successful

Resolution Applicant has been allowed. The Appellant still aggrieved by the

order has come up in this Appeal.

Cont'd.../ -2-

3. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that in Para 14 of the order

with regard to other reliefs and concessions sought, the Adjudicating

Authority has directed the Appellant to approach the concerned statutory

authority for those concessions and reliefs. Learned counsel for the Appellant

submits that the Appellant was entitled to carry forward its accumulated

losses as per Section 79(2) of the Income Tax Act and its resolution plan has

included all these aspects. The Adjudicating Authority had already issued

notice to the Income Tax Department and heard.

4. We have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the

Appellant and perused the record.

5. In Para 14 of the order, following has been held by the Adjudicating

Authority:

"14. In view of the above, all unpaid liabilities and claims that are not filed with the RP before the approval of the resolution plan and those which are not included in the said resolution plan would stand extinguished. The unpaid liabilities so extinguished together with extinguished existing share capital would be converted to "Capital Reserve". The accumulated losses as per the balance sheet will have to be set off first against such capital reserve and the remaining losses, if any, can be considered in accordance with the provisions of section 79(2) of the Income Tax Act. For this purpose, the applicant or the successful resolution applicant can through a separate application apply before this Adjudicating Authority with a notice to the Principal

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.1609 of 2023 -3-

Chief Commissioner of Income Tax having jurisdiction for allowing carry forward losses, if any, under the provisions of section 79(2) of the Income Tax Act.

As far as other reliefs and concessions as sought by the resolution applicant, we direct the said successful resolution applicant to approach the concerned statutory authority for those concessions and those authorities will consider the same in accordance with the relevant provisions of law keeping in view the intent and spirit of the IBC."

6. Learned counsel for the Appellant submitted that the benefit of Section

79(2) for carry forward the accumulate losses has to be extended to the

Appellant, however, the Adjudicating Authority has issued direction to the

Successful Resolution Application to approach the concerned statutory

authority for the concessions.

7. We are of the view that in event the Appellant is entitled for benefit of

Section 79(2) to carry forward accumulated losses, it shall be open for the

Appellant to file an appropriate application before the competent

jurisdictional Income Tax Authority to claim the benefit. We are of the view

that no error has been committed by the Adjudicating Authority by directing

the Successful Resolution Application to approach the concerned statutory

authority.

8. In so far as, other reliefs and concessions, the Adjudicating Authority

has allowed the application and direction has been issued in Para 13 and14.

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.1609 of 2023 -4-

In fact, virtually, the application has been allowed by the Adjudicating

Authority, hence, we do not see any reason to entertain this Appeal

challenging the second part of the order as contained in Para 14.

9. Learned counsel for the Appellant lastly contends that unpaid liabilities

have been extinguished together with share capital would be converted to

"Capital Reserve". The said observations of the Adjudicating Authority were

with regard to the Resolution Plan, as was approved.

10. The directions are only for the purpose that the Corporate Debtor may

carry on the business in accordance with law. We do not find any ground to

interfere in the impugned order. Appeal is dismissed.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)

[Arun Baroka] Member (Technical) Archana/nn

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.1609 of 2023

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free